The Queers double standard!

Jeebus bravs you are one desperate rightie. This urban legend goes back 40 years and Paul Fray isn't very credible either.

Paul Fray

Fray was the target of the alleged 1974 "(expletive) Jew bastard" comment. As an Associated Press story points out, Fray "can no longer practice law because someone paid him to alter a court document and he surrendered his law license to the Arkansas Supreme Court in 1980. He suffered a cerebral hemorrhage that led to seizures, addiction to prescription pain killers, erratic behavior and memory loss, according to court records. He wrote a letter to Clinton begging her forgiveness for saying things about her 'without factual foundation.'"

NewsMax says nothing about Fray's letter or his disbarment, but briefly mentions his memory problems, buried deep in a story and cited as evidence that "the White House and its media allies" was trying to "discredit" Fray.

Author David Brock says in the July 20 New York Times that he interviewed Fray and his wife in 1995 for his book, "The Seduction of Hillary Rodham," who said nothing then about the alleged slur. Two other authors of Clinton tomes, Gail Sheehy and David Maraniss, report the same thing, according to the New York Daily News. Additionally, Sheehy says that Neill McDonald, another witness to the alleged slur, "told me he didn't hear it," the Daily News reports.

Newsday columnist Marie Cocco points out that Brock recounts in his book why the argument started: Hillary and Fray's wife were protesting a plan by Fray to swing Bill Clinton's unsuccessful 1974 bid for Congress by bribing officials to rig absentee ballots. David Maraniss goes into further detail in his book, "First In His Class."

And the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette quotes Drew Ponder, another former campaign aide, as saying Fray "was dissension personified. ... He has no credibility with me."
The Media Research Center, meanwhile, is offended that Geraldo Rivera dared to question Fray's credibility at all. However, the MRC doesn't bother to print Fray's response to the question, instead referring to the diversionary tactic of comparing Fray to President Clinton.

http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2000/slur.html


What are you saying?

That another God fearing Rightie was so desperate he resorted to citing long ago discredited nonsense from one of the worst partisan hate sites on the net?

It's just so unlike him...NOT!
 
:rofl2:

What do you call a black woman who gets an abortion?

A member of Crime Stoppers of America.


Whats the difference between a black man and a large pizza?

A pizza can feed a family of four.


There is a 3 story apartment building with 1 apartment on each floor. A white family lives on the top floor. A mexican family lives on the second floor. A black family lives on the bottom floor. At 2:00 PM in the afternoon a terrible tornado hits the building, totally destroying it. Which family lived?

The White family, because both parents were at work and the kids were in school.


You've exactly displayed what is wrong with this world.
 
Jeebus bravs you are one desperate rightie. This urban legend goes back 40 years and Paul Fray isn't very credible either.

Paul Fray

Fray was the target of the alleged 1974 "(expletive) Jew bastard" comment. As an Associated Press story points out, Fray "can no longer practice law because someone paid him to alter a court document and he surrendered his law license to the Arkansas Supreme Court in 1980. He suffered a cerebral hemorrhage that led to seizures, addiction to prescription pain killers, erratic behavior and memory loss, according to court records. He wrote a letter to Clinton begging her forgiveness for saying things about her 'without factual foundation.'"

NewsMax says nothing about Fray's letter or his disbarment, but briefly mentions his memory problems, buried deep in a story and cited as evidence that "the White House and its media allies" was trying to "discredit" Fray.

Author David Brock says in the July 20 New York Times that he interviewed Fray and his wife in 1995 for his book, "The Seduction of Hillary Rodham," who said nothing then about the alleged slur. Two other authors of Clinton tomes, Gail Sheehy and David Maraniss, report the same thing, according to the New York Daily News. Additionally, Sheehy says that Neill McDonald, another witness to the alleged slur, "told me he didn't hear it," the Daily News reports.

