The problem with Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson

[T. A. Gardner]

Did you read it you shitty racist?

Unlike you, yes I did.

 

[Bourbon]

You can Start calling her Judge ...

 

[Nomad]

Isn't her rulings on sex offender cases particularly, but rather her being selected in much the same way as Barack Obama was. That is, on the basis of political orientation and skin color.

And what was the basis for Barrett's selection, genius?

Obama had virtually no experience in politics outside of being elected. His previous office experience consisted of one term in the Senate doing nothing, and several in the Illinois senate doing nothing. He had no real work history having been an obscure "community organizer" whose project participation could be characterized as a failure. His stint as a lecturer at the University of Chicago could likewise be characterized as disinterested mediocrity.

Trump was a NYC real estate shyster con artist turned TV game show host!!!!

Jackson is much the same. She has the correct political and ethnic composition to appeal to those wanting her appointed.

Jackson is much the same as Obama in that she's black and has an African name.

The two worst things in the world to your kind of redneck.

She and Obama are also both highly intelligent legal scholars.

Something your kind of redneck places last, below gender, ethnicity and political ideology.

Outside of that, her experience on the bench is rather thin. On the few cases where she's ruled on issues that could be considered commensurate with Supreme Court cases, she has a solid track record of being overturned. This is a good indication that she has a poor legal mind for making considered and sound judgements in rulings and resorts instead to political expediency.

More bullshit.

That's the problem with Jackson becoming a Justice. She would be a politician first, and a jurist second. The Left would love that, while the rest-of-us would, and should be appalled.

Pure unadulterated partisan hypocrite garbage.

You have zero idea what you're gabbing about.

 

[Truth Detector]

Isn't her rulings on sex offender cases particularly, but rather her being selected in much the same way as Barack Obama was. That is, on the basis of political orientation and skin color.

Obama had virtually no experience in politics outside of being elected. His previous office experience consisted of one term in the Senate doing nothing, and several in the Illinois senate doing nothing. He had no real work history having been an obscure "community organizer" whose project participation could be characterized as a failure. His stint as a lecturer at the University of Chicago could likewise be characterized as disinterested mediocrity.

Jackson is much the same. She has the correct political and ethnic composition to appeal to those wanting her appointed. Outside of that, her experience on the bench is rather thin. On the few cases where she's ruled on issues that could be considered commensurate with Supreme Court cases, she has a solid track record of being overturned. This is a good indication that she has a poor legal mind for making considered and sound judgements in rulings and resorts instead to political expediency.

That's the problem with Jackson becoming a Justice. She would be a politician first, and a jurist second. The Left would love that, while the rest-of-us would, and should be appalled.

Given what I have heard from her, I find her very qualified assuming she is not gaslighting us. Her time as a public defender doesn't matter in her judicial decisions.

I would vote FOR her confirmation as being qualified.

 

[Truth Detector]

She is supremely qualified for SCOTUS.

So was Clarence Thomas. So was Niel Gorsuch. So was Amy Coney Barrett. So was Robert Bork. How were they treated by the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses?

 

[Truth Detector]

Watching Durbin and the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses demand civility after what they have done to past Republican nominees is not mere hypocrisy, it's repugnant in it's dishonesty.

 

[dukkha]

Isn't her rulings on sex offender cases particularly,

yes it is.. she';s a flak for Prog noise

 

[Bourbon]

Typically when the Right is against a point of view, they will ask you for proof and documentation, knowing that no matter how much Poof or Documentation or Time you waist, they’ll never see any point of view than their own.

I say, just tell them to go Fuck Themselves, she’s going to be a Supreme Court Judge, get the fuck over it

 

[Truth Detector]

Typically when the Right is against a point of view, they will ask you for proof and documentation, knowing that no matter how much Poof or Documentation or Time you waist, they’ll never see any point of view than their own.

I say, just tell them to go Fuck Themselves

This is a perfect example of projection. It's when leftists accuse Republicans of doing what they do every damned day.

Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.

 

[Bourbon]

This is a perfect example of projection. It's when leftists accuse Republicans of doing what they do every damned day.

Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.

I thought I told you to go Fuck Yourself ...

 

[BidenPresident]

Isn't her rulings on sex offender cases particularly, but rather her being selected in much the same way as Barack Obama was. That is, on the basis of political orientation and skin color.

Obama had virtually no experience in politics outside of being elected. His previous office experience consisted of one term in the Senate doing nothing, and several in the Illinois senate doing nothing. He had no real work history having been an obscure "community organizer" whose project participation could be characterized as a failure. His stint as a lecturer at the University of Chicago could likewise be characterized as disinterested mediocrity.

