"The only card hillary has is the women's card". Was this proven right?

tsuke

New member
Disclaimer: My main source of liberal news is TYT and secular talk. It seems the liberal commentators I listen to who are doing a post mortem agree that she had no message besides im a woman vote for me.
 
Disclaimer: My main source of liberal news is TYT and secular talk. It seems the liberal commentators I listen to who are doing a post mortem agree that she had no message besides im a woman vote for me.
all she had was anti-Trump hysteria
 
Disclaimer: My main source of liberal news is TYT and secular talk. It seems the liberal commentators I listen to who are doing a post mortem agree that she had no message besides im a woman vote for me.

And in the end, college educated white women voted for Trump.....that gotta hurt....

She didn't just lose, she was humiliated.....
 
She was not humiliated, silly. You don't get humiliated when you win the popular vote. She lost the election that is not the same as being humiliated.

in FACT I would say losing the popular vote to as bad a candidate as HRC was humiliating to DT.
 
She was not humiliated, silly. You don't get humiliated when you win the popular vote. She lost the election that is not the same as being humiliated.

in FACT I would say losing the popular vote to as bad a candidate as HRC was humiliating to DT.

Take your 'popular' vote and ride off into the sunset, counselor....its the very reason the founding fathers saw fit to form a democratic republic and make certain the minority doesn't get trampled on by 'mob rule' that the left is so fond of.....
 
Take your 'popular' vote and ride off into the sunset, counselor....its the very reason the founding fathers saw fit to form a democratic republic and make certain the minority doesn't get trampled on by 'mob rule' that the left is so fond of.....

He isn't saying that Trump shouldn't be President because of it.

Just that Hillary was hardly "humiliated." She got the votes of more Americans - many more. Deal w/ it.
 
Disclaimer: My main source of liberal news is TYT and secular talk. It seems the liberal commentators I listen to who are doing a post mortem agree that she had no message besides im a woman vote for me.

1) all she did was attack trump. She did not give people a reason to vote FOR her, only against trump. This clearly did not help to turn out the vote.

2) her slogan "I'm with her" is retarded. What does that even mean? What does that say about our country? You are with the chick? People can say what they want, but "Make America Great Again" is a great slogan, it's an actual message that resonates, you can acronym it to MAGA, etc. Again, this is proof hillary lacked a broad message.

So yes I would basically agree with you. She did not effectively sum up her campaign or succinctly advertise to the american people what she was about.
 
She was not humiliated, silly. You don't get humiliated when you win the popular vote. She lost the election that is not the same as being humiliated.

in FACT I would say losing the popular vote to as bad a candidate as HRC was humiliating to DT.

lol no... clinton mainly ran up her vote in states like california. No one cares about california. Trump won where it counts.
 
Take away the 3 million illegals who voted and then what ? She lost when it was impossible to lose... twice

First democrats rejected her then the country did.

She's a loser
 
This is not a card game asshole.
It is selecting a world leader...

You selected an egotistical self serving huckster moron who will never understand public service...
Most Americans had better sense...


...but the December surprise will correct all that...
 
my father was just minding his own business talking to one of his employees when Mr. Trump vicously attacked him and beat him within an inch of his life. Not content with that he also curropted one of my fathers african american employees and got him to help shave my fathers head. Trump is a monster. - S.M.
 
my father was just minding his own business talking to one of his employees when Mr. Trump vicously attacked him and beat him within an inch of his life. Not content with that he also curropted one of my fathers african american employees and got him to help shave my fathers head. Trump is a monster. - S.M.

Statesman?
 
And in the end, college educated white women voted for Trump.....that gotta hurt....

She didn't just lose, she was humiliated.....

And trump's own birth city and state didn't vote for him, now that's gotta hurt.

Btw bravs, did you know three trump apartment buildings are removing the trump name from the exteriors after residents started a “Dump the Trump” petition?
 
Take away the 3 million illegals who voted and then what ? She lost when it was impossible to lose... twice

First democrats rejected her then the country did.

She's a loser

What 3 million illegals? Fact checking sites are working overtime debunking these dumb rumors.

On 14 November 2016 — not even a week after the results of the 2016 presidential election were announced — our inbox exploded with messages requesting that we investigate the claim that more than three million votes were cast by "illegal immigrants" or "illegal aliens" (non-citizens). In some cases it was also claimed that these three million voters are "under investigation" for fraud, or that three million votes for Hillary Clinton will be "voided" because they were illegal. The first thing we found was that while no such claim has been reported in the mainstream media, it has been repeated on scores of partisan, right-leaning web sites since the 8 November election under the guise of "news."

We scoured at least a dozen such articles for evidence to support the claim, but found none. All of them pointed back to the same source: a pair of tweets by someone named Gregg Phillips, whose Twitter profile identifies him as the founder of VoteStand ("America's first online fraud reporting app").

Phillips offers no evidence whatsoever to back up the claim that he "verified" more than three million non-citizen votes. Nor does he divulge his data sources or methodology, much less explain how it was possible to "verify" three million fraudulent votes within five days of a national election.
 
What 3 million illegals? Fact checking sites are working overtime debunking these dumb rumors.

On 14 November 2016 — not even a week after the results of the 2016 presidential election were announced — our inbox exploded with messages requesting that we investigate the claim that more than three million votes were cast by "illegal immigrants" or "illegal aliens" (non-citizens). In some cases it was also claimed that these three million voters are "under investigation" for fraud, or that three million votes for Hillary Clinton will be "voided" because they were illegal. The first thing we found was that while no such claim has been reported in the mainstream media, it has been repeated on scores of partisan, right-leaning web sites since the 8 November election under the guise of "news."

We scoured at least a dozen such articles for evidence to support the claim, but found none. All of them pointed back to the same source: a pair of tweets by someone named Gregg Phillips, whose Twitter profile identifies him as the founder of VoteStand ("America's first online fraud reporting app").

Phillips offers no evidence whatsoever to back up the claim that he "verified" more than three million non-citizen votes. Nor does he divulge his data sources or methodology, much less explain how it was possible to "verify" three million fraudulent votes within five days of a national election.

Just goes to show that some unverified claims you'll believe and some unverified claims you won't, huh'..lol
 
1) all she did was attack trump. She did not give people a reason to vote FOR her, only against trump. This clearly did not help to turn out the vote.

2) her slogan "I'm with her" is retarded. What does that even mean? What does that say about our country? You are with the chick? People can say what they want, but "Make America Great Again" is a great slogan, it's an actual message that resonates, you can acronym it to MAGA, etc. Again, this is proof hillary lacked a broad message.

So yes I would basically agree with you. She did not effectively sum up her campaign or succinctly advertise to the american people what she was about.

Make America Grind again
 
Electorally speaking, 232-306 is hardly an embarrassment. When you get destroyed the way Mondale, McGovern, and Goldwater did - that's an embarrassment.
 
Back
Top