THE UNIPARTY UNMASKED

Diogenes

Diogenes

Nemo me impune lacessit
They Believe They Are “Democracy”​


The seven NGOs in the chart below, in my view, represent the Uniparty.

Each of these organizations receives substantial financial support from USAID or the Department of State.

Around 2019, the phrase “democracy in danger” began to dominate public discourse, amplified by the media.

This is odd. The U.S. is a constitutional republic.

But a pattern emerged: they are controlled by establishment politicians, they play a major role in shaping political narratives worldwide, and their core mission is always framed as “protecting democracy.”

Originally, these NGOs were created to support U.S. efforts abroad, many of them emerging during the Cold War to combat the spread of communism.

But with the fall of the Soviet Union, their original purpose faded.

Instead of dissolving, they redefined their mission.

Now, they have reinvented themselves as "the guardians of democracy".

This shift explains why Felonious Trump’s re-election was framed as a "threat to democracy."

To these NGOs, “democracy” means themselves.

Their survival depends on maintaining that role, and any challenge to their authority is perceived as a "direct attack on democracy itself".


GjewF9lbwAAHQtJ
 
GjPLVxBWMAAXubK




USAID has pushed nearly half a billion dollars ($472.6m) through a secretive government-financed NGO, "Internews Network" (IN), which has “worked with” 4,291 media outlets, producing - in just one year - 4,799 hours of broadcasts reaching up to 778 million people and "training” over 9000 journalists (2023 figures).

IN has also supported social media censorship initiatives.

The operation claims “offices” in over 30 countries, including main offices in US, London, Paris and regional HQs in Kiev, Bangkok and Nairobi.

It is headed by Jeanne Bourgault, who pays herself $451k a year.

Bourgault worked for USAID at the US embassy in Moscow during the early 1990s, where she was wielded a $250 million budget.

She was the linchpin in fomenting global revolts and conflicts at critical times, before rotating out of six years at USAID to IN.

Bourgault’s IN bio and those of its other key people and board members have been recently scrubbed from its website but remain accessible at http://archive.org.

Records show the IN board co-chaired by Democrat securocrat Richard J. Kessler and Simone Otus Coxe, wife of NVIDIA billionaire Trench Coxe, both major Democrat donors.

In 2023, supported by the notoriously corrupt Hildebeast, Bourgault launched a $10m IN fund for the Clinton Global Initiative (CGI).

The IN page showing Bourgault at the CGI has also been deleted (http://archive.org).

IN has at least six captive subsidiaries under unrelated names including one based out of the Cayman Islands, a sunny place for shady people.

Since 2008, when their electronic records began, more than 95% of IN's budget has been supplied by the US taxpayer, albeit unwittingly.


@WikiLeaks
 
The Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening (CEPPS) is another NGO "promoting democracy worldwide".

They enjoy over half a billion dollars in active spending grants and $160+ million in annual contributions, mostly funneled through USAID.

Despite receiving grants for initiatives in countries such as Venezuela and Georgia, 100% of its funds pass-through to three core organizations:

International Republican Institute (IRI) – 31% of CEPPS funding.

National Democratic Institute (NDI) – 41% of CEPPS funding.

International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) – 28% of CEPPS funding.

Curiously, CEPPS reports no salaries. It is led by Kira Rebar, former foreign policy advisor to Democrat Bob Menendez, the now-indicted U.S. senator.
 
The International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) is one of the three Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening (CEPP) organizations.

Unlike other "democracy-promoting" NGOs, IFES does not receive direct USAID funding, but it still holds $33 million in active spending grants and operates with an annual budget of nearly $59 million.

Its notable principal officers include:

Steny Hoyer – former Democrat US Representative from Maryland and onetime House Majority Leader.

Rob Portman – former US Senator from Ohio (Republican).

M. Peter McPherson – former USAID advisor.
 
Why "uniparty"?

I'll show you.

The other two Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening (CEPPS) satellites, the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and the International Republican Institute (IRI), comprise part of the larger National Endowment for Democracy (NED) which includes four NGOs.

NED was established in 1983 to "advance democracy protection efforts worldwide".

To prevent the Democrat or Republican party from monopolizing its agenda (and funding), NED was structured as a bipartisan funding vehicle that supports two partisan-affiliated NGOs: the International Republican Institute (IRI) on the right, and the National Democratic Institute (NDI) on the Democrat side.

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) by itself receives approximately $1,618 million in active grants (allocated in a single large block by the Department of State) and operates with an annual budget of about $362 million. OF YOUR MONEY.
 
