The Smearing Of Brett Kavanaugh Is Truly Evil

[MAGA MAN]

It has nothing to do with Kavanaugh but the left's hate for Trump. It could have been anyone and they would have done the same thing. If you think it's bad now, wait until Ginsburg keels over and Trump gets to pick another Justice.

That will be fireworks, but he's got a woman pegged for that spot...

 

[CFM]

You missed your time period, get over it, we no longer automatically believe the blacked out drunk white boys of privilege.

But you automatically believe a drunken slut. Maybe your motives are to try and get a piece of pussy instead of having to jerk off like a lonely little BOY.

 

[anatta]

i do like that we are up to gang rape now. In the space of like a week we went from normal guy to attempted rape to gang rapist lol.

wait for Creepy Porn Lawyer.
I expect his vomiting to begin Wednesday to poison the hearings

 

[Eagle_Eye]

The smearing of Brett Kavanaugh is truly necessary.

Why is that numb nuts? So you believe it is perfectly acceptable to ruin someone's reputation for pure political reasons. This has nothing to do with Kavanaugh he is just the pawn in the game of control. Trump could have nominated Mother Theresa and the left would have smeared her. I find these smear campaigns despicable.

 

[Phantasmal]

wait for Creepy Porn Lawyer.
I expect his vomiting to begin Wednesday to poison the hearings

Avenatti brought us Cohen, served on a platter. You may not like him, but he delivers and he has said his client is believable. He has to much at stake at this point to be wrong.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello anatta,

witness testimony is not "evidence"
It clearly says
your writing is mostly vaporous, but at least not offensive. props for that

There is no reason to be offensive.

And thank you as well for your candor.

You give me plenty of material to rip your arguments to shreds purely on the basis of merit.

Why on Earth do you place such faith in such unabashed propaganda?

Federalist = propaganda.

Period.

The American public deserves an investigation.

Hearings should be halted.

No vote should be held yet.

Conduct the investigation.

These allegations are serious.

We need to learn more.

It is not time to rush this through.

Republicans are making a mockery of justice and the rule of law.

That's why Kav's school, Yale, is SHUT DOWN OVER IT!!!

All those scholars are duly alarmed.

Kav reflects poorly on their institution.

An investigation could clear his sullied name.

 

[anatta]

Avenatti brought us Cohen, served on a platter. You may not like him, but he delivers and he has said his client is believable. He has to much at stake at this point to be wrong.

Cohen is a joke. His plea is a joke "non-indicted co-conspirator" he was forced to say by Mueller.

what does he have at stake? he's a bottom dweller, showing up to feed when the waters are chummed
like here by the Dems

 

[Phantasmal]

Cohen is a joke. His plea is a joke "non-indicted co-conspirator" he was forced to say by Mueller.

what does he have at stake? he's a bottom dweller, showing up to feed when the waters are chummed
like here by the Dems

Lol, predictable answer from you. Avenatti also gave us Trump’s accountant.

 

[anatta]

Hello anatta,



There is no reason to be offensive.

And thank you as well for your candor.

You give me plenty of material to rip your arguments to shreds purely on the basis of merit.

Why on Earth do you place such faith in such unabashed propaganda?

Federalist = propaganda.

Period.

The American public deserves an investigation.

Hearings should be halted.

No vote should be held yet.

Conduct the investigation.

These allegations are serious.

We need to learn more.

It is not time to rush this through.

Republicans are making a mockery of justice and the rule of law.

That's why Kav's school, Yale, is SHUT DOWN OVER IT!!!

All those scholars are duly alarmed.

Kav reflects poorly on their institution.

An investigation could clear his sullied name.

dude it's been explained over and over their is nothing to investigate. There is no evidence.
There is only testimony which the Senate can hear. It's not the FBI job to gather testimony.

Federalist is a solid site, with emphasis on federalism (balance of powers).
In jurors cases it looks for "originalists" (lacking a better word this AM)

you might not care about such construct, but it's how the Constitution is set up.

 

[anatta]

Lol, predictable answer from you. Avenatti also gave us Trump’s accountant.

KAI?
Cohen is much more then "Trump's accountant" and that has nothing to do with Trump.

I realize ANY smear is fine by you as long as it's by a woman, but some of us don't just "believe"
If you believe K ran a train -then you are so far gone it's not worth discussing it.

