The Special Counsel will not bring charges in President Biden’s classified docs case.

[evince]

The cases are not the same in intent or law. Biden was found to have classified documents and quickly turned them over to archives. Are you Repub liars saying that is what Trump did? The cases are not alike.
No I am not saying Biden is the best choice for president.I never said it and did not want him to run at all. But I figured running against Trump would be easy. Biden sometimes misspeaks and gets tongue-tied. He has had to overcome a stuttering problem. Trump is just a disgusting immature jerk who only thinks of himself. Trump does not care about America or the people.

I knew he would get things done and he has


In an unbelievable atmosphere of the most obstructive party in history



The economy is soaring


Trump and the republicans are having their cheating exposed to the world


Things are going great even with an evil opposition Partys hate for this nation


He’s kicking ass


So he has stuttered since he was a child


FDR could barely walk


He kicked ass too

 

[Phantasmal]

Biden was CAUGHT with classified documents held in UNSECURED locations over a period of fifty years. He only cooperated after being CAUGHT.

The PRA places the responsibility for the custody and management of incumbent Presidential records with the President. That would be Trump. Not Biden. Not Pence. Get it?

No, the original papers were discovered during an office move.

The Biden lawyers were immediately contacted and they notified the Archives, Archives, notified the FBI and a Special Prosecutor determined, no charges, old, but no charges.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

The Special Counsel will not bring charges in President Biden’s classified docs case and MAGA is soiling their diapers.

But HERE are the real reasons President Biden was NOT prosecuted and Trump was:

1) President Biden didn't intentionally hide 'em and then lie about having 'em.

2) President Biden actually proactively approached the National Archives about the records when they were found.

The differences in these two cases should not be ignored.

There’s no two tiered justice between Democrats and Republicans — Trump deserved to be prosecuted because he actively evaded the law.

Period.

Not true. The report stated that Biden WILLFULLY retained classified documents (same as Trump is being charged) but because he's old and senile it is unlikely any jury would convict him. That's what the report, in so many words, says.

 

[ExpressLane]

It is past time to give Biden a cognitive exam.

 

[Into the Night]

The Special Counsel will not bring charges in President Biden’s classified docs case and MAGA is soiling their diapers.

But HERE are the real reasons President Biden was NOT prosecuted and Trump was:

1) President Biden didn't intentionally hide 'em and then lie about having 'em.

2) President Biden actually proactively approached the National Archives about the records when they were found.

The differences in these two cases should not be ignored.

There’s no two tiered justice between Democrats and Republicans — Trump deserved to be prosecuted because he actively evaded the law.

Period.

Paradox. Irrational.

Biden broke the law and committed espionage (an act of treason). He NEVER HAD AUTHORIZATION to have those documents at all, or keep them in his home, or to expose them to agents traveling to Ukraine and China. He lied about having them (for several YEARS), and had to be stolen for him to have them at all.

Trump never broke any law. He is authorized to retain any document he wishes, and he did.

You cannot project YOUR problems on Trump or anybody else, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

It was a misplacing, not a deliberate theft like Trump did.

BIDEN stole documents, Sock. Not Trump. BIDEN had no legal access to any of the documents he stole. BIDEN lied about those documents in his possession (illegally) for YEARS. Biden exposed those documents to agents traveling to Ukraine and China (espionage, an act of treason).

The penalty for misplacing documents is small. It amounts to a bookkeeping error.

Theft and espionage are not 'bookkeeping errors', Sock.

That's why Pence walked from his problem too.

Pence was authorized to retain any of his documents he wishes. He broke no law. It was not a 'problem' or a crime.
Trump is authorized to retain any document he wishes. He broke no law. He did not steal any document.

You cannot project YOUR problems on Trump, Pence, or anybody else, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

So you agree with the trump prosecution?



Cool

He's describing Biden, idiot.

 

[Nordberg]

It is past time to give Biden a cognitive exam.

Have you seen the test that Trump said was tough? It is so simple it is nearly humorous. They have a drawing of a hippo, a giraffe and an elephant and ask you to identify them. They ask you to draw a clock and put the numbers in and the hands to 2:30. It is embarrassing that it is a waste of time. Trump bragged about passing it and claimed they were surprised he did so well. He says it was tough. It is deliberately simple so they can see if some of your thinking is off.

 

[Into the Night]

No, the original papers were discovered during an office move.

The Biden lawyers were immediately contacted and they notified the Archives, Archives, notified the FBI and a Special Prosecutor determined, no charges, old, but no charges.

