the time for RE-legalization is NOW!

Topspin

Verified User
Medical marijuana’s not getting any better – the time for RE-legalization is NOW!
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:30:34 By: Russ Belville, NORML Outreach Coordinator
Share This Article
Marijuana Law Reform in 2010 (March Update)
With New Jersey recently becoming the 14th medical marijuana state, activists in marijuana law reform have been celebrating. After all, over 82 million Americans now live in states where medical use of marijuana is legal – that’s 27% of the US population! Last election, Massachusetts became the 13th decriminalization state, which means over 107 million Americans live in a state where possession of small personal amounts of marijuana no longer merit an arrest – that’s 35% of the US population.


Population of States with Medical Marijuana Laws

Population of States that have Decriminalized Marijuana
However, after watching fourteen years of marijuana activism focused solely on those who use cannabis for medicine, I must warn activists that medical marijuana is not getting any better and the time for re-legalization of cannabis for all adults – even the healthy ones – is now.



Comparison of five core rights found in existing medical marijuana law

Medical marijuana was a great 20th century strategy to get the sick and dying off the battlefield in the war on drugs. It was the perfect vehicle to enlighten the public, who for so long have been indoctrinated into the reefer madness that classifies cannabis like LSD and heroin. But in the 21st century the idea that marijuana is only a medicine is beginning to take hold and governments and voters are crafting ever-more-restrictive medical marijuana laws. For the vast majority of cannabis consumers this threatens to move us from the category of “illegal drug users” to “possessors of medicine without a prescription” – a step up, perhaps, but still left facing criminal prosecution.

California legalized medical marijuana in 1996. That initiative, Prop-215, established what is clearly the most liberal medical marijuana statute to date:

A doctor can recommend for any condition;
You needn’t have a “bona fide” doctor/patient relationship;
Dispensaries are allowed;
Self cultivation is allowed;
Patients are protected from arrest.

Comparison of plant and possession limits and qualifying conditions in medical marijuana law
If we consider these five attributes of the law the baseline, then in the past fourteen years, all thirteen medical marijuana states that have followed have failed to achieve all five. Eight states only offer three or four of those liberties and the rest offer two or only one. Most disturbingly, the right of patients to grow their own medicine (or have a caregiver do it for them), which has been a bedrock principle in medical marijuana law, was taken away from patients in the most recent medical marijuana state, New Jersey. Bills that were considered but vetoed in 2009 in Minnesota and New Hampshire, and those moving forward in New York, Pennsylvania, as well as an initiative in Arizona, all sacrifice this core right.


New Jersey - The (No Medical Marijuana) Garden State
A comparison of plant and possession limits also shows the decline from the original starting point in California, where 12 plants and 8 ounces are allowed. Oregon and Washington passed their laws next and have the highest statutory limits: 24 plants and 24 ounces in Oregon and 15 plants and 24 ounces in Washington. (To be fair, all the West Coast states started with lower limits or more vague limits that were modified by the legislature.) But since then, only one state has allowed more than 3 ounces (New Mexico with 6 ounces) and average number of plants allowed is a little less than ten.


The "Big 8" Conditions for which marijuana is recommended in the states
Another decline in medical marijuana freedom appears when we look at the conditions for which medical marijuana protection is afforded in the various states. There are eight conditions which could be considered the “standard” ones: cancer; HIV/AIDS; seizure disorders, like epilepsy; spastic disorders, like multiple sclerosis; glaucoma; chronic nausea; cachexia; and chronic pain. Most medical marijuana states recognize all eight conditions; a couple (Vermont and Rhode Island) recognize seven of eight.


Other conditions recognized in state medical marijuana laws (not a complete list)
The latest law in New Jersey, however, eliminated chronic pain, chronic nausea, and cachexia, making it the most restrictive list in the nation. The bill proposed but vetoed in New Hampshire required one to try all other remedies for chronic pain before trying medical marijuana. The vetoed Minnesota bill wouldn’t even allow cancer and HIV/AIDS patients to use medical marijuana unless they could show they were terminal (about to die). The lists in the latest proposed bills continue to become more restricted.

Until we do have legalization for all, every medical marijuana law is going to fail to adequately serve all medical users and subject them to increasing restriction and scrutiny. Additionally, medical marijuana laws make patients an attractive target for criminals because prohibition maintains huge profits for stolen medical cannabis, as well as becoming targets for overzealous anti-marijuana cops and prosecutors.
 
