The Weasel gets impeached

GOP lawmakers introduce articles of impeachment against Rod Rosenweasel

A group of conservative House lawmakers on Wednesday introduced articles of impeachment against Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, the top Department of Justice (DOJ) official overseeing special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation.

The introduction of the resolution is the latest sign of escalating efforts among conservatives to oust the DOJ’s No. 2 official.

Conservative members led by Reps. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) and Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), along with nine co-sponsors, introduced the articles shortly after a meeting with DOJ officials concerning document production.

"For 9 months we’ve warned them consequences were coming, and for 9 months we’ve heard the same excuses backed up by the same unacceptable conduct. Time is up and the consequences are here. It’s time to find a new Deputy Attorney General who is serious about accountability and transparency,” Meadows, the head of the House Freedom Caucus and ally of President Trump, said in a statement.

“The DOJ is keeping information from Congress. Enough is enough. It’s time to hold Mr. Rosenstein accountable for blocking Congress’s constitutional oversight role,” said Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) in a statement.

The articles include a series of allegations against Rosenstein.

They charge that Rosenstein has a conflict of interest in Mueller's probe, stating that he is a “witness” that could be called in the ongoing investigation into potential abuse since he signed off on an FBI surveillance renewal application to wiretap Carter Page, a former adviser to the Trump campaign.

“As such, his conduct in authorizing the FISA surveillance at issue in the joint congressional investigation makes him a fact witness central to the ongoing investigation of potential FISA abuse,” read the articles of impeachment. “Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein’s failure to recuse himself in light of this inherent conflict of interest and failure to recommend the appointment of a second Special Counsel constitute dereliction of duty. Wherefore, Rod Rosenstein, by such conduct, warrants impeachment and trial, and removal from office.”

“Multiple times we’ve caught DOJ officials hiding information from Congress, withholding relevant documents, or even outright ignoring Congressional subpoenas — and now we have evidence that Mr. Rosenstein signed off on a document using unverified political opposition research as a cornerstone of a FISA application to spy on an American citizen working for the Trump campaign," Meadows continued, referring to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

They also allege that Rosenstein has “repeatedly failed to produce documents” requested by the House Judiciary Committee and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee that are investigating FBI and DOJ decision-making during the 2016 presidential election.

Rosenstein, they allege, has also “attempted to conceal certain facts” by overly redacting documents they requested.

The Justice Department declined to comment on the articles of impeachment, but hours before they were introduced, DOJ officials told a far different story.

Shortly before the 4 p.m. meeting between the DOJ officials and House lawmakers took place, Justice Department officials on Wednesday described in detail the steps they are taking to complete the outstanding document requests as requested by the heads of the House Judiciary and Intelligence committees.

Republicans say the FBI and DOJ have not provided all the documents they are seeking to review as part of the GOP-led investigations into the email server Hillary Clinton used while she was serving as secretary of State, as well as the FBI's decision to launch the federal investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

The DOJ officials, however, said Wednesday they have largely completed Congress's document requests, noting they are working with the lawmakers and their staff to give them the information they still want to review.

So far, the DOJ officials say they have given lawmakers access to 880,000 pages they've requested, and they continue to accept requests for new information related to House GOP probes.

The officials listed three congressional subpoenas, issued by House Republicans, that they say have either been fulfilled or that they are close to fulfilling.

One DOJ official noted that while the requests are historically high, they are working to respond to the lawmaker's records requests — and much of the responding is done quietly.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...uce-impeachment-resolution-against-rosenstein

Your thread title is a tad misleading. He has not been impeached. They just filed articles of impeachment.

1) It is unlikely to come for a vote
2) I don't think they have 218 votes to impeach
3) Even if they did, it would never pass the Senate

Also, I don't think this is the best political move. They should find him in contempt of Congress and demand he recuse himself on the same grounds Sessions was forced to recuse himself. He is a potential witness in any case against President Trump therefore he has a conflict of interest and should recuse. Let the democrats defend that. It makes much more political sense
 
Your thread title is a tad misleading. He has not been impeached. They just filed articles of impeachment.

1) It is unlikely to come for a vote
2) I don't think they have 218 votes to impeach
3) Even if they did, it would never pass the Senate

Also, I don't think this is the best political move. They should find him in contempt of Congress and demand he recuse himself on the same grounds Sessions was forced to recuse himself. He is a potential witness in any case against President Trump therefore he has a conflict of interest and should recuse. Let the democrats defend that. It makes much more political sense

It is a 100% pure political maneuver, another suddle attack by the House lackeys, and most likely orchestrated by the White House, to undermine the Mueller investigation. They fully know it isn't going anywhere, even Goudy didn't sign on, however they achieved their goal of getting the media's attention to muddle any understanding of what is occurring

They won't proceed in any direction, if they really wanted the documents they could request the President order the release of any document in any form, it is something he can do and execute legally, but they don't want the documents, they just want to extend the charade
 
“Could be”? There you morons go again with that “coulda, woulda, shoulda” bullshit.

