The Supreme Court has been destroyed — and the perpetrator thinks he's the victim

This is why it's called, "The Bill of Prohibitions".

Absurdity; the last desperate refuge for the ignorant, the dishonest and the stupid.

You sad, uneducated caricature of ignorance and stupidity. The Bill of Rights doesn't bestow rights, it tells Government what they cannot do to trample those rights already presumed to exist. Moron.
 
Go ahead, let's see them.

No Marty, you read them and get back to us when you see words that suggest we have rights. If you read it, with a comprehension level above third grade, you will see it is a document that prevents GOVERNMENT intrusion on presumed rights we already have.

Again, for the mentally and reading impaired; the Constitution is not a document that bestows rights, but one that prevents Government intrusion on those PRESUMED rights inherent to all of us.
 
They serve at the peoples pleasure

WRONG again mental case. They serve the Constitution. I know that Fascist lying leftist halfwits like you don't like it. But that's our Republican Democracy at work. Move to Zimbabwe. It's more your kind of third world shit hole.
 
I do not know what Thomas thinks, but when he was being questioned about his treatment of Anita Hill, he responded by calling it a "public lynching". I expected him to do it again. He is doing that now. Fuck Thomas.
 
I do not know what Thomas thinks, but when he was being questioned about his treatment of Anita Hill, he responded by calling it a "public lynching". I expected him to do it again. He is doing that now. Fuck Thomas.

democrats like you cannot stand one of those "uppity" blacks. Back to the plantation for him....right? STFU.
 
I do not know what Thomas thinks, but when he was being questioned about his treatment of Anita Hill, he responded by calling it a "public lynching". I expected him to do it again. He is doing that now. Fuck Thomas.

white-liberals-scared-corner-black-conservatives.jpg
 
Democrats like you cannot stand one of those "uppity" blacks. Back to the plantation for him....right? STFU.

That is absolutely wrong. You should be ashamed for saying dishonest crap like that.
Thomas is doing real damage to the respect and belief in an institution that needs to be respected and trusted. He is doing damage and you go off of racism tangents. Part of his problem is omitting his WHITE wife's income in his yearly statements. He is not interested in being open and honest. The Supremes rest on a foundation that requires the people to believe in it. He is eroding that worse than any justice ever.
 
One definition of a debate "idiot" might be a member who fails to comprehend what is meant by "eliminate the constitutional right to abortion".

What "constitutional right" is that?

Abortion?

It's nowhere in the United States Constitution.

Perhaps you're looking at the Chinese Communist Party instead? Most democrats have far more loyalty to the CCP, after all.
 
Last edited:
There is no constitutional right to an abortion

You can’t eliminate something that doesn’t exist

Don’t think I am the idiot here

The fascists not only think abortion is a constitutional right, they think it is the ONLY constitutional right.

Most democrats have never read the Constitution and think it goes like this;

"We hold these truths to be self evident - abortion is sacred above all things, praise Moloch."

democrats are not sentient.
 
What "constitutional right" is that?

Abortion?

It's no where in the United States Constitution.

Perhaps you're looking at the Chinese Communist Party instead? Most democrats have far more loyalty to the CCP, after all.

I have tried, over and over, to educate Marty about the "enumerated powers" but he defies all efforts to be educated.

It is what it is.
 
For what benefit it may be to you low IQ ignoramuses:

The Bill of Rights is silent on many of the individual rights it established. To take one of your favorites, the Second Amendment grants the right "to bear arms". Machine guns are a type of "arms", so are atomic bombs.

Wrong, retard.

Bombs, including nuclear bombs, are MUNITIONS, not arms.

Neither may be lawfully possessed as even you know and accept. Likewise, The Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment says nothing about "a right to privacy" but the Court long ago found that this right exists under the Due Process Clause. In 1973, in the case of Roe v. Wade, the Court found a woman's right to an abortion existed as a Constitutional right under her Constitutional right to privacy. From that moment on, until Dobbs, a Constitutional right to an abortion existed under the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Some day the right is sure to exist again.

I know you're trying to repeat what some leftist site said - but you're not up to the task.

"due process clause of the 14th?"

{All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.}

Wait,

nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law

Abortion deprives the unborn victim of life. So what you're saying is there MUST be judicial review and a death warrant from a judge prior to any abortion.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top