Yes, in fact, they can when he refuses to cooperate.
If there is no issue of fact at dispute there is no trial on the facts. BUT RUDY GETS A JURY TRIAL PER THE CONSTITUTION. N this case, since there is no issue of fact for the jury to decide, the jury gos right to damages. THIS IS A JURY TRIAL. It isn’t his lack of cooperation per se, it’s he fact that he admitted to all elements of the plaintiffs clam. His failure to cooperate can lead the judge to inform the jury that Rudy is hiding evidence that could impact the amount of damages. Tdak is just a complete fucking moron. It’s sublime