For the education of the ignorant retirees who infest this platform (almost everyone on JPP, in all likelihood), I should explain how the federal budget distribution process works (on the civilian side).


  1. Appropriations:
    • Congress drafts and passes 12 appropriations bills, each corresponding to different federal departments and agencies. These bills are reviewed and passed (or otherwise) by the House and Senate Appropriations Committees, then by the full chambers of both.
    • Conference and Finalization: Differences between House and Senate versions are reconciled in conference committee, leading to a final bill that goes to the President for approval or veto.
    • If signed by the President, these appropriations bills become law, setting the legal framework for federal spending for the fiscal year. The federal fiscal year in the United States is the 12-month period used by the government for accounting purposes and budget execution. Currently, it begins on October 1st and ends on September 30th of the following year. Note that this is subject to change. Initially, the fiscal year began on July 1. This was changed to the current start date of October 1 in 1976 by the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974.
  2. Apportionment:
    • The Treasury sends the funds to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), which then issues apportionments. An apportionment divides total appropriations into amounts available for obligation on a quarterly or other basis, ensuring funds are available throughout the fiscal year rather than all at once. This prevents agencies from spending all their money early in the year. I presume none of you "expert" JPP jurists know what an obligation is. A federal obligation refers to a legally binding commitment by the federal government to pay out funds for specific goods or services. It is a contractual term.
  3. Allocation:
    • Within each department or agency, budget offices allocate funds to different programs or sub-agencies based on the appropriations law and OMB guidelines. This step involves internal planning where funds are divided according to priority, need, and legal stipulations.
  4. Obligation:
    • Commitment of Funds: Agencies can now legally bind the government to spend funds by entering into contracts, hiring staff, or making other commitments. Each obligation must be within the legal limits set by the appropriations; i.e. obligations are made against appropriations, meaning they can only occur after Congress has passed an appropriation act providing the authority to spend your money for specific purposes and apportionment and allocation have taken place. An agency cannot obligate more funds than have been appropriated for that purpose.
  5. Outlay:
    • This is when the actual taxpayer cash goes out the door. An outlay occurs when the government makes payments to fulfill obligations like salaries, grants, or payments to contractors. The timing of outlays can differ from obligations; for example, a contract can be entered into in one fiscal year with outlay payments spread over several years.
  6. Reapportionment and Reprogramming:
    • Sometimes, if unforeseen needs arise or funds are under-or-overused, agencies might request a reapportionment or reprogramming from OMB or Congress. Reprogramming involves shifting funds within a specific appropriation for purposes not specifically authorized in the original appropriation but within the same subset of expenditure types.
  7. Oversight and Reporting:
    • Monitoring: Throughout the year, agencies must report on their spending to Congress and OMB, ensuring transparency and adherence to the law.
    • Audits: Government Accountability Office (GAO) and agency inspectors general conduct audits to verify that funds are used appropriately.
    • The temporary Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is also authorized by the President to conduct ad hoc audit processes as and when deemed suitable.
  8. Year-end and Closeout:
    • Unused Funds: At the end of the fiscal year, any unused appropriated funds that are not "no-year" or multi-year funds revert to the Treasury unless Congress has authorized them to carry over.

I would be remiss if I failed to mention another budgetary tool universally feared by the entrenched bureaucrats of the bloated Deep State:

A federal budgetary rescission (or rescission) is a legislative action by which Congress cancels or reduces previously appropriated funding before it is spent.

The primary purpose of a rescission is to reduce federal spending by withdrawing funds that have been previously appropriated but not yet obligated or spent. This can comprise part of efforts to either control the federal budget, reduce deficits, or redirect funding to other priorities.

  • Either the President or Congress can propose a rescission. If proposed by the President, it's typically part of a special message to Congress under the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, which requires the President to notify Congress of any intent to withhold funds.
  • Congressional Action: Congress must then act on the rescission proposal within 45 legislative days (note for the woefully ignorant: a legislative day is not a calendar day. Legislative days are days when Congress is in session.).
  • If Congress does nothing, the funds must be released for spending as originally appropriated. If Congress agrees, they pass a rescission bill, which then requires the President's signature to become law.
  • Legislation: If Congress wants to rescind funds, they can do so through a standalone rescission bill or by including rescission provisions in other legislative vehicles like an appropriations bill or omnibus spending bill.
  • There are two types of rescissions:
    • Permanent Rescission: Funds are permanently canceled and returned to the Treasury, reducing the overall budget authority.
    • Temporary Rescission: Less common,but still valid, these involve a temporary withholding of funds with the possibility of reinstatement.
  • Impact:
    • Budget Control: Rescissions help in managing federal expenditures, especially when there's a need to cut back on spending due to fiscal constraints or policy shifts.
    • Program Impact: Programs or projects expecting to use the rescinded funds might see delays, reductions in scope, or cancellation. This can affect federal initiatives, grants, contracts, and more.
 
