The Mapping Sharia in America Project

You failed to note or comprehend that the Wahhabis consider themselves the only true Islam and that followers of the remaining 16 major Islamic sects are therefore also infidels, which means there is no fucking way a Wahhabi cleric would lower himself to head a Sunni or Shia mosque, nor would either of those major sects allow a Wahhabi wacko to head their mosque, any more that a mainline Episcopalian church would hire Fred Phelps to be its priest. Wahhabism is a tiny, ultra radical subsect, not 80% of American Muslims, who are close to 90% Sunni (virtually all the remaining American Muslims are Shiite). That is the reality, so your sources are therefore bullshit There is no way 80% of American mosques are headed by Wahhabi clerics.

Lose the religious ignorance and bigotry. It's unAmerican,

You failed to know that whahhabi's are sunni's. You further failed to understand that for the conquering of the infidel (the common enemy) differences are set aside (note Iraq). Nor have you comprehended the fact that it is wahhabi's that own and control most of the mosques in the US.
 
You stupid fuck :)

To compare Judeo Christianity with the brutality of sharia proves THAT you are the idiot!

Mosques in the U.S. are gaining popularity. Of the 1,200 mosques currently operating in the U.S., nearly 80 percent have been built in the past 12 years.

A large majority of mosques in the United States are led by Wahhabi clerics. Wahhabism is an extreme brand of Islam practiced dominantly in Saudi Arabia. According to Muslim estimates, up to 80 percent of mosques in the U.S. are owned, operated and led by Wahhabis.

These radical mosques often promote the installation of Sharia law, an extreme ideology that considers ‘non-believers’ to be infidels. According to Wahhabis, Jihad or support of Jihad is a Muslim duty. They believe that suicide bombers and martyrs are worthy of the highest praise and reward. And radicals are anticipating the day when an Islamic state will one day span the U.S.

--------------------------------------------

This all sourced in a previous post!


BTW, show me where i compared "Judeo Christianity" with Islam. i made no such comparison, as a comparison entails examining and enumerating details of those things being compared, and since there is no logical proof for any religious position, a value judgment is almost unavoidable. I made no such value judgment on any religion, per se. I did, however make a value judgment on religious fanatics, and although not using that term, I decried those who would happily force non-adherents to obey their religious rules, which is the very essence of religious fanaticism, and to a non-believer, there isn't a lick of difference between Islamic fundamentalists with their sharia law and Christian fundamentalists and their expressed desire to criminalize homosexuality, repress the rights of women, and discriminate against other-believers, nonbelievers and disbelievers.

And while you're at it, maybe you can tell me exactly what "Judeo Christianity" is? It's an odd choice for a name, given the Christian proclivity for scapegoating and demonizing Jews, up to and including murdering them as heretics during the Spanish Inquisition, and rounding them up and shipping them to the death camps during Germany's bout of Nazism. Hitler was a Christian, despite the efforts to paint him as an atheist. Would an atheist have "Gott mit uns" on the belt buckles of his armed forces? Go ahead. Look it up. I'll wait right here. Now, you were saying Islam is brutal. Okay. As compared to what? The Inquisition? The Crusades? The Salem witch trials? The murder of Joan of Arc? i'd say tying someone to a stake and burning her alive in the name of God is pretty fucking brutal.

But I guess it all depends on whose ox is being gored.
 
BTW, show me where i compared "Judeo Christianity" with Islam. i made no such comparison, as a comparison entails examining and enumerating details of those things being compared, and since there is no logical proof for any religious position, a value judgment is almost unavoidable. I made no such value judgment on any religion, per se. I did, however make a value judgment on religious fanatics, and although not using that term, I decried those who would happily force non-adherents to obey their religious rules, which is the very essence of religious fanaticism, and to a non-believer, there isn't a lick of difference between Islamic fundamentalists with their sharia law and Christian fundamentalists and their expressed desire to criminalize homosexuality, repress the rights of women, and discriminate against other-believers, nonbelievers and disbelievers.

And while you're at it, maybe you can tell me exactly what "Judeo Christianity" is? It's an odd choice for a name, given the Christian proclivity for scapegoating and demonizing Jews, up to and including murdering them as heretics during the Spanish Inquisition, and rounding them up and shipping them to the death camps during Germany's bout of Nazism. Hitler was a Christian, despite the efforts to paint him as an atheist. Would an atheist have "Gott mit uns" on the belt buckles of his armed forces? Go ahead. Look it up. I'll wait right here. Now, you were saying Islam is brutal. Okay. As compared to what? The Inquisition? The Crusades? The Salem witch trials? The murder of Joan of Arc? i'd say tying someone to a stake and burning her alive in the name of God is pretty fucking brutal.

But I guess it all depends on whose ox is being gored.

