The Tesla hype

Oh their profitability?


http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=TSLA+Key+Statistics

Here faggot, chew on that for a while. Look at their ROA and their ROI. It is shit. They are a shitty company and even your fellow dicksucker Topspin says they are overvalued. As far as giving you a "quote" that someone said they ONLY sell cars, no such quote exists. Of course it is a safe assumption that a car company sells cars right dumb fuck rump ranger?

You be PWND again bitch bastard


That's it...make another attempt at moving those goalposts so you won't have to admit what a shit-slinging tool you truly are...ROTFLMAO!

At least you finally had the backbone to finally admit your claim people were touting Tesla's profitability as being "100% due to selling cars" was total bullshit!

I am concerned however with the homoerotic language peppering your post...it clearly indicates you've got something on your mind...almost as if you're hiding something and need to "let it out" so to speak.

Is there something you'd like to tell everyone?
 
Yet.

Like any new tech. End of story.

I win. You are a loser.

It's almost as if ILA is stupid enough to believe a start-up company should be IMMEDIATELY practical, cost efficient and must "fly off the shelves" immediately upon release.

Wait one minute...

ILA's statement proves he is indeed stupid enough to buy such nonsense.
 
It's almost as if ILA is stupid enough to believe a start-up company should be IMMEDIATELY practical, cost efficient and must "fly off the shelves" immediately upon release.

Wait one minute...

ILA's statement proves he is indeed stupid enough to buy such nonsense.

Did I ever say that shit for brains? Not once did I make that claim. What I maintain is that the gobblement SHOULD not be in the business of loaning ANY company money. It is nothing more than picking winners and losers (they mostly pick winners)

If Tesla can stand on their own, then God bless em. But, they can't stand on their own.

If you don't understand that distinction then you are too stupid to continue this conversation with.

This is where you spout off some ThinkProgress nonsense of "what about the oil subsidies". So let me address that non sequitur right now. They oil companies pay MORE their fair share of taxes. So you can shove that notion right up your ass.
 
Did I ever say that shit for brains? Not once did I make that claim. What I maintain is that the gobblement SHOULD not be in the business of loaning ANY company money. It is nothing more than picking winners and losers (they mostly pick winners)

And yet here you are:

they are not practical nor cost effective. PERIOD

If they were, they would be flying off the lots. They are NOT.

End of story. I win. You lose

Making just such a claim.

If Tesla can stand on their own, then God bless em. But, they can't stand on their own.

They ARE standing on their own...they just paid back the loan from the Government.

If you don't understand that distinction then you are too stupid to continue this conversation with.

And yet I'm not the one who keeps getting their claims shot down...that would be Y-O-U!

This is where you spout off some ThinkProgress nonsense of "what about the oil subsidies". So let me address that non sequitur right now. They oil companies pay MORE their fair share of taxes. So you can shove that notion right up your ass.


I said NOTHING about Big Oil, but hey, your double standard is shining brightly for all to see!

Y-O-U believe Government subsidies for Big Oil is GOOD, but Government LOANS to help a startup company is BAD.
 
Back
Top