YOu ain't all there, are you.
YOu know nothing about economics, that much is clear.
Wealth gaps are not a good thing.
Wealth gaps, as defined by
@LurchAddams as mere "wealth differences", are essential; they are measures of the economy.
Wealth Gap = 0 -> No economy; Everybody equally broke and miserable, like
@Crepitus.
Struggling/Anemic Economy -> Wealth Gap = Very Small, i.e. Everybody impoverished, not much difference between the poorest and the "richest".
Super-Power House, Globally Dominating Economy -> Wealth Gap = Immense / Grand Canyon, because there are many, many middle class people, and many, many affluent people, and many, many rich people, and many, many very rich people, and many, many uber-rich people, and many, many who are richer than that.
You really should just bugger-off and move your economics-challenged azz to Venezuela where your neighbors will all be poor like you, and where the only wealth gap of which to speak requires a magnifying glass to find ... and leave
We the People to enjoy our World-Dominating "wealth gap".
They almost invariably lead to things like revolutions.
Nope. It's always the zero-wealth-gap that leads to revolutions. Huge wealth gaps are formed from extreme propsperity. Go suck an egg.