The same people who fell for WMD are now Trumppers.

Cypress said:
No link needed.
You were here on JPP in the early days, and on fullpolitics before that.

Almost to a man, Republican posters defended and supported the invasion of Iraq, while liberal posters were universally against it.
Click to expand...
So, no link.

This is a current event, how?
 
Jarod said:
I am glad they are talking, however I have little faith PP will stand up to him.
Click to expand...
History does not support that.

B-2’s, the Israeli-Hamas war that started on the vegetable’s watch…the Russian economy is a mess, thanks to President Trump.

The support for Ukraine, causing a million Russian deaths in Ukraine.

Where have you been the last six months?
 
Jarod said:
Despite all the evidence and lack of it, the yahoos were desperatly sure Saddam had WMD, and used that as justification to send over 4000 American troops who were killed in the war, and agreed to spend billions on the Iraq war, are the ones who fall for all the PP shit, and refuse to see the evidence of his wrongdoing.

There is a certain personality type in America, who get whipped into a delusional political frenzy by this particular manipulation.

Everyone I knew who was desperately supporting the Iraq war, is a Trumpper today.
Click to expand...
The FBI interrogator that spent months interrogating Saddam said because Saddam was very afraid of Iran he thought if the US thought he had WMDs so would Iran. He thought if Iran believed Iraq had WMDs they would not attack Iraq. He thought the UN would stop the US from attacking Iraq. So he carried out a ruse to make the US believe he had WMDs. In poker that is called a bluff. Bush called his bluff.
 
Earl said:
History does not support that.

B-2’s, the Israeli-Hamas war that started on the vegetable’s watch…the Russian economy is a mess, thanks to President Trump.

The support for Ukraine, causing a million Russian deaths in Ukraine.

Where have you been the last six months?
Click to expand...
Under a rock making dumb troll threads.
 
Earl said:
AI says it was:

Here's why it was a good deal:
  • Natural Resources:
    Alaska is rich in resources like gold, oil, timber, and fish, which have contributed significantly to the U.S. economy.

    • Strategic Importance:
      Alaska's location provides strategic advantages, especially during the Cold War, and is vital for national security.
    • Expansion and Growth:
      The purchase added a large piece of land, increasing the size of the United States by nearly 20% and facilitating further expansion and trade.
    • Cost-Effectiveness:
      The purchase price of $7.2 million, which translates to roughly two cents per acre, was a bargain considering the vast resources and strategic value of the territory.
While there were initial concerns and maintenance costs associated with Alaska, the long-term benefits and economic contributions have far outweighed the initial investment.
Click to expand...
Didn't Russia need to sell Alaska to pay for the Crimean war?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top