Now, back to more facts that few of you intellectual infants are capable of comprehending and even fewer are willing to try to understand.

This is why it's a two-party problem that requires a Trumpian solution:

The National Democratic Institute (NDI) itself maintains a bipartisan leadership structure:

  • Karen Bass – Vice Chair of the National Endowment for Democracy; former U.S. Representative and current Mayor of Los Angeles (Democrat).
  • Elise Stefanik – Director at the National Endowment for Democracy; U.S. Representative from New York and House GOP Conference Chair (Republican).
  • Mel Martinez – Director at the National Endowment for Democracy; former U.S. Senator from Florida (Republican).
  • Peter Roskam – Vice Chair at the National Endowment for Democracy; former U.S. Representative from Illinois (Republican).
  • Steve Biegun – Director at the National Endowment for Democracy; former U.S. Deputy Secretary of State (Republican).
In addition to the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and the International Republican Institute (IRI), the NDI supports the Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE) and the Solidarity Center.

If you haven't asked yourself why this is so complicated and why it was obviously designed to keep you from trying to pierce the veil, you shouldn't be allowed to vote.
 
Still think those red and blue team jerseys deserve your allegiance?


The Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE) is bipartisan as well.

  • Neil Bradley – President/Secretary; former Executive Vice President and Chief Policy Officer at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
  • Kim R. Holmes – Vice Chair; former Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs under President George W. Bush; previously the Executive Vice President at The Heritage Foundation.
  • Ruchi Bhowmik – Director; former deputy cabinet secretary to B. Hussein Obama. VP of Public Policy at Netflix.
  • Douglas Lute – Former Director (until 05/23); retired U.S. Army Lieutenant General and former U.S. Ambassador to NATO under B. Hussein Obama.
 
It gets worse.

Although the mission statement of the Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE) is to "promote democracy and free markets through a business-oriented approach", its actual activities are not aligned with that lofty-sounding goal, according to CIPE's IRS Form 990.


GjexcArbMAASiOY

The majority of its expenses go toward salaries and a broad “Other” category, which lacks detailed breakdowns. The Schedule O explanation doesn’t provide much clarity—it mostly lists consulting fees and program service expenses, without specifying how these expenditures advances its mission.

GjexlXVbMAAwEkl
 
If you aren't angry by now, you're too stupid to live.

The Solidarity Center (thankfully they don't use an initialism or acronym) is another core beneficiary of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED).

It's affiliated with with the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO).

It could be seen as the socialist counterpart to the free-market-focused Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE).

Its official financial report shows it received $39 million in federal awards.

Additionally, a federal award was granted directly to the American Center for International Labor, which is connected to the Solidarity Center and wallows in $105 million in active spending grants.


Gjex61ZbUAAq1wR




Gjex_BuasAAdlB5
 
The International Republican Institute (IRI) is the third NED-funded NGO that, again, supposedly "promotes democracy worldwide" through an allegedly Republican-aligned perspective.

Its leadership is mainly dominated by RINOs and never-Trumpers.

  • Dan Sullivan – Chairman; U.S. Senator from Alaska.
  • Lispin' Lindsey Graham – Director; U.S. Senator from South Carolina.
  • Joni Ernst – Director; U.S. Senator from Iowa.
  • Tom Cotton – Director; U.S. Senator from Arkansas. I bet you thought you could trust him, didn't you?
  • Kelly Ayotte – Director; former U.S. Senator from New Hampshire.
  • Mark Kirk – Director; former U.S. Senator from Illinois.
  • Mormon multimillionaire Mitt Romney – Director; Former U.S. Senator from Utah, 2012 GOP presidential nominee.

Even Little Marco Rubio was one of them in the past.


It's a big club, and you ain't in it.
 
Still think the red team jersey means something?

Although IRI does not have a Schedule I on its 990 IRS form, its audit is illuminating.

It reports nearly 38 million in salaries, 17.5 million in “fringe benefits”, 3 million in rent, 12 million on travel.


