The ugly left....

Ahh, bravado. Whistle in the dark, dear boy. Most people are frightened of things they do not understand. Keep whistling.
I state that I have no fear of the truth, and you reply that I'm 'whistling in the dark', 180 degrees opposite of reality. You're exposing your lack of intelligence even further with your response to my post directed at someone else.
 
I state that I have no fear of the truth, and you reply that I'm 'whistling in the dark', 180 degrees opposite of reality. You're exposing your lack of intelligence even further with your response to my post directed at someone else.

What then is the truth? Is it likely that a person who changes his name to hide his identity recognises the truth? 180 degrees? I think you'll find that that is a straight line.
I have no fear of exposing my lack of intelligence. I have never supposed myself to be any better than the average human being on this planet... but, you know what they say.... In the land of the blind....
 
What then is the truth? Is it likely that a person who changes his name to hide his identity recognises the truth? 180 degrees? I think you'll find that that is a straight line.
I have no fear of exposing my lack of intelligence. I have never supposed myself to be any better than the average human being on this planet... but, you know what they say.... In the land of the blind....

He states he has no fear of the truth.....yet, here he is, posing as MLK, with the lie, that MLK was a conservative Republican, as a subscript. Way past insult to injury, having nothing to do with the truth, but BS propaganda, and contempt for MLK. My stomach turns.
 
What then is the truth? Is it likely that a person who changes his name to hide his identity recognises the truth? 180 degrees? I think you'll find that that is a straight line.
I have no fear of exposing my lack of intelligence. I have never supposed myself to be any better than the average human being on this planet... but, you know what they say.... In the land of the blind....

Arguing with you is like arguing with a 5th grader, except you're not as smart as the typical 5th grader. No one is hiding his identity here. The user name history is listed right on everyone's profile, and a search of archival posts using the current user name will yield the same results regardless of how many times the name has been changed.
 
He states he has no fear of the truth.....yet, here he is, posing as MLK, with the lie, that MLK was a conservative Republican, as a subscript. Way past insult to injury, having nothing to do with the truth, but BS propaganda, and contempt for MLK. My stomach turns.

MLK's father was a registered Republican. The fact is the republicans gave the Civil Rights Bill more support than Democrats did. It's wasn't republicans who filibustered the bill. Democrats. Rewrite your history somewhere else.
 
MLK's father was a registered Republican. The fact is the republicans gave the Civil Rights Bill more support than Democrats did. It's wasn't republicans who filibustered the bill. Democrats. Rewrite your history somewhere else.
Look further back in history and we see the Democrats on the losing side of civil rights back to well before the Civil War.
 
I suggest you read this book. Very informative and educational.
http://www.amazon.com/Uncle-Sams-Plantation-Government-Enslaves/dp/0785262199

Excuse me? Written by Star Parker, an "Aunt Susie" (read: a female Uncle Tom),
apologist for whites and formerly accused of welfare fraud.

Star Parker (born Larstella Irby in 1956[citation needed]) was the 2010 Republican Party candidate for the California's 37th congressional district, and a American political commentator, author, and social critic. Parker is also an advocate and spokesperson for American conservative causes.

Which has got what to do with Damn Yankee "posing' as MLK, with the subtext "conservative Republican"???????????????
I hardly would follow any of your recommendations for anything, bitch. And you have no clue as to what is informative or educational. I hope I made myself clear.
 
Excuse me? Written by Star Parker, an "Aunt Susie" (read: a female Uncle Tom),
apologist for whites and formerly accused of welfare fraud.



Which has got what to do with Damn Yankee "posing' as MLK, with the subtext "conservative Republican"???????????????
I hardly would follow any of your recommendations for anything, bitch. And you have no clue as to what is informative or educational. I hope I made myself clear.

Thanks once again for showing everyone your racism and hatred. Thank you, Mr. Christian.
 
MLK's father was a registered Republican. The fact is the republicans gave the Civil Rights Bill more support than Democrats did. It's wasn't republicans who filibustered the bill. Democrats. Rewrite your history somewhere else.

Indeed. His father was, as was most blacks. However Kennedy managed to woo black voters, who voted for him , overwhelmingly over Nixon...and it was a critical time, leading up to the March on Washington, in 1963, and MLK, Jr. was "on the fence" about endorsing any one party. The Republicans did support the Civil Rights Bill. The Dems who filibustered the bill consisted mostly of "Dixiecrats"...Southern Democrats, who were not thrilled about blacks having equal rights. Eventually, they fled the Democratic Party, in the late 60's and early 70's into the Republican Party....where they currently reside. Apparently they have been reincarnated as The Tea Party. LOL
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_did_...me_democrats_and_democrats_became_republicans

No history to rewrite. You can claim that Republicans championed civil rights..but those Republicans are now known as Democrats.
 
Thanks once again for showing everyone your racism and hatred. Thank you, Mr. Christian.

Racism? Hatred? In calling out, one of my own, as a wolf in sheep's clothing? Just protecting my interests, over yours. And you're welcome..Mr. Fake Christian.
 
Indeed. His father was, as was most blacks. However Kennedy managed to woo black voters, who voted for him , overwhelmingly over Nixon...and it was a critical time, leading up to the March on Washington, in 1963, and MLK, Jr. was "on the fence" about endorsing any one party. The Republicans did support the Civil Rights Bill. The Dems who filibustered the bill consisted mostly of "Dixiecrats"...Southern Democrats, who were not thrilled about blacks having equal rights. Eventually, they fled the Democratic Party, in the late 60's and early 70's into the Republican Party....where they currently reside. Apparently they have been reincarnated as The Tea Party. LOL
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_did_...me_democrats_and_democrats_became_republicans

No history to rewrite. You can claim that Republicans championed civil rights..but those Republicans are now known as Democrats.

http://www.black-and-right.com/2010/03/19/the-dixiecrat-myth/
 
In order for Poet's wiki-history to be true an entire generation of Democrats had to switch political orientation over one issue, in spite of being brought up by parents and grandparents instilling upon them their values. And the same generation of Republicans had to do the equal and opposite thing at the same time. :)
 

Excuse me? You posted a link to Star Parker, to attempt to add credibility to the right, by some testimony from a black conservative...and I countered by saying that a black conservative has no credibility by default. And so you post another black conservative, as further proof. No Uncle Tom or Aunt Susie, can tell me anything, because , they have, in fact, "SOLD OUT". And that's a take, only I , as a black man, can weigh in on.....you have zero credibility, next to me. You can weigh in on Joe Biden, or Hillary Clinton...but you can't tell me nothing about a black person. Get it? Got it? Good.
 
Explain to us why Star Parker is a racist. Thanks.

I didn't say she was a racist. In fact, I don't think she is a racist. She is an apologist for racist whites. Two different things. I was responding to your calls of me being a racist, which I'm not.
 
Excuse me? You posted a link to Star Parker, to attempt to add credibility to the right, by some testimony from a black conservative...and I countered by saying that a black conservative has no credibility by default. And so you post another black conservative, as further proof. No Uncle Tom or Aunt Susie, can tell me anything, because , they have, in fact, "SOLD OUT". And that's a take, only I , as a black man, can weigh in on.....you have zero credibility, next to me. You can weigh in on Joe Biden, or Hillary Clinton...but you can't tell me nothing about a black person. Get it? Got it? Good.

So anyone who is black and doesn't think like you do is a "sellout" or an "Uncle Tom", etc. You're providing us all with a very complete total example of racism. Thank you so much for proving the point.
 
Back
Top