The punishment for treason under U.S. law is DEATH

[TheDonald]

NOBODY ' owes allegiance ' to the United States. Nobody owes allegiance to Tennessee . Nobody owes allegiance to Hayward County. Nobody owes allegiance to Nutbush. ' Allegiance ' is a tool used by the powerful to control their underlings. Screw the powerful. Respect yourself.

Oh yeah- and screw your ' death penalty '- you primitive mediaeval twat.

You are arguing with the law kid, not me. Just so you know

 

[Rune]

You are arguing with the law kid, not me. Just so you know

Who was convicted of treason puss nuts?

 

[canceled.2021.3]

The raghead muslimes are on a roll lately. Funny everyone says "what is Trump talking about" and the next day the followers of the pedophile mohumud pork chop be upon him kill more innocents

Soon it will be open season on all rag heads and I can't wait. Lots of taxi jobs going to come open soon

 

[moon]

You are arguing with the law kid, not me. Just so you know

Thank you for the information.
Are you aware that the Israeli occupation of Palestine is illegal, that Israel's actions breach the Geneva Conventions and are described as war crimes ? Just so we can establish whether the law can be cherry-picked to suit.

 

[moon]

It is not illegal the Arabs have not abided by UNSC Resolution 242 to end belligerency against Israel, and 242 calls explicitly for withdrawals from territories not all the territories captured in the Arab war of aggression. The GC does not apply to the disputed territories because the PA is not a high contracting party thereof.

So you're back on your pro-fascist unicycle with a megaphone. Let's strip your lies away and decide what to do with the fascist underneath.

International law and Israeli settlements

The international community considers the establishment of Israeli settlements in the Israeli-occupied territories illegal under international law.[1][2][3][4][5] Israel maintains that they are consistent with international law[6] because it does not agree that the Fourth Geneva Convention applies to the territories occupied in the 1967 Six-Day War.[7] The United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice and the High Contracting Parties to the Convention have all affirmed that the Fourth Geneva Convention does apply.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law_and_Israeli_settlements

I'd call most people ' misinformed ' when they post crap like you do- but you've posted it before and been corrected before. That makes you a lying troll. Don't quit though because lying trolls provide the opportunities for establishing the truth about the brutal , ethnic cleansing doctrine of Zionism. Thank you for the coming bump.

 

[Face Your]

So you're back on your pro-fascist unicycle with a megaphone. Let's strip your lies away and decide what to do with the fascist underneath.



I'd call most people ' misinformed ' when they post crap like you do- but you've posted it before and been corrected before. That makes you a lying troll. Don't quit though because lying trolls provide the opportunities for establishing the truth about the brutal , ethnic cleansing doctrine of Zionism. Thank you for the coming bump.

The language of the GC is plain as day it only applies to the territory of high contracting member states.

If the territory was not in dispute and not recognized as such then explain the calls in the Oslo Accords to solve the disputes?

Interesting ethnic cleansing that sees the Arab Nazi invaders population grow exponentially in both the disputed territories and Israel proper.

 

[moon]

The language of the GC is plain as day it only applies to the territory of high contracting member states.

If the territory was not in dispute and not recognized as such then explain the calls in the Oslo Accords to solve the disputes?

Interesting ethnic cleansing that sees the Arab Nazi invaders population grow exponentially in both the disputed territories and Israel proper.

Even trolls, I suppose, are entitled to continue babbling on their way to the rubber room. Free speech is sacrosanct in civilized societies. Not so in Israel, however, where you can be jailed for speaking and writing poetry. Liberal democratic values ? It's fascism, stupid.
Still, your lies do require addressing for a third time this evening- so here we go;

International law and Israeli settlements

The international community considers the establishment of Israeli settlements in the Israeli-occupied territories illegal under international law.[1][2][3][4][5] Israel maintains that they are consistent with international law[6] because it does not agree that the Fourth Geneva Convention applies to the territories occupied in the 1967 Six-Day War.[7] The United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice and the High Contracting Parties to the Convention have all affirmed that the Fourth Geneva Convention does apply.[8][9]

Still fancy chancing your arm with your ignorant, fascist bollox ?

 

[Face Your]

Even trolls, I suppose, are entitled to continue babbling on their way to the rubber room. Free speech is sacrosanct in civilized societies. Not so in Israel, however, where you can be jailed for speaking and writing poetry. Liberal democratic values ? It's fascism, stupid.
Still, your lies do require addressing for a third time this evening- so here we go;



Still fancy chancing your arm with your ignorant, fascist bollox ?

Shut your cock hole you pedophile worshipper.


APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION
ARTICLE 2

In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in peacetime, the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them.
The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance.
Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the present Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound by the Convention in relation to the said Power, if the latter accepts and applies the provisions thereof.

https://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl...t&documentId=41229BA1D6F7E573C12563CD00519E4A

The PA is not a high contracting party, thanks for playing fuck tard.

