"The Trump Presidency is OVER" - Bannon

Beyond the pale: China’s cheerful racists
https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/08/beyond-the-pale-chinas-cheerful-racists/
It started when I went around the classroom, asking pupils which city they were from. When I got to a slightly darker-skinned boy, his classmates thought it was hilarious to shout ‘Africa!’ It’s a theme. A girl with a similar complexion was taunted with monkey sounds; her peers refused to sit next to her, saying she smelt bad. I apparently erred when, teaching the word for wife, I showed my students a picture of Michelle Obama. The image of the then First Lady was greeted with exaggerated sounds of repulsion: ‘So ugly!’ they said. ‘So black!’

Such comments would have been treated harshly in a British classroom a quarter-century ago, let alone today. But my own protestations were met with confused faces — crestfallen that they’d disappointed their teacher, but clueless as to the nature of their mistake. And this stretches far beyond the classroom. To many Chinese, ideas about racial hierarchies are not outdated anathema but unquestioned belief.

In Britain, a politician who uses a defunct idiom like ‘nigger in the woodpile’ loses the whip. In China, racism is a standard undercurrent of public debate. A few months ago, Pan Qinglin, a Tianjin politician, announced to reporters that he had found out how to ‘solve the problem of the black population in Guangdong’ — a province with a small amount of African migration. Warning that the new arrivals brought drugs, sexual assault and infectious diseases, he urged local policy-makers to tighten controls to prevent China turning ‘from a yellow country to a black-and-yellow country’.

The Chinese don’t make a big deal about their racism: it’s so commonplace it can seem almost cheerful.

There used to be a poster here, Lowaicue, who was a Brit living in Hong Kong. He was a target of racism every time he left the house. People, esp. children, stared at him and called him "gweilo" which was a derogatory term. People didn't want to sit near him on the bus. So that cheerful Chinese racism is a big deal for those who are targeted.
 
There used to be a poster here, Lowaicue, who was a Brit living in Hong Kong. He was a target of racism every time he left the house. People, esp. children, stared at him and called him "gweilo" which was a derogatory term. People didn't want to sit near him on the bus. So that cheerful Chinese racism is a big deal for those who are targeted.
I miss him.
 
There used to be a poster here, Lowaicue, who was a Brit living in Hong Kong. He was a target of racism every time he left the house. People, esp. children, stared at him and called him "gweilo" which was a derogatory term. People didn't want to sit near him on the bus. So that cheerful Chinese racism is a big deal for those who are targeted.

right..the "cheerful" racism isn't so cheerful for those targeted..nicely stated
 
You are one effing arrogant liar. We've read enough of your racist comments and racial slurs over the years to know that you are bigoted to the extreme.

the definition states very clearly that a racist thinks once race is superior to another. I have never claimed that. In fact, supporting affirmative action is tacit admission that one race is inferior and needs a leg up.

Using certain words does not meet the definition of racist. Despite what you say Cuntiefan
 
the definition states very clearly that a racist thinks once race is superior to another. I have never claimed that. In fact, supporting affirmative action is tacit admission that one race is inferior and needs a leg up.

Using certain words does not meet the definition of racist. Despite what you say Cuntiefan

Affirmative action is about history & circumstances - not racial superiority or inferiority.

What a twisted viewpoint.
 
Affirmative action is about history & circumstances - not racial superiority or inferiority.

What a twisted viewpoint.

Bullshit. The implication is that blacks aren't able to overcome obstacles in their way. You treat them like babies. Which is racist. Hell you fuckers don't even think they are smart enough to get an ID card to vote. You don't think they are smart enough to get to a polling place to vote.
 
Bullshit. The implication is that blacks aren't able to overcome obstacles in their way. You treat them like babies. Which is racist. Hell you fuckers don't even think they are smart enough to get an ID card to vote. You don't think they are smart enough to get to a polling place to vote.

Nope. The implication is that blacks still have bigger & more frequent obstacles, particularly with education & jobs. Which is not surprising, considering that slavery wasn't really that long ago, and civil rights was even more recent, and considering that the country still has an issue w/ racism.
 
Nope. The implication is that blacks still have bigger & more frequent obstacles, particularly with education & jobs. Which is not surprising, considering that slavery wasn't really that long ago, and civil rights was even more recent, and considering that the country still has an issue w/ racism.

So what is about the blacks that they can't overcome those obstacles?

How do you explain the fact that the illegitimacy rate among the blacks was lower back in the 1920s than now?

Why can't they overcome those obstacles? Are they lacking some skill set? Are you saying there is inherent racism in academia that is predominantly run by leftists? Are you saying teachers unions who run public schools and vote for democrats are racist and don't educate the blacks?

It has been 150 years since slavery ended, how much longer do they need?
 
Back
Top