Have you made a single post ever on this forum that didn't involve childish insults?
Yes I have; many, many times. Even on this thread in post #5.
Why do you care? Do you want to display some more of that selective outrage where you contribute absolutely nothing to the thread but instead selectively whine like a small minded little vagina man about Conservatives?
Why don’t you ever complain and whine about the vulgar insults that erupt from your fellow lefttards?
And you wonder why I call you a whiney dunce?
You are an ignorant statist. You have no opinion and you are simply a parrot of idiots.
Wrong again whiney vagina man; but then, wrong seems to be a permanent state of mind with whiney vagina men who spam threads with their selective outrage isn’t it?
Amazingly, you address genius and idiot in the exact same fashion. You don't even have the judgement to realize who is an actual idiot and who isn't.
This sentence, as is typical with many of your third grade level posts, it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. But then, that is pretty normal for you isn’t whiney vagina man?
At least your friend Taft isn't an idiot, even if he/she is confused and wrong about just about all his beliefs.
How is Taft my friend? Have we had drinks together? Did he tell you I was his buddy?
Dunce.
Show us you can debate, and reply without insult, but rather fact, even once. You can't.
I’ll tell you what whiney vagina man; when you learn to stop spamming threads with your selective whiney vagina man bullshit and actually debate a thread topic without your ignorant selective bullshit and personal insults, I will be happy to debate you head on.
You see, I don’t call you a dunce because I want to insult you; I call you and Maineman, Dante's, evince and the veritable cabal of ignorant leftist dimwits who spam this forum with their outrageous nonsense and vulgar stupidity dunces for the simple fact that you dimwits really are dunces. It isn’t any more complicated than that.
I have yet to see you make a coherent argument that wasn’t a personal insult or contained anything more substantive than “because you say so.”
So let’s get started now; how about we start with the idiotic premise of this thread… do Republicans approach poverty from the inside out, whatever that moronic claim means, if so how so, and do Democrats really have a solution that isn’t the same old tired bullshit they always have tried? I’ll check back later for your intelligent response to the threads idiotic premise.