Any honest player would recuse from an investigation if they themselves *could be* called as a witness. Keyword: honest player. This is 101 stuff.

We call them weasels for a reason.
 
I proved nothing. I expressed an opinion. read my post over and over until you understand it.

It only requires one reading.

In your mind, its like that thin blue line. I can read it a few more times, but it will just reinforce you being a partisan douchebag. You outed yourself.

you might of well said, "why are republicans investigating other Republicans, that is the democrats job."

Either way, you are a partisan douchebag.
 
You are in serious need of this ... :0) SERIOUSLY

51TUxn0mbRL.jpg

Send it to The Hill...they wrote it.
 
Your thread title is a tad misleading. He has not been impeached. They just filed articles of impeachment.

1) It is unlikely to come for a vote
2) I don't think they have 218 votes to impeach
3) Even if they did, it would never pass the Senate

Also, I don't think this is the best political move. They should find him in contempt of Congress and demand he recuse himself on the same grounds Sessions was forced to recuse himself. He is a potential witness in any case against President Trump therefore he has a conflict of interest and should recuse. Let the democrats defend that. It makes much more political sense

Yes, I know. Sorry. Got caught up in the euphoria of the very word being rightly applied to the Weasel. :awesome:
 
You’d cry like a little baby if the tables were turned lol.

Good to know you’re okay with lawlessness as long as ‘the good guys’ come out on top.

Ruh roh! Another "would/if" concoction!

Hypothesis Contrary to Fact. Logical Fallacy.

Dismissed
 
[h=1]Sessions defends Rosenstein after impeachment threat[/h]



Source: CNN

Attorney General Jeff Sessions defended Rod Rosenstein on Thursday, saying he has "the highest confidence" in him one day after House conservatives introduced a resolution to impeach the deputy attorney general overseeing the special counsel Russia investigation.

"My deputy Rod Rosenstein is highly capable. I have the highest confidence in him," Sessions said during a news conference in Boston when asked about the impeachment effort against Rosenstein.

Sessions suggested on Thursday that Congress should focus on other issues instead of targeting his deputy.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/26/poli...-rosenstein-impeachment-resolution/index.html
 
[h=1]Sessions defends Rosenstein after impeachment threat[/h]



Source: CNN

Attorney General Jeff Sessions defended Rod Rosenstein on Thursday, saying he has "the highest confidence" in him one day after House conservatives introduced a resolution to impeach the deputy attorney general overseeing the special counsel Russia investigation.

"My deputy Rod Rosenstein is highly capable. I have the highest confidence in him," Sessions said during a news conference in Boston when asked about the impeachment effort against Rosenstein.

Sessions suggested on Thursday that Congress should focus on other issues instead of targeting his deputy.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/26/poli...-rosenstein-impeachment-resolution/index.html

And, this shocks who? :laugh:
 
And now the Repubs are changing their minds about the impeachment. Why? It has been an absolute necessity. Rosenstein has been such a criminal. Fact is the rest of the Repubs are not going along with anything that stupid and fruitless. Another right wing show opened and closed. When will you guys ever learn?
 
Any honest player would recuse from an investigation if they themselves *could be* called as a witness. Keyword: honest player. This is 101 stuff.

We call them weasels for a reason.

Actually, you assholes call them weasels...because you are assholes.
 
It only requires one reading.

In your mind, its like that thin blue line. I can read it a few more times, but it will just reinforce you being a partisan douchebag. You outed yourself.

you might of well said, "why are republicans investigating other Republicans, that is the democrats job."

Either way, you are a partisan douchebag.


your impeachment aint gonna happen. You own the house, you own the senate and you cant get it done. you are incompetent and a liar.
 
your impeachment aint gonna happen. You own the house, you own the senate and you cant get it done. you are incompetent and a liar.

They are absolutely totally incompetent in the governance department.

They have the White House...

...they have the House of Representatives...

...they have the Senate...

...they have a large majority of the governorships...

...they have a large majority of the state legislatures...

...AND THEY CANNOT GOVERN WORTH A SHIT.

THEY ARE TOTALLY INCOMPETENT IN GOVERNANCE.

They should be the loyal opposition...pissing and moaning about the governance...and telling us how much better they would be at it.

Yeah...sure!

images
 
It's not happening. Weasel gets to keep on investigating the investigation that he himself is a part of.
it was symbolic..Fire the Weasel / fire Sessions is the only way.
But if he does the Democratic media will go apoplectic he's "interfering" in the Mueller witch hunt..

I don't think people appreciate just how crippling that fishing expedition is to good governemnt
 
Back
Top