You and Avenatti can wallow in it for all I care. The Dems were on record against ANY judge.
Which shows you none of this is in good faith, except for perhaps -perhaps- ford .
and her's is a recovered memory at that.

The Dems are masters of the slime. we've seen it over and over.

 

[Phantasmal]

KAI?
Cohen is much more then "Trump's accountant" and that has nothing to do with Trump.

I realize ANY smear is fine by you as long as it's by a woman, but some of us don't just "believe"
If you believe K ran a train -then you are so far gone it's not worth discussing it.

You and Avenatti can wallow in it for all I care. The Dems were on record against ANY judge.
Which shows you none of this is in good faith, except for perhaps -perhaps- ford .
and her's is a recovered memory at that.

The Dems are masters of the slime. we've seen it over and over.

You are confusing the two women, Ford wasn’t a recovered memory, get your facts straight.

Cohen wasn’t Trump’s accountant, I was talking about Weiselberg, remember him.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hell anatta,

dude it's been explained over and over their is nothing to investigate.

By whom? Those who wish to rush this confirmation through for partisan reasons?

What's the big rush??????

There is no evidence.

There is only testimony which the Senate can hear. It's not the FBI job to gather testimony.

Incorrect. Finding witnesses is crucial to learning background used for justification of an up or down vote.

Federalist is a solid site,

No, it is propaganda.

with emphasis on federalism (balance of powers).

The bias is purely toward reducing the size of government so that the powerful can become richer.

In jurors cases it looks for "originalists" (lacking a better word this AM)

It looks for anything which supports the highly opinionated narrative. It is biased.

you might not care about such construct, but it's how the Constitution is set up.

That is opinion. You are accepting opinion as fact, a classic mistake.

The Federalist doesn't emphasize anything which doesn't support the narrative.

Who gives the most money to the Federalist to operate? (I bet you don't want to know - won't answer)

 

[Fentoine Lum]

You are confusing the two women, Ford wasn’t a recovered memory, get your facts straight.

Cohen wasn’t Trump’s accountant, I was talking about Weiselberg, remember him.

Straight facts won't hold up to scrutiny, that's what alternative facts are for.

 

[anatta]

You are confusing the two women, Ford wasn’t a recovered memory, get your facts straight.

Cohen wasn’t Trump’s accountant, I was talking about Weiselberg, remember him.

She recalled under psychotherapy? recovered is the buzz word. repressed is the psych term,
but the fact she was able to recall past the repression just shows trauma - it does not show she has an accurate memory.

I remember the guy. what does Creepy Porn Lawyer have to do with it? ( I forget any connection)
All I've seen is he directed Cohen to make the payments - hush money for a Non-Disclosure Agreement
isn't illegal and it's a common enough practive..

anyways.. enjoy the train,,isn't it exciting?

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Maybe Brett Kavanaugh is a gang-raping attempted murderer who managed to live a public life of acclaim and honor. Maybe the devotion to his wife and two daughters, his respect for countless women and their careers, and his wisdom on the bench are parts of an elaborate plot to get away with it. Anything is possible.

But the idea that the country should convict him and destroy his life with no evidence other than recovered and uncorroborated memories and creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti’s say-so is quite insane.

President Donald Trump, who was elected by people who cared deeply about fighting the progressive takeover of the courts, nominated Brett Kavanaugh to fill Anthony Kennedy’s seat. D.C. establishment figures on the right revere Kavanaugh, and praise his extensive judicial record. Before meeting with him or holding hearings, most Democratic senators said they planned to vote against him.

The hearings ricocheted from interesting discussions of judicial philosophy to clownish “I am Spartacus” moments and radical abortion protesters screaming about their love of killing unborn children.

Only upon completion did Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein release news that she’d sat on a claim of sexual assault for six weeks. The media then began running with uncorroborated and disputed allegations ranging from Christine Blasey Ford saying she thought Kavanaugh was trying to rape her and might kill her to Avenatti suggesting that Kavanaugh is a gang raper.

Republicans on the Judiciary Committee — in part thanks to Sen. Jeff Flake, cowering in the face of a smear campaign — bent over backwards to accommodate the first accuser, no matter how outlandish her requests to delay the hearing. As was easily predictable, the media and other resistance members put forth additional claims — somehow even less substantiated than the initial one — as the days passed.

