The sheer idiocy of the leftists

anonymoose said:
I used The Guardian rated left leaning by AllSides and Economic Times rated “least biased” by AllSides.




To make you feel stupid.
Click to expand...
So?

As I noted, he contributed less than seven million over a eight year time span, averaging less than a million a year, you think a million dollars was going to put millions of Americans in the street protesting all across America?

And the pisser is so what, Soros contributes millions to left leaning organizations just as Musk, the Koch Brothers, and Harlan Crow just to name a few billionaires contribute millions to right leaning organizations
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Some would. They are the ones too heavily invested in Leftist dogma and ideas that they can't back out. There'd be nothing left for them. So, they continue on regardless.
Click to expand...


Maybe. I've noticed that many leftists are seemingly ruled by their emotions.

"Follow the money" also might explain the dogged maintenance of the charade for a small elite group that makes a living from "useful idiots".
 
Diogenes said:
Maybe. I've noticed that many leftists are seemingly ruled by their emotions.

"Follow the money" also might explain the dogged maintenance of the charade for a small elite group that makes a living from "useful idiots".
Click to expand...
Most on the Left are shallow thinkers. They base their ideas on emotional desires and the idea that somehow, they've been given the short end of the stick so-to-speak. The hardcore Left play on those desires with proposals to make things "fair and equal." Their real intent is simply to gain power and wealth by using the mentally deficient.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Most on the Left are shallow thinkers. They base their ideas on emotional desires and the idea that somehow, they've been given the short end of the stick so-to-speak. The hardcore Left play on those desires with proposals to make things "fair and equal." Their real intent is simply to gain power and wealth by using the mentally deficient.
Click to expand...


I suspect that you're correct.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Because they do and they know it. They want to ruin the lives of those they disagree with. I could care less when the anti-fascist movements began. That's just an irrelevant appeal to history. What's important is what those self-proclaimed movements are doing today. In the 80's and on, the KKK has been an irrelevant, tiny, nothing on political radar. Name a public protest held by the KKK from roughly 1980 to today. I can't. I've heard nothing about the group really in the last 30 years other than that the exist from mostly voices on the Left.

I don't need to provide specific documentation on those photos. They exist, as do thousands of others, of Antifa protests worldwide. The point of the photos was to counter the specific argument that "They are a few people on computers. They have no funding and no power." Clearly, those two statements by Nordberg are inaccurate and wrong by the simplest photographic evidence. That was the point of them.
Click to expand...
Your own fucking reference (csis.org), confirmed EXACTLY what Nordberg and I have been saying. You merely failed to read and comprehend your own citation. Again
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top