The lonesome death of “you’re a racist”

Beaten to death? Maybe. But I think it deserves a thread: calling someone a racist, without evidence of real racism, is bad news. It’s weak, it’s lazy, it’s incendiary and it is the refuge of the intellectually bankrupt.

I had quite a few posters the past few days tell me to just get over it, to let the anger of those falsely using the term lash out unfettered, to let posters who racebait continue to racebait. I was told that I was self-absorbed and self-pitying for taking time to deny the charge. And let’s not make any mistake about this: it’s a serious accusation. It’s not calling someone an idiot, or a fool. If you believe racism is a serious issue, then you believe it’s a serious accusation. You can’t have it both ways.

I was told that I was a racist for respecting the verdict of the jurors in the GZ case. I was told I was a racist for finding some of the evidence ambiguous & inconclusive. I was told that I was a racist for denying that I was with passion – that if I wasn’t, the accusation wouldn’t bother me. I was told I was a racist for not agreeing with a crazy person.

Then, something very interesting happened. Former President & liberal icon Jimmy Carter agreed with me. He said the same thing I said. The logical conclusion? He must be a racist, too.

And this is when the baiters, the grenade throwers, the ones who so carelessly lob that term out to their political opponents – they scattered like cockroaches when the lights go on. One made a lame attempt to try to argue that Carter – Jimmy friggin’ Carter - is a man who generally tries to appease Republicans, and who doesn’t really speak his mind. But the rest split. It was like watching a computer overload when given two conflicting instructions.

It was a glorious thing to see such a high level of hypocrisy exposed. Those who use this term carelessly, recklessly & to only serve a political agenda are no better than the real racists, imo. They are just as divisive; just as worthy of condemnation.
 
good thing it was done because you could not explain why you discounted a witness for nothing who was black.

that is a good reason.

then you said I was being divisive for backing the African American position on this
 
good thing it was done because you could not explain why you discounted a witness for nothing who was black.

that is a good reason.

then you said I was being divisive for backing the African American position on this

Those are 2 lies. I never discounted the witness, and I didn't say you were divisive FOR backing the African American position; I just said you were divisive, and you are.

How about Jimmy Carter, desh?
 
why did you claim I was being divisive?

go get any post of mine that was.

You refuse to present the facts for your case
 
Those are 2 lies. I never discounted the witness, and I didn't say you were divisive FOR backing the African American position; I just said you were divisive, and you are.

How about Jimmy Carter, desh?


did you consider her testimony as an ear witness ?

If you did then you would have to KNOW trayvon was jumped by zimmy
 
did you consider her testimony as an ear witness ?

If you did then you would have to KNOW trayvon was jumped by zimmy

I did consider it, as well as everything else that was presented.

Why are you ignoring the question about Jimmy Carter, desh? Is he a racist?
 
I did consider it, as well as everything else that was presented.

Why are you ignoring the question about Jimmy Carter, desh? Is he a racist?

he had nothing to do with the case.

there was a witness who HEARD trayvon being attacked.


that means Zimmy jumped him
 
here is what you don't get.


that law did NOT prevent them from doing the right thing.


they could have convicted him like they should have.

He would have gone to prison or did some lawyerly moves for a new trial.




the country and trayvon would have been far better served by that
 
here is what you don't get.


that law did NOT prevent them from doing the right thing.


they could have convicted him like they should have.

He would have gone to prison or did some lawyerly moves for a new trial.




the country and trayvon would have been far better served by that

Don't use the return key so much.

Is Jimmy Carter a racist, desh?
 
I feel like that dude at the end of Braveheart who was just trying to get William Wallace to confess to avoid further suffering..."This can all end...just say your liberal hero was a racist..."
 
he is a citizen and has a right to his opinion.

Did he say the young women who witnessed Trayvons death was a witness who was impeached by the facts like you did?
 
Back
Top