The smart money is starting to abandon the CO2 vessel

Dude, you almost but not quite made the logic leap. Tom is a shill for BP. He doesn't even try to deny it.

Typical Leftist bullshit, it is a tactic that is deployed with alarming regularity to attempt to shut down discussion. I would also point out that you can ask just about anybody in the UK about how BP was treated by Obama and the US public and you would get the same and more.
 
Last edited:
Typical Leftist bullshit, it is a tactic that is deployed with alarming regularity to attempt to shut down discussion. I would also point out that you can ask just about anybody in the UK about how BP was treated by Obama and the US public and you would get the same and more.

I will gleefully point out that BP gas stations are closing their doors here one after another, and that you are more anti-enviroment than any "scientist" I ever met.(this thread being a perfect example, but go ahead and deny reality, you are a professional denier after all.)
 
Listen fuckwit if you weren't such a prick you would know that I asked why BP was taking all the flak when Halliburton and Transocean were seemingly getting off scotfree. BP faced up to its responsibilties unlike the likes of Dow, Union Carbide, Exxon, Chevron, Occidental Petroleum, Monsanto et al. Of course in typical fashion the corrupt legal system in Louisiana has done its best to milk them for all they are worth.

http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/09/07/lawyers-plotted-to-corrupt-bp-oil-spill-settlement-program-prob/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...n-BP-Gulf-of-Mexico-settlement-programme.html

Anyway back to the issue in hand if you cannot stay on topic then I will threadban in future as you are rapidly becoming a waste of space.

Ohhh! String really busted Tom's veins here. Awesome!
 
I will gleefully point out that BP gas stations are closing their doors here one after another, and that you are more anti-enviroment than any "scientist" I ever met.(this thread being a perfect example, but go ahead and deny reality, you are a professional denier after all.)

Looks like that whole BP shill thing really hit a nerve...
 
I will gleefully point out that BP gas stations are closing their doors here one after another, and that you are more anti-enviroment than any "scientist" I ever met.(this thread being a perfect example, but go ahead and deny reality, you are a professional denier after all.)

I am against the alarmist bullshit propagated by the likes of you, Prof Shyster and yourself are totally unable to answer any of the pionts raised in the OP which is why you deploy the usual tactics of attempting to derail the thread instead.
 
You are such an effing tool, it was you that were thanking all the time when he was espousing his GM bullshit.

So one can't agree with another about one topic and disagree about another? I made my opinion of Stringfellow's defence of GM products abundantly clear.
Pretty concrete thinking on your part Mr. Openmindedness.
 
So one can't agree with another about one topic and disagree about another? I made my opinion of Stringfellow's defence of GM products abundantly clear.
Pretty concrete thinking on your part Mr. Openmindedness.

Well seeing as you like using the tactic of attempting to discredit somebody by referring to something totally unrelated, I 'd say that I was learning from the master.
 
Come on, debate championette, show everyone some of those fearsome debating skills and address the topic rather than giggling like a schoolgirl watching the boys fighting.

Now you are coining misogynistic terms? That really strengthens your argument, LOL.
 
Now you are coining misogynistic terms? That really strengthens your argument, LOL.

Fight fire with fire, I say. By the way, if you think that I will stop posting about climate alarmism then you don't know me very well. I will aslo say that if you cannot address the topic then I will thread ban you.
 
I am against the alarmist bullshit propagated by the likes of you, Prof Shyster and yourself are totally unable to answer any of the pionts raised in the OP which is why you deploy the usual tactics of attempting to derail the thread instead.

Hardly. Your repetitive false claims bore me nearly to death. You are among the vast minority of "scientists" who continue to deny reality (less than 3%).
Of those, the vast majority admittedly are employed by oil or chemical companies.

Why not admit your alliance, fuck off, and have a nice day?

The very idea that closing ancient nuclear power plants is bad discredits your entire article, to say nothing of it's source. Furthermore, while I disagree with Monty that the Germans do "everything right", they are certainly leading the world in many areas as we speak.

Despite your unbelievably stupid interpretation of their alternative energy solutions, they have produced untold amounts of clean energy and since solar photo-voltaic panels have no known failure date, payoff is inevitable, all the more so due to rising energy costs and inflation in general, to say nothing of the true costs of burning fossil fuels.
 
Fight fire with fire, I say. By the way, if you think that I will stop posting about climate alarmism then you don't know me very well. I will aslo say that if you cannot address the topic then I will thread ban you.

Thread ban me if you must, lol. You certainly have a need to disable any who disagree, since your position is untenable.

If you were not such a fool, you would see me as a valuable ally overall, but a paid shill must do what he is paid for, so carry on, by all means. We all need to earn a living.
 
Listen fuckwit if you weren't such a prick you would know that I asked why BP was taking all the flak when Halliburton and Transocean were seemingly getting off scotfree. BP faced up to its responsibilties unlike the likes of Dow, Union Carbide, Exxon, Chevron, Occidental Petroleum, Monsanto et al. Of course in typical fashion the corrupt legal system in Louisiana has done its best to milk them for all they are worth.

http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/09/07/lawyers-plotted-to-corrupt-bp-oil-spill-settlement-program-prob/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/...n-BP-Gulf-of-Mexico-settlement-programme.html

Anyway back to the issue in hand if you cannot stay on topic then I will threadban in future as you are rapidly becoming a waste of space.

It is such a strange thing for a person to feel some allegiance to a corporation. It's weird and unhealthy even for a stockholder.

I am on topic. Your article is conspiratard nonsense. It's just a bunch of ad hom garbage about how some might profit and unsubstantiated claims about influence peddling. It's the same attack you use on GMOs and the only real argument you have. There is always opportunity for individuals to make money on every side of an issue. I am sure Watts has found it a lucrative to whore himself out, but he has no real scientific credentials or credibility to maintain and so he is not a going concern in that field.

The article is absolutely wrong....

So forget about any claims of “pure” science, ignore colorful screenshots and simply sniff for the smell of money – and you’ll be on the right trail.

This might as well be a white flag, an admission that the science is not on their side and so the only hope is to cast aspersions.
 
Back
Top