the right refuses to back this country and lie non stop about our leadership

ZoomZoom said:
From any military/diplomatic standpoint, the ground war in the ISIS held regions must happen. Air support only is NOT getting the job done and the people of that region are NOT much help. That dynamic MUST change.
Click to expand...

Are you talking U.S./Nato troops on the ground?
 
I'm not so certain that most republicans hate this country, evince. But the majority of them absolutely hate our President. They can answer for that on their own but generally and so far we've heard not much other than lies from them about it. They have some very deep seated fears and suspicions about President Barack Hussein Obama. I think they need to speak with their psychiatrists about most of it.
 
StormX














StormX is online now
Verified User



Join Date:Sep 2013Posts:1,902Thanks:230Thanked 1,038 Times in 737 Posts Groans:17 Groaned 311 Times in 251 Posts


Default







StormX














StormX is online now
Verified User



Join Date:Sep 2013Posts:1,902Thanks:230Thanked 1,038 Times in 737 Posts Groans:17 Groaned 311 Times in 251 Posts


Default




why do you battle our own government in this fight you evil fuck
 
cawacko said:
Are you talking U.S./Nato troops on the ground?
Click to expand...

I generally support what is happening now except in a larger way. That being special forces with intense intelligence contingents and targeting very specific high value entities. We are very capable of running a ground war with a tremendous amount more precision than ever in the past.
 
ZoomZoom said:
I generally support what is happening now except in a larger way. That being special forces with intense intelligence contingents and targeting very specific high value entities. We are very capable of running a ground war with a tremendous amount more precision than ever in the past.
Click to expand...

What's your take on the no-fly zone? Think it's a viable option?
 
cawacko said:
What's your take on the no-fly zone? Think it's a viable option?
Click to expand...
I don't think a no-fly zone is viable or advisable. I DO think that when we see aircraft from wherever (Russia) targeting civilians that we should take them out. But mostly I want the peoples that reside in that area to take more responsibility for their own safety.

Our newspapers and other media constantly remind us of the "muslim aggression" against us. The newspapers and other media over there constantly remind that population of the American and subsequently christian aggression against them. It's almost impossible, but it can be dealt with.
 
ZoomZoom said:
I don't think a no-fly zone is viable or advisable. I DO think that when we see aircraft from wherever (Russia) targeting civilians that we should take them out. But mostly I want the peoples that reside in that area to take more responsibility for their own safety.

Our newspapers and other media constantly remind us of the "muslim aggression" against us. The newspapers and other media over there constantly remind that population of the American and subsequently christian aggression against them. It's almost impossible, but it can be dealt with.
Click to expand...

I agree with you in wanting to see locals take more control of their own security but as you stated that isn't really happening and so many innocents are stuck in the middle. I don't really know the answer. The status quo isn't really working but sending in troops or completely backing out of the area is no panacea either. Tough position.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top