 

[moon]

OK- knock out coming up.
It's plain that your only hope of staying in the ring is to repeatedly parrot the text of documents which you clearly don't understand.

What we have to do is to determine whether to accept the spurious opinion of a previously-disgraced Internet troll - that's you- or to accept the deliberated conclusions of international lawyers, the United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice and the High Contracting Parties to the Convention - who have all affirmed that the Fourth Geneva Convention does apply.

Tough choice, eh ?

Once more;

International law and Israeli settlements

The international community considers the establishment of Israeli settlements in the Israeli-occupied territories illegal under international law.[1][2][3][4][5] Israel maintains that they are consistent with international law[6] because it does not agree that the Fourth Geneva Convention applies to the territories occupied in the 1967 Six-Day War.[7] The United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice and the High Contracting Parties to the Convention have all affirmed that the Fourth Geneva Convention does apply.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law_and_Israeli_settlements

Now, please come back as a zombie and give everybody a laugh.

 

[Face Your]

OK- knock out coming up.
It's plain that your only hope of staying in the ring is to repeatedly parrot the text of documents which you clearly don't understand.

What we have to do is to determine whether to accept the spurious opinion of a previously-disgraced Internet troll - that's you- or to accept the deliberated conclusions of international lawyers, the United Nations Security Council, the United Nations General Assembly, the International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice and the High Contracting Parties to the Convention - who have all affirmed that the Fourth Geneva Convention does apply.

Tough choice, eh ?

Once more;




Now, please come back as a zombie and give everybody a laugh.

Plain English fuck tard:


APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION
ARTICLE 2

In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in peacetime, the present Convention shall apply to all cases of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties, even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them.
The Convention shall also apply to all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance.
Although one of the Powers in conflict may not be a party to the present Convention, the Powers who are parties thereto shall remain bound by it in their mutual relations. They shall furthermore be bound by the Convention in relation to the said Power, if the latter accepts and applies the provisions thereof.

https://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl...t&documentId=41229BA1D6F7E573C12563CD00519E4A

So are you suggesting that the PA is a high contracting party to the GC?

 

[moon]

.....

 

[CFM]

Thank you for the information.
Are you aware that the Israeli occupation of Palestine is illegal, that Israel's actions breach the Geneva Conventions and are described as war crimes ? Just so we can establish whether the law can be cherry-picked to suit.

Stay on topic. Are you able to do that.

No one gives a shit about a bunch of sub human Palestinians.

 

[moon]

Stay on topic. Are you able to do that.

The ' topic ' concerns whoever I'm addressing at the time- and it ain't you.

No one gives a shit about a bunch of sub human Palestinians.

This earns you a 1- 10 rating of zero on the truth chart. Think about what you've said. Consider the context. Look in a mirror.

 

[Canceled.2018.1]

Are you guys attempting to discuss treason or are you having some sort of penis competition? Shows how well you have mastered the art of conversation and puts you on the same level for sure.

 

[moon]

Are you guys attempting to discuss treason or are you having some sort of penis competition?

What's the difference ? Post #2 lays it out very clearly for you if you simply read it.

 

[CFM]

The ' topic ' concerns whoever I'm addressing at the time- and it ain't you.




This earns you a 1- 10 rating of zero on the truth chart. Think about what you've said. Consider the context. Look in a mirror.

The topic concern the punishment for treason in the U.S.

I did look. I didn't see a sub human Palestinian waste of flesh and oxygen like you see when you look.

How does it feel knowing the only way your kind gets attention is to kill innocent people. That should tell you what you are and what you believe don't matter for anything. You're a faulty people living a faulty existence.

 

[moon]

The topic concern the punishment for treason in the U.S.

I did look. I didn't see a sub human Palestinian waste of flesh and oxygen like you see when you look.

How does it feel knowing the only way your kind gets attention is to kill innocent people. That should tell you what you are and what you believe don't matter for anything. You're a faulty people living a faulty existence.

Fallacious trolling.
You're the troll who claims that Palestine has no support.
Tell the forum the result of the UN vote to recognize the State of Palestine.
Then repeat your stupid statement.
Twat.

 

[CFM]

What's the difference ? Post #2 lays it out very clearly for you if you simply read it.

Post #2 is your faulty opinion that you think people should believe because you said it.

 

[CFM]

Fallacious trolling.
You're the troll who claims that Palestine has no support.
Tell the forum the result of the UN vote to recognize the State of Palestine.
Then repeat your stupid statement.
Twat.

Does that make the UN responsible for Palestinian terrorist activities?

 

[moon]

Post #2 is your faulty opinion that you think people should believe because you said it.

Law is applied opinion, numbnuts.