The USA in disharmony

Republican POLITICIANS shouldn't be accommodated and their insane beliefs shouldn't be entertained. Individual non-politicians is something different. I'm talking to you.

As for the last 8 years .. get real. If 'both sides did it' is your argument, that belies history and the truth .. but you are free to believe that.

Obama isn't Bill Clinton. He's black. Tell me you don't think that was a factor.

Indeed, to each his own .. but republicans crying about obstruction is seriously unintelligent and disingenuous. They're just crying about their own tactics being used against them .. and used far more effectively than they did.

Ok, I thought you were referencing all people not just politicians. Politicians are going to act in their own best interest. A Democrat from CA, NY or MA can be publicly as liberal as they want. If you're a Democrat in a red state, and your goal is re-election, you face a different reality. Republican Senators face the same challenge.
 
Bit like the Nazis and the Jews under Hitler, eh? Trump is a fat, spoilt idiot, and the people who vote for him are half-witted mugs who would love to murder all the rest. You only have read any American site to know you have a choice between fascist dictatorship and civil war.

I thought the Jews were the Nazis, eh, Taffy?
 
??
Oh i get it. redneck bashing..ha ha

Ive about given up on bipartisanship - The Dems were already opposing the SCOTUS nominees before he was announced. 'Join the Resistance" is the new buzzword . lol

If Dems were opposing Trump's SCOTUS nominee even before he was announced, well, that was just one more trick they learned by watching partisan Republicans.

Of have you forgotten so quickly how partisan Republicans refused to allow Obama's SCOTUS nomination to move forward.
 
If Dems were opposing Trump's SCOTUS nominee even before he was announced, well, that was just one more trick they learned by watching partisan Republicans.

Of have you forgotten so quickly how partisan Republicans refused to allow Obama's SCOTUS nomination to move forward.

Judge Bork says hi
 
Judge Bork says hi

On October 6, 1987, Bork's nomination was rejected in the committee by a 9–5 vote...

On October 23, 1987, the Senate rejected Bork's confirmation, with 42 Senators voting in favor and 58 voting against.

Hey lookie there!

Bork, unlike Obama nominee Merrick Garland, got his up or down vote in the Senate.

Thank you for highlighting Republicans infantile double standard.

:rofl2:
 
I don't care.

Are you able to demonstrate that Trump's tax reforms won't lead to a boom in domestic oil production?
Why would they produce it now? The market is saturated with cheap oil, regulations aren't the problem, over production is at this time.
 
I see some weirdo calling me a racist name is trying to sell lies about my position. My family were fighting for Jews when he was being brought up by thugs in Franco jackboots. My father was allegedly on a Nazi death list, and I got my nose broken fighting the National Front. I myself am against Nazis whatever they call themselves, nowadays mostly 'zionist'.
 
If Dems were opposing Trump's SCOTUS nominee even before he was announced, well, that was just one more trick they learned by watching partisan Republicans.

Of have you forgotten so quickly how partisan Republicans refused to allow Obama's SCOTUS nomination to move forward.

Republicans confirmed TWO of Barry's scotus nominees.
 
Back
Top