Cool 35% live in states that are decrim!!!

I'm going to assume that exactly 0% of the decrim states are in the conservative/republican south.



California legalized medical marijuana in 1996. That initiative, Prop-215, established what is clearly the most liberal medical marijuana statute to date:

A doctor can recommend for any condition;
Dispensaries are allowed;

You needn’t have a “bona fide” doctor/patient relationship;
Self cultivation is allowed;


Patients are protected from arrest.


Holy Mother of God, how did I miss this??!!

:cheer::party:
 
thanks bro way to rub it in my face


My bad, bro'. That's bad karma to party on, while mocking you southern rubes.

I've been kinda pissed at Hussein Obama, but if he does nothing else I'm ranking him in the top 5 presidents simply for ending the Bush policy of arresting people who are complying with State law. Party on my cajun brotha.......



California legalized medical marijuana in 1996. That initiative, Prop-215, established what is clearly the most liberal medical marijuana statute to date:

A doctor can recommend for any condition;
Dispensaries are allowed;

You needn’t have a “bona fide” doctor/patient relationship;
Self cultivation is allowed;


Patients are protected from arrest.
 
Party on Grarth Cypress!!!

Agreed, but the bar was set so low with Ashcroft busting Tommy for selling glass, rain man could have done better than Bush.
 
That may be an exageration but it sure would help.

Its also something the American people can make themselves.
 
That may be an exageration but it sure would help.

Its also something the American people can make themselves.

Cali says they'd collect 1 billion annually in taxes. The cash value is greater than wine from Napa. Plus you have to add in the productivity and reducted cost of not JAILING 800,000 young minorities annually.
 
leave it to the partisan hack sighpress to try and turn this into a bash the south thread....there are plenty of blue states that do not have medical marijuana, to turn this into a divisive south or conservative thread issue does nothing to advance the cause of legalization or federal medical marijuana laws.
 
leave it to the partisan hack sighpress to try and turn this into a bash the south thread....there are plenty of blue states that do not have medical marijuana, to turn this into a divisive south or conservative thread issue does nothing to advance the cause of legalization or federal medical marijuana laws.

there need to be a lot more moderate pro pot repubs like you, freak, and damo.
 
leave it to the partisan hack sighpress to try and turn this into a bash the south thread....there are plenty of blue states that do not have medical marijuana, to turn this into a divisive south or conservative thread issue does nothing to advance the cause of legalization or federal medical marijuana laws.

Maybe, you should think of it as a competitive taunt. Those "teams" are trailing, after all.
 
I like the "re-legalization" frame as opposed to talking about "de-criminalization." Looks like NORML has been doing some poll testing.
 
I like the "re-legalization" frame as opposed to talking about "de-criminalization." Looks like NORML has been doing some poll testing.

yeah, but you have to sometimes crawl before you run.

While I think it's worse than beer prohibition, putting people in jail for possession is Ghestapo like. So if decrim is all I can get, I'll take it.

Somebody wake up Obama
 
yeah, but you have to sometimes crawl before you run.

While I think it's worse than beer prohibition, putting people in jail for possession is Ghestapo like. So if decrim is all I can get, I'll take it.

Somebody wake up Obama

lol obama still hasn't even done anything with the SEC. hes got to be the most impotent president of all times so far.
 
leave it to the partisan hack sighpress to try and turn this into a bash the south thread....there are plenty of blue states that do not have medical marijuana, to turn this into a divisive south or conservative thread issue does nothing to advance the cause of legalization or federal medical marijuana laws.

Man, someone needs to get stoned and mellow out. :cig:


TOPSPIN wrote: Cali says they'd collect 1 billion annually in taxes. The cash value is greater than wine from Napa. Plus you have to add in the productivity and reducted cost of not JAILING 800,000 young minorities annually.

Plus, unlike alcohol, it makes people mellow. Case in point: A conservative flying off the handle, getting angry, and taking a message board post way to seriously; aka, Yurt.


Here's a guarantee, topper: get those wife-beater shirt wearing assholes off the beer and turn them onto the mary jane and you'd have less kids and wives being beaten up.
 
Here's a guarantee, topper: get those wife-beater shirt wearing assholes off the beer and turn them onto the mary jane and you'd have less kids and wives being beaten up.[/QUOTE]

Don't I know it Garth, shit stoners drive a lot slower. Can't fight in the first place and certainly don't want to when high unless it's wrestling for the dorrito's bag.
 
Back
Top