Kavanaugh isn’t facing criminal prosecution in part because his accusers have come nowhere near the standard required for criminal prosecution.
And senators predisposed to vote against him are not the definition of an impartial jury.
That does not mean disputed allegations should form the basis of destroying a man’s life, career, and reputation. It also does not mean that a precedent should be established of allowing the left to weaponize use of disputed allegations to thwart the seating of justices.

some in the media are running multiple stories based on reputation-destroying allegations that have not come close to meeting a journalistic standard.

The New Yorker’s laughably disreputable Jane Mayer and previously well-regarded Ronan Farrow wrote up a story claiming that a progressive activist recovered a memory of sexual assault only after being prodded by Senate Democrats to do so.
Even The New York Times — which doesn’t have a sterling track record when it comes to running with wild accusations — interviewed dozens of people in an attempt to corroborate the allegation and was not able to do so. They found that the accuser Deborah Ramirez had recently told classmates she could not be certain Kavanaugh was the man who she says exposed himself to her.

Are Our Senators All Children?

Democratic senators announced at the outset of the Kavanaugh nomination that they would do what it took to stop him. They have held to their word, believing that any means necessary is morally defensible.

Republican senators, however, seem to lack the discernment to understand when they’re getting played by people who hate them and want them destroyed.

It’s not just that they’re losing a political battle, but that they’re allowing Democrats and the media to destroy a man and his family for political gain. There is no virtue in allowing a man to be smeared without evidence.

At some point one must consider whether evil means are justified for progressive ends. The bottom line is that this media-enabled Democratic smear campaign simply can’t be the standard by which we destroy people. Watching this miscarriage of justice is radicalizing those who care about rule of law and political processes that have a semblance of sanity.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/09/24/the-smear-campaign-against-brett-kavanaugh-is-truly-evil/

Awwww! Awww! Awwww! Poor little sensitive Republicans can't handle a little taste of their own medicine!!! Awwwww!!! You poor babies! LOL LOL LOL

By the way, shouldn't we put a hold on a vote for Kavanaugh until after the midterm so the people can have their say? LOL LOL LOL

I'll give you credit Anatta...you have a great big set of balls to create such a hypocritical thread. Thanks for the laugh!

 

[Mott the Hoople]

The smearing of Brett Kavanaugh is truly necessary.

I don't know if it's neccessary and the partisanship is going to far and it's affecting good governance. On the political front though pay backs are a mother fucker and listening to right wing partisans piss their panties over Kavanaugh's treatment is fucking hillarious.

What did they expect after Garland? Dems to just roll over? Fucking morons. LOL

 

[Phantasmal]

She recalled under psychotherapy? recovered is the buzz word. repressed is the psych term,
but the fact she was able to recall past the repression just shows trauma - it does not show she has an accurate memory.

I remember the guy. what does Creepy Porn Lawyer have to do with it? ( I forget any connection)
All I've seen is he directed Cohen to make the payments - hsh money for a Non-Disclosre Agreement isn't illegal'and it's a common enough practive..

anyways.. enjoy the train,,isn't it exciting?

I need to see your proof she recovered this memory under psychotherapy, I have not read this in any account I have read. Thank you

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Truly evil is a moral judgement, but I can go with it.

Judge K is like the perfect choir boy. No sex until marriage ( or maybe the "serious" g/f stage).
He was captain of the basketball team.
A serious student -not a partier
Lifetime friendships with women he knew and wrote the 65 supporting letter

He's like Dudley Do-right..but the Dems
( who are controlling the Ford affair -Brian Fallon is running the show- Deborah Katz is the atty)
don't give a shit. they gladly practice the politics of personal destruction

Awwww! Poor little choir boy can't handle big boy politics. LOL LOL LOL

Fuck him. If Kavanaugh can't handle the heat then he'd probably suck as a SCOTUS Jurtice anyway.

This shit is beyond funny! LOL

 

[Phantasmal]

She recalled under psychotherapy? recovered is the buzz word. repressed is the psych term,
but the fact she was able to recall past the repression just shows trauma - it does not show she has an accurate memory.

I remember the guy. what does Creepy Porn Lawyer have to do with it? ( I forget any connection)
All I've seen is he directed Cohen to make the payments - hush money for a Non-Disclosure Agreement
isn't illegal and it's a common enough practive..

anyways.. enjoy the train,,isn't it exciting?

He flipped after Cohen, all due to Avenatti and Stormy, that is what it has to do with Avenatti, Stormy and Avenatti exposed the whole mess.

 

[Mott the Hoople]

Your ends justify the means?

More like pay backs are a bitch. LOL LOL LOL