The "progressives" black problem in San Francisco

honestly i dont think it has to do with race but rather rich vs poor. The progressives with their self urinating paint and anti homeless laws dont really want the poor people anywhere near them.
 
Short op-Ed in the San Francisco Examiner about how the progressive board members don't represent the needs of the remaining few black people in San Francisco.


http://www.sfexaminer.com/progressives-black-problem/

The democrat party has taken the black vote for granted for years. To be fair the GOP has taken conservatives vote for granted for years as well.

I think this election is going to turn political conventional wisdom on its head. The signs are there but people refuse to see.

Trump will get over 10% of the black vote in some places
 
Blacks will always vote 90%+ for the welfare party. Even blacks who have jobs and work hard will vote welfare because they have relatives that access the welfare system and they don't want uncle joe to show up on their doorstep asking for "a little help".
 
more corporate whores to be replaced by the non bought


you can have when they are voted out
 
The police reform measure, which ultimately survived as Proposition G on November’s ballot, was sure to win at the polls. But in an act of pure political retaliation against Supervisor Cohen, the progressives voted to kill it and roll its provisions into their Public Advocate measure, which was far less likely to pass. They jeopardized important police reforms for their petty political vendetta.


vendetta




bullshit
 
they have been much more likely massaged by money


we can replace them thanks to democracy


lots of real liberals to replace them with
 
tell me why they really voted this way

I often have no clue why the politicians in my city vote as they do.

As for calling these people corporate whores these are politicians who support making SF a sanctuary city, giving illegals a right to vote in school board elections, lowering the voting age to 16 and not building new housing in the name of keeping housing "affordable".

If those are corporate whore positions then who in America is not a corporate whore?
 
I often have no clue why the politicians in my city vote as they do.

As for calling these people corporate whores these are politicians who support making SF a sanctuary city, giving illegals a right to vote in school board elections, lowering the voting age to 16 and not building new housing in the name of keeping housing "affordable".

If those are corporate whore positions then who in America is not a corporate whore?

with the R party in death throws guess who the wealthy will now buy shitty daddyman
 
This is among the many articles I've posted Zap that you didn't respond to. This happens because you don't respond.
 
Back
Top