Only right-wing websites and publications claim that most U.S. mosques are run by Wahhabi clerics. Re: a study made by Freedom House (Click)

However, the center's study on Saudi hate ideology seemed to suffer from a problem that critics charge is endemic in much of Freedom House's work: It drew stark conclusions from inadequate, selective research. In this case, Freedom House seemed to rifle through the libraries of only a handful of mosques across the United States and then implied in its conclusions that what it found in these mosques applied generally to mosques throughout the country. The Institute for Social Policy and Understanding (ISPU) opined in a review of the Freedom House report: "The study clearly shows that these 15 American mosques included some very hateful books in [their] libraries. However, to suggest that all American mosques are filled with such publications is a stretch."

ISPU criticized the center for its "uncritical" support of the view, promoted by Hisham Kabbani and Stephen Schwartz, that 80-85% of American mosques are controlled by Wahabbis. The institute pointed to its own 2004 study of Detroit-area mosques, which found that only 6% of the city's mosque-attending population had salafist/wahabbi views, and concluded that "the vast majority of American Muslims eschew extremist views." Although its study had received widespread attention and was released months before the Freedom House report, says ISPU, the Center for Religious Freedom failed to acknowledge or refer to its results.
 
BTW, show me where i compared "Judeo Christianity" with Islam. i made no such comparison, as a comparison entails examining and enumerating details of those things being compared, and since there is no logical proof for any religious position, a value judgment is almost unavoidable. I made no such value judgment on any religion, per se. I did, however make a value judgment on religious fanatics, and although not using that term, I decried those who would happily force non-adherents to obey their religious rules, which is the very essence of religious fanaticism, and to a non-believer, there isn't a lick of difference between Islamic fundamentalists with their sharia law and Christian fundamentalists and their expressed desire to criminalize homosexuality, repress the rights of women, and discriminate against other-believers, nonbelievers and disbelievers.

And while you're at it, maybe you can tell me exactly what "Judeo Christianity" is? It's an odd choice for a name, given the Christian proclivity for scapegoating and demonizing Jews, up to and including murdering them as heretics during the Spanish Inquisition, and rounding them up and shipping them to the death camps during Germany's bout of Nazism. Hitler was a Christian, despite the efforts to paint him as an atheist. Would an atheist have "Gott mit uns" on the belt buckles of his armed forces? Go ahead. Look it up. I'll wait right here. Now, you were saying Islam is brutal. Okay. As compared to what? The Inquisition? The Crusades? The Salem witch trials? The murder of Joan of Arc? i'd say tying someone to a stake and burning her alive in the name of God is pretty fucking brutal.

But I guess it all depends on whose ox is being gored.

How many hundreds of years do you have to go back to make your comparison between chrisitianity and modern day islamists?

That's pretty hilarous, and renders your point of view idiotic.
 
BTW, show me where i compared "Judeo Christianity" with Islam. i made no such comparison, as a comparison entails examining and enumerating details of those things being compared, and since there is no logical proof for any religious position, a value judgment is almost unavoidable. I made no such value judgment on any religion, per se. I did, however make a value judgment on religious fanatics, and although not using that term, I decried those who would happily force non-adherents to obey their religious rules, which is the very essence of religious fanaticism, and to a non-believer, there isn't a lick of difference between Islamic fundamentalists with their sharia law and Christian fundamentalists and their expressed desire to criminalize homosexuality, repress the rights of women, and discriminate against other-believers, nonbelievers and disbelievers.

And while you're at it, maybe you can tell me exactly what "Judeo Christianity" is? It's an odd choice for a name, given the Christian proclivity for scapegoating and demonizing Jews, up to and including murdering them as heretics during the Spanish Inquisition, and rounding them up and shipping them to the death camps during Germany's bout of Nazism. Hitler was a Christian, despite the efforts to paint him as an atheist. Would an atheist have "Gott mit uns" on the belt buckles of his armed forces? Go ahead. Look it up. I'll wait right here. Now, you were saying Islam is brutal. Okay. As compared to what? The Inquisition? The Crusades? The Salem witch trials? The murder of Joan of Arc? i'd say tying someone to a stake and burning her alive in the name of God is pretty fucking brutal.

But I guess it all depends on whose ox is being gored.

How many hundreds of years do you have to go back to make your comparison between chrisitianity and modern day islamists?

That's pretty hilarous, and renders your point of view idiotic.
 
Wafa Sultan’s message to America

Under Islamic sharia, a woman is not considered a free being. She is mentally unfit to decide her own life.





The rest here
Uh...that's what Saint Thomas Aquinas preached and he's a hero of Christianity. The state of Texas removed Thomas Jefferson from the history books and replaced him with Tom Aquinas and that clearly shows that Evangelical Law is just as dangerous to our liberty as Sharia Law....IMHO
 
Open the Koran, which is perfect in every syllable, and read it, infidel. You will see how little compassion need be wasted on those whom Allah (Praise be upon Him) who is infinitely wise has cursed the infidel. He prolongs their life and prosperity so that they may continue heaping sin upon sin and all the more richly deserve the torments that await them.
 
Back
Top