GjeySxdaMAA9y-H
 
Feeling sick at the betrayal yet, GOP loyalists?

IRI also funds a couple of progressive-aligned globalist NGOs, despite its "Republican" affiliation.


  • International Organization for Migration (IOM) – A UN-associated NGO "focused on refugee and displaced persons aid". It "manages migration-related programs worldwide".
  • Office of Global Women’s Issues (S/GWI) – A division within the U.S. Department of State that "ensures women’s and girls’ rights are fully integrated into U.S. foreign policy".


GjeydjLbkAAFlig


GjeyrlKa0AAHWBM

​
 
The National Democratic Institute (NDI) is the fourth and final NED-financed NGO. It serves as the Democrat counterweight to IRI.


Its principal officers include:

  • Barbara Mikulski – Director; longest-serving woman in the U.S. Senate, former Maryland Senator (Democrat).
  • Thomas Daschle – Chairman; former Senate Majority Leader, key figure in Democrat legislative strategy (Democrat).
  • Hungry Hippo and election-denier Stacey Abrams – Director; high-profile Georgia race hustler, voting ID opponent, and failed gubernatorial candidate (Democrat).
  • DEI Donna Brazile – Director; Democrat strategist, former DNC chair, and paid political propagandist (Democrat).


Like the IRI’, the NDI’s audit is heavy on salaries, travel, and fringe benefits.


Gjey2B7agAAtfQS


Gjey5eDbkAAkvM0



​
 
Feeling smug, Team Blue? You're certainly stupid enough.

NDI has $47 million in active spending grants worldwide.

Some of its major grantees, as listed on its IRS Form 990 Schedule I, include:

  • Internews Network – Received $2.3 million to support "independent media and press freedom initiatives".
  • American Bar Association – Granted $1.1 million for "legal and judicial development programs related to democracy".

GjezPWvbwAAAJNV


You'll LOVE this one, JPP Democrats:

International Republican Institute (IRI) – Surprisingly, NDI awarded $1 million to its Republican-aligned counterpart, despite their partisan affiliations, showing how these democracy-promoting NGOs interconnect as a true Uniparty.


GjezKDrbAAAmaWj
 


THE MACHINE FIGHTS BACK



GjbkxHna4AANU0l



​

When DOGE found empty fields in Treasury's payment system, they uncovered more than missing data. They found a mechanism.

​

Simple things were left blank:

  • Payment categories
  • Payment rationales
  • Basic audit controls

The kind of fields any accounting would require. The kind that let you track where money goes. The kind designed to stop billions of dollars of fraud.


Here's what the Machine didn't want exposed:

  • Over $100 billion flowing annually to accounts without Social Security numbers.
    No temporary ID numbers.
    No verification.
 
Where did the Washington establishment get their millions?

Nancy Pelosi: Annual salary: $223,000 Net worth: $202 million

Mitch McConnell: Annual salary: $200,000 Net worth: $95 million

Chuck Schumer: Annual salary: $210,000 Net worth: $75 million

Elizabeth Warren: Annual salary: $285,000 Net worth: $67 million
 
J.B. Pritzker: Annual Salary: $177,412 Net Worth: $3.4 billion

Doug Burgum: Annual Salary: $129,096 Net Worth: $1.1 billion

Darrell Issa: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $460 million

Jim Justice: Annual Salary: $150,000 Net Worth: $450 million

Jared Polis: Annual Salary: $123,193 Net Worth: $400 million

Glenn Youngkin: Annual Salary: $175,000 Net Worth: $400 million

Rick Scott: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $300 million

Mitt Romney: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $300 million

Kevin Hern: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $361 million

Dan Goldman: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $253 million

Mark Warner: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $215 million

Michael McCaul: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $200 million

Scott Peters: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $200 million

Greg Gianforte: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $189.3 million

Paul Mitchell: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $179.6 million

Vernon Buchanan: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $157.2 million

Mike Braun: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $136.8 million

Don Beyer: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $124.9 million

Dean Phillips: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $123.8 million

John Hoeven: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $93.4 million

Suzan DelBene: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $79.4 million

Fred Upton: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $79 million

Ron Johnson: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $78.5 million

Roger Williams: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $67 million

Buddy Carter: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $66.5 million

Rick W. Allen: Annual Salary: $174,000 Net Worth: $52.1 million

Sources:

https://opensecrets.org/personal-finances…

https://ballotpedia.org/Net_worth_of_United_States_Senators_and_Representatives…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_members_of_the_United_States_Congress_by_wealth
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top