Newsday columnist Marie Cocco points out that Brock recounts in his book why the argument started: Hillary and Fray's wife were protesting a plan by Fray to swing Bill Clinton's unsuccessful 1974 bid for Congress by bribing officials to rig absentee ballots. David Maraniss goes into further detail in his book, "First In His Class."

And the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette quotes Drew Ponder, another former campaign aide, as saying Fray "was dissension personified. ... He has no credibility with me."
The Media Research Center, meanwhile, is offended that Geraldo Rivera dared to question Fray's credibility at all. However, the MRC doesn't bother to print Fray's response to the question, instead referring to the diversionary tactic of comparing Fray to President Clinton.

http://conwebwatch.tripod.com/stories/2000/slur.html


Whats your point ?...that Fray was an asshole ?...and there are about 300 million other people that 'didn't hear the racist slur" either....does that mean it didn't happen ?

Fray , the former campaign director who claimed that the first lady called him a "f---ing Jew b------" passed a lie-detector test arranged by the New York Post.
"I proved it today. I knew I was telling the truth all along. The truth will set you free-and I'm free of this question," Paul Fray told the New York Post after he was informed he had passed the test.




Fray, offered to take a polygraph test to prove he was not lying. Defenders will dismiss the test to defend her, so what. I expect that.
They also reported at the time that the president denied that his wife made the ethnic slur but conceded the first lady may have used the word "bastard."

Who you gonna believe, an admitted perjurer...
 
Last edited:
Whats your point ?...that Fray was an asshole ?...and there are about 300 million other people that 'didn't hear the racist slur" either....does that mean it didn't happen ?

Fray , the former campaign director who claimed that the first lady called him a "f---ing Jew b------" passed a lie-detector test arranged by the New York Post.
"I proved it today. I knew I was telling the truth all along. The truth will set you free-and I'm free of this question," Paul Fray told the New York Post after he was informed he had passed the test.




Fray, offered to take a polygraph test to prove he was not lying. Defenders will dismiss the test to defend her, so what. I expect that.
They also reported at the time that the president denied that his wife made the ethnic slur but conceded the first lady may have used the word "bastard."

Who you gonna believe, an admitted perjurer...

Why did he apologize then?

"Mrs. Clinton released a letter dated July 1, 1997 addressed to her and signed by Fray in which the writer apologized for statements he had made to her and about her over the years.

"At one time in my life, I would say things without thinking, without factual foundation and without rhyme or remedy unless it furthered my own agenda," Fray wrote.
Referring to the 1974 campaign, Fray wrote that he had "conducted myself as a fool." He added, "I beg your forgiveness."

http://edition.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/07/17/hillary.book/index.html
 
The governor was denied service based off if her bigoted political views, there's nothing wrong with that. The gays were denied service merely based on who they were, there us something wrong with that. Common fucking sense.
 
http://eaglerising.com/4959/fascist-gay-lobbys-hypocrisy/

he Fascist Gay Lobby's Hypocrisy

By Onan Coca / 4 March 2014 / 71 Comments
107Share 2 210Share 31Tweet

What will the fascist gay lobby say now?

Governor of New Mexico, Susana Martinez, has been told by her gay hairdresser that he will no longer be working on her coif. It seems that her hairdresser, Mr. Antonio Darden, does not appreciate the Governor’s stance on homosexuality and gay marriage. Because of this he will no longer cut her hair.

Darden told a local news station that he cut the governor’s hair three times, but won’t do it again as long as she continues to oppose gay marriage.

“The governor’s aides called not too long ago, wanting another appointment to come in,” he told KOB-TV. “Because of her stances and her views on this, I told her aides no. They called the next day, asking if I’d changed my mind about taking the governor in and I said no.”


“It’s just equality, dignity for everyone,” he said. “Everybody should be allowed the right to be together.”

govmartinezThat’s interesting.

