The new liberal pastime: Silencing free speech on College Campuses.

CFM said:
You disagreed with him.
Click to expand...

Yup I am a racist for pointing out liberal idiocy on college campuses and showing how hypocritical and dissonant they are.

Funny thing is, no one is buying there bullshit anymore. Once you call EVERYONE a racist, it wears the meaning out.
 
Irish said:
I read it, you're a racist. You hate white males. So you are sexist too. I'm taking away you free speech.

If you're on a college campus I will storm in a snatch the mic out of your hands. Like these libtards do to people.
Click to expand...

You believe whites are superior to other races.
That is what a racist is.
 
“The new liberal pastime: Silencing free speech on College Campuses.”

Wrong.

The doctrine of free speech applies solely to the relationship between government and those governed, not between and among private persons and organizations.

One private person cannot ‘violate’ the free speech rights of another private person.
 
Watch as these "open-minded" liberals shut down the free speech of an openly gay republican activist.
Click to expand...

This fails as both a hasty generalization fallacy and straw man fallacy.

Hasty generalization: what one persons, or a small group of persons, might say or do is not ‘representative’ of an entire class of persons, just as the individuals in the video are not ‘representative’ of ‘all liberals’ – assuming they’re ‘liberals’ to begin with.

Straw man: the OP contrives a lie about liberals in an effort to misrepresent their position, in this case the lie that liberals are ‘hostile’ to free speech, when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.

The OP then attacks the lie contrived (straw man) claiming ‘victory,’ but actually the thread premise is just a lie.
 
F_Donald_Weldon said:
“The new liberal pastime: Silencing free speech on College Campuses.”

Wrong.

The doctrine of free speech applies solely to the relationship between government and those governed, not between and among private persons and organizations.

One private person cannot ‘violate’ the free speech rights of another private person.
Click to expand...

Not true at all. So does the individual have the right to punch the person in the face?

Or is assault only against the govt on the people?

See how dumb libtards like yourself are.
 
F_Donald_Weldon said:
This fails as both a hasty generalization fallacy and straw man fallacy.

Hasty generalization: what one persons, or a small group of persons, might say or do is not ‘representative’ of an entire class of persons, just as the individuals in the video are not ‘representative’ of ‘all liberals’ – assuming they’re ‘liberals’ to begin with.

Straw man: the OP contrives a lie about liberals in an effort to misrepresent their position, in this case the lie that liberals are ‘hostile’ to free speech, when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.

The OP then attacks the lie contrived (straw man) claiming ‘victory,’ but actually the thread premise is just a lie.
Click to expand...

Liberals are now hostile to free speech. They believe shutting down anyone who they disagree with is their path to victory.

Its new, they used to be in favor of speech, but have decided to go down a different road.

I made no strawmen.
 
I got about 6 minutes in. Does this idiot ever say anything in the video, or does he just keep on pandering to a bunch of delusional Trump supporters?

Gotta love Breitbart. The caption says 'Liberals keep people from entering'

Really? Cops are liberals? The venue was full. Nobody was allowed to enter.
 
Irish said:
So when did the left switch from free speech advocates, to stalinism? And why?

Answer, to advance their utopian dream. That requires squashing pesky decent. That's why they invented PC. They can easily squash anyone by simply yelling racist, bigot, over and over again to anyone who isn't towing the speech line.
Click to expand...

Let's discuss how the RNC wanted to invoke Stalinism at their upcoming convention but got slapped down by a federal judge.

"A federal judge on Thursday scrapped the city of Cleveland's plans for a heightened-security zone that would have encompassed most of downtown during the Republican National Convention, saying that the restrictions are burdensome to people who want to express their free-speech rights.

In his comments, the judge attacked several aspects of the event zone and the accompanying restrictions, which the city announced late last month:

  • He said the size of the event zone, is "unduly large."
  • He said the parade route is unconstitutionally insufficient.
  • The judge said the times at which people can hold parades, which is only for a few hours each day of the convention and not during the hours in which the delegates are expected to be downtown, are problematic.
  • Gwin said there are "constitutional problems with the use of the parks."

http://www.cleveland.com/metro/index.ssf/2016/06/federal_judge_overturns_rnc_re.html
 
Althea said:
I got about 6 minutes in. Does this idiot ever say anything in the video, or does he just keep on pandering to a bunch of delusional Trump supporters?

Gotta love Breitbart. The caption says 'Liberals keep people from entering'

Really? Cops are liberals? The venue was full. Nobody was allowed to enter.
Click to expand...

You didn't see the part where libtards were trying to block the entrance?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top