The one question on Iran no leftist can answer. Why 60%

They only need 20% u235 in the production of technetium

Concerns regarding nuclear proliferation have led to a shift towards low-enriched uranium (LEU) targets, with less than 20% U-235 content.
The fact that they do not have nukes tells you they are not after them. You should understand that. Trumpys claim they have refined far beyond medical uses. If so, they should have a pile of nukes. They do not.
 
Bombing Iran which has not attacked them, is defense?
Iran has hit Israel with missiles and drones on April 13th 2024 and has also used proxies to attack Israel. Iran also helped plan the October attack on Israel. So your saying Iran had not attacked Israel is absurd. :laugh: (170 drones, 30 cruise missiles, and 120 ballistic missiles)
 
You really think alot of yourself don't you? I have been posting about this long before yesterday. But, I don't want to compromise your delusions
You are in a constant state of backtracking and retreat.

First you erroneously assumed that 60 percent uranium enrichment was weapons grade (it's not).

Then you howled that there's no legitimate purpose to have enriched uranium, other than military applications - when the fact is there are important civilian applications:
According to the National Institute of Health, highly enriched uranium is needed to produce the isotope Molybdenum-99, which is used in most diagnostic medical isotope procedures.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215133/
 
The fact that they do not have nukes tells you they are not after them. You should understand that. Trumpys claim they have refined far beyond medical uses. If so, they should have a pile of nukes. They do not.
They currently have / had 400KG of 60 U 235. Enough to build 9-10 nukes if they enrich to 90% which can be done in 1-2 months. I suspect they were collecting enough material to build more than one bomb at a time. Regardless it would be retarded to allow them to reach 90% in 1-2 months from now.
 
You are in a constant state of backtracking and retreat.

First you erroneously assumed that 60 percent uranium enrichment was weapons grade (it's not).

Then you howled that there's no legitimate purpose to have enriched uranium, other than military applications - when the fact is there are important civilian applications:
They only need small amounts of 20% u-235. They CERTAINLY do not need 400 plus KG of 60% which can be enriched to 90% in 1-2 months.
 
The fact that they do not have nukes tells you they are not after them. You should understand that. Trumpys claim they have refined far beyond medical uses. If so, they should have a pile of nukes. They do not.
Wrong. It tells you that they have issues that are unresolved to producing one and living afterwards. My bet is they want 6 to 10 working bombs before they announce they have them. That way they have sufficient to retaliate if someone tries to take them away.
 
According to the National Institute of Health, highly enriched uranium is needed to produce the isotope Molybdenum-99, which is used in most diagnostic medical isotope procedures.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK215133/
So? Its primary use is in SPECT scanners. How many of those does Iran have? Judging from this source, the number is ZERO!


So, they--Iran--has no fucking need for medical Mo 99.
 
Wrong. It tells you that they have issues that are unresolved to producing one and living afterwards. My bet is they want 6 to 10 working bombs before they announce they have them. That way they have sufficient to retaliate if someone tries to take them away.
That is exactly what I think.
 
Why was Iran enriching uranium to 60%?
Because trump cancelled the deal limiting their ability to enrich uranium with the promise of a better deal coming immediately, but no better deal came.

Why did trump decide to allow the Iranians to enrich uranium to 60%?
 
Wrong. It tells you that they have issues that are unresolved to producing one and living afterwards. My bet is they want 6 to 10 working bombs before they announce they have them. That way they have sufficient to retaliate if someone tries to take them away.
Wrong. They have had the scientists build many centrifuges and have been working with nuclear energy in medicine. They had the knowledge but not the desire. Afghanistan and Pakistan got nukes. They are not hard to get. You are making shit up again.
Here are many esteemed scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_contemporary_Iranian_scientists,_scholars,_and_engineers
 
Wrong. They have had the scientists build many centrifuges and have been working with nuclear energy in medicine. They had the knowledge but not the desire. Afghanistan and Pakistan got nukes. They are not hard to get. You are making shit up again.
Here are many esteemed scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_contemporary_Iranian_scientists,_scholars,_and_engineers
Something like 90% of the people listed in your shitty, basic, link aren't working in or for Iran.
 
You are in a constant state of backtracking and retreat.

First you erroneously assumed that 60 percent uranium enrichment was weapons grade (it's not).

Then you howled that there's no legitimate purpose to have enriched uranium, other than military applications - when the fact is there are important civilian applications:
You are a lar.
 
Not one leftist on this board can answer one simple question. Why was Iran enriching uranium to 60%? They squawk and squawk that they weren't at the magical 90% enrichment phase, but they can not or will not explain why they were even at 60%

It is not even disputed that they were at 60%. The UN confirmed it.

It is also irrefutable that if one is using uranium for peaceful energy production purposes one does not need to enrich uranium past 5%. I have read some places maybe up to 20% (but I am no expert)

I have yet to come across any source that can justify enriching uranium to 60% for peaceful reasons. The only reason to enrich to 60% is because it is that much easier to enrich it to 90%.

So until a board leftist can answer this one question reasonably, I will not even take them seriously on this issue. Case closed.

Why would "leftists" question that more than anyone else? You're one more dunce with leftists on the brain.
 
Wrong. They have had the scientists build many centrifuges and have been working with nuclear energy in medicine. They had the knowledge but not the desire. Afghanistan and Pakistan got nukes. They are not hard to get. You are making shit up again.
Here are many esteemed scientists. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_contemporary_Iranian_scientists,_scholars,_and_engineers
No, Afghanistan does not have nuclear weapons, nor has it ever been a nuclear state. It is hard to take you seriously when you make such a stupid mistake.
 
Back
Top