The numbers don't add up

C

canceled.2021.1

#AMERICAISDEAD
So there is a big kerfuffle in Texas. The baby killing crowd has their collective knickers in a twist over a bill that would make it illegal to kill a baby at 20 weeks vs 29 weeks. They are trying to portray it as some huge affront to women.

Most notably they pro baby killing crowd claims that if passed, would lead to 37 of the 42 baby killing mills in Texas being forced to close.

Now this seems odd because according to the baby killing crowd, Planned Parenthood only derives 3% of its revenues from killing babies. According to the Guttmacher Institute, only 1.5% of baby killings happen after the 20th week. This means that only 0.045% of Planned Parenthoods business comes from killing babies after the 20th week.

This begs the question. How is it possible that a business would have to close after only losing 0.045% of its revenues? That makes no sense does it? Does it?

http://www.americanthinker.com/2013...gely_hysterical_over_0045_of_its_revenue.html


Here is another little tidbit for you to chew on. The pro baby killing crowd love to say "we want abortion, rare, safe and legal". Well, if they want it SAFE, then they would support the Texas bill and here is why

The risk of death associated with abortion increases with the length of pregnancy,

from one death for every one million abortions at or before eight weeks to one per 29,000 at 16–20 weeks—and one per 11,000 at 21 or more weeks
 
You are a blatant liar. Do you think your attempts at deception advance your argument? I am sure it helps to convince imbeciles like pmp and patriot666, but you already had them on your side.

The law requires abortion clinics to become surgical centers. This is the part, not the 20 weeks limit, that causes concern about the ability to provide Texans with safe abortion alternatives.

The same tactics were used in Virginia where Cuccinelli used micromanagement and over regulation to close down abortion providers and wage his war on women.
 
Professor Baxter said:
You are a blatant liar. Do you think your attempts at deception advance your argument? I am sure it helps to convince imbeciles like pmp and patriot666, but you already had them on your side.

The law requires abortion clinics to become surgical centers. This is the part, not the 20 weeks limit, that causes concern about the ability to provide Texans with safe abortion alternatives.

The same tactics were used in Virginia where Cuccinelli used micromanagement and over regulation to close down abortion providers and wage his war on women.
Click to expand...

So you oppose them providing safer places for the women you care so much about? Maybe you prefer the conditions your hero Kermit Gosnell worked under.

But, here is the point fuck face. If only 3% of their business is abortions, then they don't have to CLOSE their doors right? They can still provide the other 97% of services they claim right shit stain?

You have been PWND again bitch. Unless of course you are going to tell me that Planned Parenthood is lying and that more than 3% of their business is related to killing babies. Your turn bitch
 
I Love America said:
So you oppose them providing safer places for the women you care so much about? Maybe you prefer the conditions your hero Kermit Gosnell worked under.

But, here is the point fuck face. If only 3% of their business is abortions, then they don't have to CLOSE their doors right? They can still provide the other 97% of services they claim right shit stain?

You have been PWND again bitch. Unless of course you are going to tell me that Planned Parenthood is lying and that more than 3% of their business is related to killing babies. Your turn bitch
Click to expand...

So now you are arguing that the government increases safety through greater regulation of business? So much for your pretense of supporting free markets.

If the bill closes the 37 centers it will not result in greater safety but less.

The Planned Parenthood locations may be able to continue as a going concern but they would not be able to provide abortions, which is what is being discussed. The 42 centers are not all Planned Parenthood Centers. Your gotcha is irrelevant, based on misinformation and lies.

You are a lying pos and a moron.
 
Professor Baxter said:
So now you are arguing that the government increases safety through greater regulation of business? So much for your pretense of supporting free markets.

If the bill closes the 37 centers it will not result in greater safety but less.

The Planned Parenthood locations may be able to continue as a going concern but they would not be able to provide abortions, which is what is being discussed. The 42 centers are not all Planned Parenthood Centers. Your gotcha is irrelevant, based on misinformation and lies.

You are a lying pos and a moron.
Click to expand...

If only one life can be saved, then it all will be worth it.

Spare me your free market claim. Your commie ass doesn't know shit squat about the free market. You love gobblement intervention. Now all of a sudden you don't like it. Personally, I love the free market and in a true free market, these baby killing mills would not thrive. But, we are only playing on the field you libtardiots set up. Deal with it bitch.
 
I Love America said:
If only one life can be saved, then it all will be worth it.

Spare me your free market claim. Your commie ass doesn't know shit squat about the free market. You love gobblement intervention. Now all of a sudden you don't like it. Personally, I love the free market and in a true free market, these baby killing mills would not thrive. But, we are only playing on the field you libtardiots set up. Deal with it bitch.
Click to expand...

You're a fascist pos that has no respect for free markets. You believe your partisan knee jerk reactions alone are enough to interfere in the market.
 
I Love America said:
If only one life can be saved, then it all will be worth it.

Spare me your free market claim. Your commie ass doesn't know shit squat about the free market. You love gobblement intervention. Now all of a sudden you don't like it. Personally, I love the free market and in a true free market, these baby killing mills would not thrive. But, we are only playing on the field you libtardiots set up. Deal with it bitch.
Click to expand...
So splain to me how in a free market, abortion providers would not be in business?
 
Socrtease said:
So splain to me how in a free market, abortion providers would not be in business?
Click to expand...
A free market requires that the service provider be held to uniform standards, and that includes up-front knowledge for the consumer of those services. That means the the provider needs to show the woman through ultrasound exactly what she's about to get with the money that she is spending.
 
DamnYankee said:
A free market requires that the service provider be held to uniform standards, and that includes up-front knowledge for the consumer of those services. That means the the provider needs to show the woman through ultrasound exactly what she's about to get with the money that she is spending.
Click to expand...

What is this, "a free market requires that the service provider be held to uniform standards?" Says who? Technological advancements such as ultrasounds are required for a free market? Funny I don't recall Smith, Mill or Ricardo mentioning anything about them. Would they have needed an xray, before getting a tooth pulled?

Many surgical procedures cannot guarantee anything near an exact result... are they prohibited in a free market?

Maybe you and ila are not the same person, after all. Ila, though vile and repugnant, is not as stupid as your argument would make him seem. I am sure he will come up with something a little less pathetic.
 
Professor Baxter said:
What is this, "a free market requires that the service provider be held to uniform standards?" Says who? Technological advancements such as ultrasounds are required for a free market? Funny I don't recall Smith, Mill or Ricardo mentioning anything about them. Would they have needed an xray, before getting a tooth pulled?

Many surgical procedures cannot guarantee anything near an exact result... are they prohibited in a free market?
Click to expand...

Says GovCo. That's we have weights and measures, labeling, service licensing, and product standards.
 
DamnYankee said:
A free market requires that the service provider be held to uniform standards, and that includes up-front knowledge for the consumer of those services. That means the the provider needs to show the woman through ultrasound exactly what she's about to get with the money that she is spending.
Click to expand...
If a woman chooses to have an ultrasound, by all means she should have one.

But to suggest that forcing her to have one is somehow consonant with a 'free market' (or any other kind of freedom) is plainly ludicrous.
 
sedan said:
If a woman chooses to have an ultrasound, by all means she should have one.

But to suggest that forcing her to have one is somehow consonant with a 'free market' (or any other kind of freedom) is plainly ludicrous.
Click to expand...

I agree. However service providers should be forced to offer to educate her. Wouldn't you agree?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top