The Spector of Permanent Democrat Rule

Maybe I'm old school in this regard, but whether it's politics, your (sports) team or at work - you go out and compete. If we're talking about strictly California then yes, Republicans would be at a structural disadvantage. But nationally we have shown we can win both Congress and the Presidency, but it's not a given nor a God given right. They (we) have to put out good candidates and a message people rally around. If we don't want Democrats in control then we do what was just stated.

But putting out bad candidates then complaining that everything is rigged so voters don't turn out and we lose as a result is, I'm sorry to say it, a losers mentality. By making excuses like we have been simply deflects from the real reason we weren't winning. It may make us feel better but it's a cop out.

2024 is being laid out on a silver platter for Republicans to take. If we F it up, that's on us. No excuses and complaining that Democrats want to win because of course they do. They are not going to not run any candidates.

I respect your opinion, Cawacko. I answered your question and your response is a bit of a deflection, IMO.

Even the weakest candidate, Herschel, was far better than Warnock.

If only 26% of voters are big Gov't Neo liberal, there has to be another reason that they dominate so many elections.
 
Last edited:
Focusing strictly on Biden misses the real point of the discussion, the idea that either party doesn't want to win every election they compete in (ok, with the caveat certain races may be unwinnable but that's getting pedantic.)

But only the Dems want one party socialist rule.
 
Maybe I'm old school in this regard, but whether it's politics, your (sports) team or at work - you go out and compete. If we're talking about strictly California then yes, Republicans would be at a structural disadvantage. But nationally we have shown we can win both Congress and the Presidency, but it's not a given nor a God given right. They (we) have to put out good candidates and a message people rally around. If we don't want Democrats in control then we do what was just stated.

But putting out bad candidates then complaining that everything is rigged so voters don't turn out and we lose as a result is, I'm sorry to say it, a losers mentality. By making excuses like we have been simply deflects from the real reason we weren't winning. It may make us feel better but it's a cop out.

2024 is being laid out on a silver platter for Republicans to take. If we F it up, that's on us. No excuses and complaining that Democrats want to win because of course they do. They are not going to not run any candidates.

I hate to tell you this, but you've already f'd it up. Beyond repair. Best of luck. You might want to rethink your candidate for President, but suit yourself.
 
Not going to happen, but what might happen is a more liberal party rises to the left of the Democrats as the main opposition in DC.

LOL, American Thinker.

The idea that a Socialist is ineligible for office is so galactically stupid that I can't possibly care what else this idiot has to say. Which is why he's on ignore. But you went ahead and quoted him. :)
 
I respect your opinion, Cawacko. I answered your question and your response is a bit of a deflection, IMO.

Even the weakest candidate, Herschel, was far better than Warnock.

If only 26% of voters are big Gov't Neo liberal, there has to be another reason that they dominate so many elections.

I totally get there are differing opinions than mine here and I can respect that. I'll offer my thoughts. Speaking strictly of the Presidency, Reagan/Bush from 1981 - 1993 was the anomaly since 1950 of one party having three straight terms. Everything else has been either eight year runs or two four year runs. Since the mid 90's Congress has been very similar. Point being not one party has dominated. If one only frequented a board like this you might think every single person votes party line but in reality there really are people who switch between parties (or purposefully stay home) and that's why we get the constant change/back and forth.

So that's where I'm coming from in not believing there's some conspiracy out there against Republicans.
 
I totally get there are differing opinions than mine here and I can respect that. I'll offer my thoughts. Speaking strictly of the Presidency, Reagan/Bush from 1981 - 1993 was the anomaly since 1950 of one party having three straight terms. Everything else has been either eight year runs or two four year runs. Since the mid 90's Congress has been very similar. Point being not one party has dominated. If one only frequented a board like this you might think every single person votes party line but in reality there really are people who switch between parties (or purposefully stay home) and that's why we get the constant change/back and forth.

So that's where I'm coming from in not believing there's some conspiracy out there against Republicans.

That doesn't really address why 26% (neo libs) of voters dominate so many elections.

I see what you are saying about presidents. But the Dems did control the house from 52 to 92, and got used to that power. I was a 3rd party voter and none of my candidates won until Pres. Trump.

Since I first voted at 18, I saw little difference between the 2 parties. Heck, in 2004, we had 2 Skull & Bones brothers running against each other.

When Bush defeated Gore, the Left denied those election results for 4 years. I voted for Nader because he was an anti corruption outsider a little bit like Trump.

When Obama won the Iowa primary, the whole racist nazi narrative started. The parties magically switched names myth, and the claims that the republicans were the party of slavery narrative really took off. And dominated Celebritydom. Even late night comedy completely changed then and became unfunny.