Blatant lie.
Biden had those papers illegally. The only way he could have obtained them is by theft. He lied about having them for YEARS. He exposed them to agents traveling to Ukraine and China (espionage, an act of treason). He did NOT turn the papers in until he was CAUGHT WITH THEM!

 

[Joe Capitalist]

Not true. The report stated that Biden WILLFULLY retained classified documents (same as Trump is being charged) but because he's old and senile it is unlikely any jury would convict him. That's what the report, in so many words, says.

More like "in the words of a severely radical right wing extremist". Your extreme far right bias has distorted your judgement.

And that makes it difficult, albeit impossible to accept anything you say as factual.

 

[volsrock]

The Special Counsel will not bring charges in President Biden’s classified docs case and MAGA is soiling their diapers.

But HERE are the real reasons President Biden was NOT prosecuted and Trump was:

1) President Biden didn't intentionally hide 'em and then lie about having 'em.

2) President Biden actually proactively approached the National Archives about the records when they were found.

The differences in these two cases should not be ignored.

There’s no two tiered justice between Democrats and Republicans — Trump deserved to be prosecuted because he actively evaded the law.

Period.

Man Ruled Too Senile To Stand Trial Still Fine To Run Country



It’s totally insane to think a man is too old, to mentally gone to stand trial is perfectly fine to command the US Military with nuclear weapons.



I remember 1980 when the democrats said Reagan was TOO OLD at 70 to be President


Now the dems are claiming a known brain-dead 81 year old senile man is still good enough to be President! insane!

 

[Truth Detector]

No, the original papers were discovered during an office move.

Still stuck on liar I see. Should Biden have had the documents in his possession at all? Yes or no halfwit.

The Biden lawyers were immediately contacted and they notified the Archives, Archives, notified the FBI and a Special Prosecutor determined, no charges, old, but no charges.

It doesn't matter. The FACT remains that the documents should not have been in his possession in the first place. In fact, they were not secured and readily available for anyone to see and obtain.

The law is very clear:

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.

(b) For purposes of this section, the provision of documents and materials to the Congress shall not constitute an offense under subsection (a).

(c) In this section, the term "classified information of the United States", means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.

 

[Truth Detector]

More like "in the words of a severely radical right wing extremist". Your extreme far right bias has distorted your judgement.

And that makes it difficult, albeit impossible to accept anything you say as factual. [/SIZE]

You're describing yourself, you dishonest worthless piece of human feces.

 

[ExpressLane]

Still stuck on liar I see. Should Biden have had the documents in his possession at all? Yes or no halfwit.



It doesn't matter. The FACT remains that the documents should not have been in his possession in the first place. In fact, they were not secured and readily available for anyone to see and obtain.

The law is very clear:

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.

(b) For purposes of this section, the provision of documents and materials to the Congress shall not constitute an offense under subsection (a).

(c) In this section, the term "classified information of the United States", means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.

Some of the documents in Biden's possession were smuggled out of a SCIF when he was a Senator. That is pretty damn willful.

 

[Joe Capitalist]

This message is hidden because Truth Denier is on your ignore list.

Revolutionary war troops "took over the airports".

 

[ExpressLane]

More like "in the words of a severely radical right wing extremist". Your extreme far right bias has distorted your judgement.

And that makes it difficult, albeit impossible to accept anything you say as factual.

You need to get your diastema fixed.

 

[Joe Capitalist]

You need to get your diastema fixed.

The guy you support thinks they flew airplanes in the Revolutionary War:

Revolutionary war troops "took over the airports".

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Still stuck on liar I see. Should Biden have had the documents in his possession at all? Yes or no halfwit.



It doesn't matter. The FACT remains that the documents should not have been in his possession in the first place. In fact, they were not secured and readily available for anyone to see and obtain.

The law is very clear:

18 U.S. Code § 1924 - Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.

(b) For purposes of this section, the provision of documents and materials to the Congress shall not constitute an offense under subsection (a).

(c) In this section, the term "classified information of the United States", means information originated, owned, or possessed by the United States Government concerning the national defense or foreign relations of the United States that has been determined pursuant to law or Executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure in the interests of national security.

They've added an asterisk on that: *Law does not apply to Democrats."

 

[TOP]

And Pense?

As it turns out I was 100 % correct...

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

They've added an asterisk on that: *Law does not apply to Democrats."

Retaining a personal diary is not really a violation of this law.