The Obit Ted Kennedy Deserves

i never said all.....

onceler...how is it not hypocrisy? how are the conservatives being hypocritical? it is clear that it is ok to repeatedly talk about his good deeds, but it is bad to repeatedly talk about his bad deeds......that is hypocrisy

Yurt, I'm an addict to these boards so I see a lot of what gets posted. Most of what we have talked about regarding Kennedy has been about Mary Jo. Outside of Jarod saying Kennedy's his hero and Desh (who while good people is so in love with Democrats you have to write off most of what she says) no one has really said anything all that outrageous about Kennedy. Hell I even started a thread asking about his legislative achievements and it got very little response.

I'm just throwing out my two cents. I understand where you are coming from but this time I think you are seeing something that isn't there.
 
again the hypocrisy......

so apparently when someone kills someone....we can only mention their supposed good deeds until a few days.....after their death....

:rolleyes:

That's right...at least it used to be, back when civility and not hatred and anger ruled the day.

That you couldn't contain your hatred of the man for a couple of days speaks volumes.
 
How would you have treated one of Obamas girls being pregnant out of wedlock during the campaign?

not the way you pukes would..you all are the champions of woman, then turn around and shit all over a girl who makes mistake and decides to keep her baby...I guess if she would of aborted it, she would of been a hero to you lowlifes..
 
this is the example of the hypocrisy i am talking about.....first time i posted mary jo's picture.....the very first reply was:

When Bush dies, are you going to post photos of the 300,000+ people that he killed?

why was this necessary onceler? you're basically saying how dare i post a picture of mary jo....when bush supposedly killed 300,000+ people....
 
That's right...at least it used to be, back when civility and not hatred and anger ruled the day.

That you couldn't contain your hatred of the man for a couple of days speaks volumes.

:rolleyes:

wow....talking about mary jo means i hate him....wow

amazing how vicious some libs are in defending kennedy
 
this is the example of the hypocrisy i am talking about.....first time i posted mary jo's picture.....the very first reply was:



why was this necessary onceler? you're basically saying how dare i post a picture of mary jo....when bush supposedly killed 300,000+ people....

we better start keeping track of how many people the Hugo Obama is killing so we post it later. since no lefties will do it.
 
Yurt, I'm an addict to these boards so I see a lot of what gets posted. Most of what we have talked about regarding Kennedy has been about Mary Jo. Outside of Jarod saying Kennedy's his hero and Desh (who while good people is so in love with Democrats you have to write off most of what she says) no one has really said anything all that outrageous about Kennedy. Hell I even started a thread asking about his legislative achievements and it got very little response.

I'm just throwing out my two cents. I understand where you are coming from but this time I think you are seeing something that isn't there.

Now really think about what you just said and then reflect on how many times I have been derided on here by even dems and then turned out to be right.

I was given shit for saying the elections were tampered with and there is massive evidence that our election system was completely insecure.

I was derided for going on about WP in Fallughia and guess how that ended?

WMDs in Iraq

AQ ties

A justice system that was politcized

Cheneys invovlment in torture

The list goes on and on.

You were on the wrong side of the arguement and I turned out to be right.


Your memory is pretty sad dude
 
this is the example of the hypocrisy i am talking about.....first time i posted mary jo's picture.....the very first reply was:



why was this necessary onceler? you're basically saying how dare i post a picture of mary jo....when bush supposedly killed 300,000+ people....

That isn't hypocrisy.

I was taking issue with your shameless appeal to emotionalism; little did I know that would be the 1st of many times you would post her picture.

For the record, I took BAC to task for the same thing, when he posted pictures of victims from the Iraq war, even though we agreed about that war in general.

Cawacko is no leftie, and he recognizes the same thing I do: you have had tunnel vision about Kennedy & Chappaquidick. Very few lefties have not agreed that his behavior was deplorable in that situation, and it has been discussed on this board ad nauseum.

But it's not enough for you; we have to reject AND condemn, and then when that is over, we have to condemn others who dare to talk about anything else in Kennedy's legacy, and condemn again.

You're a real piece of work.
 
lol.....your first stance was that i was wrong because it is obsessive, eg. repeated.....yet i find the first time i post the pic and lo and behold you automatically jump at me for some double standard policing....you just destroyed your own argument
 
this is the example of the hypocrisy i am talking about.....first time i posted mary jo's picture.....the very first reply was:



why was this necessary onceler? you're basically saying how dare i post a picture of mary jo....when bush supposedly killed 300,000+ people....

I am happy you posted the picture. It should remind us all of the very beautiful young woman who shouldn't have had to die in the hands of a drunk.
 
and actually...if you scroll down that thread.....several libs posted laura bush posts....yet i'm the obsessive one...

that was the first time i posted that pic and the libs went on the defensive and had to bring up laura as if that makes mary jo go away.....

your argument fails onceler
 
lol.....your first stance was that i was wrong because it is obsessive, eg. repeated.....yet i find the first time i post the pic and lo and behold you automatically jump at me for some double standard policing....you just destroyed your own argument

No, I didn't. You're just attempting your cyclical arguing again.

My first criticism was your appeal to emotionalism; then, I realized how crazy obsessed with this you are.

And you are; even posters that lean more right notice it. How can you deny that? You have posted her picture everywhere on this board, and continually bring her up in any conversation about Kennedy, as though nothing else is worth discussing.

And I'm not saying that Chappaquiddick isn't part of his legacy. But I think you'd be hard-pressed to argue that it hasn't been thoroughly covered on this board, by both right & left (you're assertion before that the left hasn't talked about it is ridiculous).
 
little Chelsea is now a ADULT...look how you all have treated Sarah Palin and her children...

Fringe righties made fun of Chelsea and Amy Carter when they were children and adults, and Hillary has been raked over the coals since Bill's first campaign in the early '90's.

The kids don't deserve that kind of treatment. It shows the mean streak of righties like rush, who never had kids, thank God, and McCain, who should have known better but gets no award for being Father of the Year.
 
and actually...if you scroll down that thread.....several libs posted laura bush posts....yet i'm the obsessive one...

that was the first time i posted that pic and the libs went on the defensive and had to bring up laura as if that makes mary jo go away.....

your argument fails onceler

Are they posting picture's of the victim in that accident on as many threads as they can?
 
Back
Top