I think Mr. Darden is well within his rights to refuse service to anyone he chooses – but given the recent spate of lawsuits against Christian business owners for not serving at gay weddings – it seems like the outcry from the liberal community should be immediate. They’ve been the ones saying that Christians’ refusal to perform at gay weddings amounted to a new kind of “Jim Crow” – so wouldn’t this be similar?

The fact is that the gay lobby and the liberal community have overplayed their hand. They have been refusing service (and worse) to conservatives FOR YEARS. Whether the issue has been homosexuality, immigration, abortion, etc. they have always found reasons to marginalize and attack us. Now that Christians have turned the tables and refused to perform at gay weddings, the gay lobby has gotten litigious.

For years (especially in 80’s movies about the beach) we were told “No Shoes, No Shirt, No Service” and we all assumed that businesspeople had the right to refuse service to anyone they didn’t want to serve. In years past we also understood the free market better and knew that for the free market to operate fairly and justly, both parties had to CHOOSE to be part of the transaction.

Forcing business owners to serve everyone no matter what is just as fascist and despotic as the government saying that some people CAN’T be served.

Apparently, liberals are now openly embracing fascism.

Read more at http://eaglerising.com/4959/fascist-gay-lobbys-hypocrisy/#Iol66s4t5P18lAwR.99


So should a business not take my money because I'm black?
 
I think this hairdresser went about it all wrong... he should have let her make an appointment and then just totally fucked up her hairdo and claim he just misunderstood what she had wanted....

much more effective than just whining about it.

Not the same shit-for-brains; the homo is not being forced to work on her hair, whereas, bakers and wedding photographers are being forced to provide their services or get sued.

You're not very bright are you Comrade Commander? But you always bring that special brand of stupid and hypocrite to every thread.
 
The governor was denied service based off if her bigoted political views, there's nothing wrong with that. The gays were denied service merely based on who they were, there us something wrong with that. Common fucking sense.

LMAO; there you have it from the dimwitted left. It's only okay to discriminate if you're a Liberal.

By the way dunce; they weren't being denied because of who they were, they were being denied because of religious beliefs. I'm amused that everyone BUT Christians have a right to believe that they do in this nation these days.
 
I think this hairdresser went about it all wrong... he should have let her make an appointment and then just totally fucked up her hairdo and claim he just misunderstood what she had wanted....

much more effective than just whining about it.

So you are saying you are ok with people being forced to accept homosexuals business, but not homosexuals being forced cut the hair of people who disagree with their lifestyle.
 
What are you saying?

That another God fearing Rightie was so desperate he resorted to citing long ago discredited nonsense from one of the worst partisan hate sites on the net?

It's just so unlike him...NOT!

Another double standard you friggin hypocrite. Your tolerance is showing.
 
This stoner would beat your ass like a rented mule!

Alert, alert, internet tough guy, and I doubt it,
my brothers being 4 and 5 years older than me taught me how to take a punch, they also taught me how to endure pain by threatening to make it worse if I told. So you would basically have to kill me, and that would be if you could have someone take your drug test so you could get in the wring with me. At which point we would see if you could take the beating I would dish out BOY!
 
The governor was denied service based off if her bigoted political views, there's nothing wrong with that. The gays were denied service merely based on who they were, there us something wrong with that. Common fucking sense.

She was denied based on her beliefs,not her bigoted views which is discrimination if the other is. Tolerance goes both ways dunce.
 
Alert, alert, internet tough guy, and I doubt it,
my brothers being 4 and 5 years older than me taught me how to take a punch, they also taught me how to endure pain by threatening to make it worse if I told. So you would basically have to kill me, and that would be if you could have someone take your drug test so you could get in the wring with me. At which point we would see if you could take the beating I would dish out BOY!

wow! you have some seriously bulging e-muscles!
 
Rednecks win wars while hippie dope smokers hide under rocks, it would be no different this time. Find a big rock so you can take your stash with you.

Seriously? Lol, I wonder why a few of my dope smoking hippie friends died over there? Rock must not have been big enough?
 
Back
Top