Jackson is much the same. She has the correct political and ethnic composition to appeal to those wanting her appointed. Outside of that, her experience on the bench is rather thin. On the few cases where she's ruled on issues that could be considered commensurate with Supreme Court cases, she has a solid track record of being overturned. This is a good indication that she has a poor legal mind for making considered and sound judgements in rulings and resorts instead to political expediency.

That's the problem with Jackson becoming a Justice. She would be a politician first, and a jurist second. The Left would love that, while the rest-of-us would, and should be appalled.

The problem you have is she is Black.

 

[Bourbon]

The problem you have is she is Black.

Well he’s going to have a problem for a long time, because she’ll be a SCOUT and Black for a Long Time

 

[reagansghost]

The problem with Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson

don't tell me, her middle name?

 

[saltydancin]

What a mail-in critique this is.

She is supremely qualified for SCOTUS.

While Jackson is only reciting what her supreme swastika up Uranus kangaroo court Christian Nation diatribe predecessors has been for decades of "equal justice under law" federal perjury where Mengele "Angel of Death" traditions of McHeil's Navy thieving US Constitution arsonists practices are little more than a patriot act of Christiananality pedophilia in lieu of medical care.

 

[reagansghost]

While Jackson is only reciting what her supreme swastika up Uranus kangaroo court Christian Nation diatribe predecessors has been for decades of "equal justice under law" federal perjury where Mengele "Angel of Death" traditions of McHeil's Navy thieving US Constitution arsonists practices are little more than a patriot act of Christiananality pedophilia in lieu of medical care.

couldn't have said it better

 

[T. A. Gardner]

The problem you have is she is Black.

Bullshit. Not once have I mentioned her race. That's irrelevant. It's her politics and how they influence decision making that's the issue. I will say it appears she's less of a radical Leftist squirrel than Sotomeyer is.

 

[BidenPresident]

Bullshit. Not once have I mentioned her race. That's irrelevant. It's her politics and how they influence decision making that's the issue. I will say it appears she's less of a radical Leftist squirrel than Sotomeyer is.

Indeed.

 

[BartenderElite]

Bullshit. Not once have I mentioned her race. That's irrelevant. It's her politics and how they influence decision making that's the issue. I will say it appears she's less of a radical Leftist squirrel than Sotomeyer is.

I certainly don't have an issue if people have a problem w/ her ideology - that's always been fair game for criticism, though actual appointment to the court should be mainly on qualifications. Elections have consequences & all that.

But the OP is just wrong. Her qualifications for the court are pretty unassailable.

 

[Legion]

I certainly don't have an issue if people have a problem w/ her ideology - that's always been fair game for criticism, though actual appointment to the court should be mainly on qualifications. Elections have consequences & all that. But the OP is just wrong. Her qualifications for the court are pretty unassailable.

So you say.

 

[Legion]

Got a scintilla of proof of that?

Of course not.

Affirmative Action Jackson – up for confirmation to our nation’s highest court – has an alarming pattern of going soft on child pornography offenders.

As early as law school, Affirmative Action Jackson was complaining of the "current climate of fear, hatred, and revenge associated with the release of convicted sex offenders."

While serving on the Sentencing Commission, Affirmative Action Jackson supported eliminating the existing child pornography mandatory-minimum sentence.

Those views carried over to Affirmative Action Jackson’s brief time on the bench.

Over and over again, Affirmative Action Jackson handed down sentences well below the congressionally-endorsed Sentencing Guidelines recommendations.

In one of the most egregious cases (United States v. Hawkins), involving an adult man who uploaded videos of underage children engaging in sexual behavior to YouTube, Affirmative Action Jackson sentenced the offender to just three months in prison, even though the Sentencing Guidelines recommended an 8- to 10-year sentence.

Unfortunately, Affirmative Action Jackson is not the first leftist to favor child molestation.

The responses from disgusting DEMOCRATS and their sick sycophants in the progressive propaganda press have been very illuminating.

They seem to be coalescing around a disturbing line of response: everybody does it.

That is to say, Affirmative Action Jackson’s record of leniency doesn’t really matter, because other leftist judges repeatedly deviate from the guidelines in child pornography cases, and Soros-backed prosecutors and perverted probation officers steeped in progressive ideology often request below-guidelines sentences, and a chorus of left-wing law professors, criminologists and psychologists all believe that we’re too tough on child sex offenders.









https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/supreme-court-nominee-judge-jacksons-crime-sentences-sen-josh-hawley