When Trump won, the "conspiracy" went on steroids. With meida race hoax after race hoax, and Intel agencies and media conspiring to destroy the outsider. Much like when Obama weaponized the media and the whole gov't to prove the Latino, Zimmerman, was a white supremacist. And started the police are all racists narrative resulting in the Beer Summit fiasco, and the assassinate the police movement.

Which has morphed into today's Dem pro criminal, disaster.

IMHO.
 
Last edited:
Is it possible you're pretending to be an utter idiot?

Just a few of the race hoaxes you promote, Goebbels. ...

Chauvin not guilty of racism/hate crime.
The Rittenhouse child
The Covington child
Jussie Smollet
Pres. Trump
Hands up don't shoot
Freddie Gray
Zimmerman
Nascar Noose HOAX
Cambridge police (racist Obama's beer summit fiasco)
 
Just a few of the race hoaxes you promote, Goebbels. ...

Chauvin not guilty of racism/hate crime.
The Rittenhouse child
The Covington child
Jussie Smollet
Pres. Trump
Hands up don't shoot
Freddie Gray
Zimmerman
Nascar Noose HOAX
Cambridge police (racist Obama's beer summit fiasco)

You come off as insane.
 
you're nuts

You are evil.

Why do you support these white lib plantation policies?
1. keep Black Americans trapped in Northern ghettos
2. demonize their religion and fatherhood
3. destroy their traditional families
4. deny them an education
5. encourage Black women to kill their children before they are born
6. create permanent poverty with generational welfare
7. deny them police protection
8. release criminals back into the community
9. dump infected illegals in their neighborhoods.
10. and "Lynch" Black republicans
 
You are evil.

Why do you support these white lib plantation policies?
1. keep Black Americans trapped in Northern ghettos
2. demonize their religion and fatherhood
3. destroy their traditional families
4. deny them an education
5. encourage Black women to kill their children before they are born
6. create permanent poverty with generational welfare
7. deny them police protection
8. release criminals back into the community
9. dump infected illegals in their neighborhoods.
10. and "Lynch" Black republicans

Where did I ever mention anything about that stuff?
 
I read his plantation policies list and his accusations are demented and deranged excrement that even a half-wit would roll their eyes at. Anyone saying such unapologetic drivel is either mentally lost or trolling.

From the guy who pretends to be an Asian woman, and never had a job. :palm:

White supremacist Richard Spencer votes for Joe Bidenhttps://www.dailymail.co.uk › news › article-8912091
Nov 4, 2020 — White supremacist Richard Spencer, known for popularising the term 'alt-right', posted a picture of his ballot paper saying 'To hell with ...

EDITORIAL: A racist's endorsement of Biden comes as no ...https://gazette.com › opinion › editorial-a-racists-endorse...
Aug 26, 2020 — Neo-Nazi white supremacist Richard Spencer wholeheartedly endorses Joe Biden for president. This should surprise no one familiar with Biden ..."

Spencer is a bit slow. It took him a long time to figure out the Dem media lied to him about Donald Trump being a lifelong neo naxi skinhead. How long will it take you? Hmmm.
 
Today's single goal of the democrat party is a permanent one-party rule.

Democrats tend to favor active government intrusion, while Republicans favor a more "hands-off" policy called self-determination."

In today's House and Senate, 9 members call themselves socialists. Article VI, Clause 3 of the Constitution explicitly makes them ineligible to serve. Another 15 members publicly lean socialist, but do not declare themselves, probably for electability reasons. In total, 102 representatives are members of the Democrat Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC).

The CPC advocates a universal, high quality, Medicare for all health care system, living wage laws, reductions in military expenditures, putting and end to mass incarceration, implementing swift measures to reverse climate change, immigration policies that are humane, and reparations.

We are 35 years into the takeover of the democrat party by world socialism and the World Economic Forum. The Marxist front organization guides the world within its many bodies toward one-world government. Ultra-left Pramila Jayapal is their caucus leader.

Progressives use the philosophy of 'equity', while anyone against it is called a racist.

The Democrat party has redefined our immigration policies that will reduce future scientific and technological advancement, and will see debt skyrocket. In a country (USA) that values education, hard work, and innovation we import the world's derelicts, the uneducated, pregnant women with zero skills, and zero prospects, retired people, and military-age men frequently gang related. What could go wrong?

We have an open border where invaders can sneak a dirty bomb across the border or some new biological or chemical weapon. And who knows how many have come across since Biden opened the floodgates--5 million, ten million? Who knows? What we do know is that everything that has happened was intentional.


https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/10/the_specter_of_permanent_democrat_rule.html

Advocates:

“The CPC advocates a universal, high quality, Medicare for all health care system, living wage laws, reductions in military expenditures, putting and end to mass incarceration, implementing swift measures to reverse climate change, immigration policies that are humane, and reparations.”

With the exception of reparations, all great ideas.
 
Back
Top