the last two GOP presidents lost the popular vote, stole office

No, what you are doing now is attempting to save face, too late, you implied in your posts that Democrats didn't care about the electoral college prior to 2016, which I easily showed you were incorrect, and now you are attempting to stretch it by claiming only the actual wording you cited would prove Democrats cared prior to 2016. You f*cked up, not my problem

No, I didn't.

I don't recall DEMOCRATS calling the Electoral College an "18th century embarrassment" prior to November 9th, 2016.

:thinking:

Are you stupid, dishonest, or both? I suspect the latter, based on your posts.
 
Clinton won 487 counties nationwide, compared with 2,626 for President-elect Donald Trump.

But hey let's let the takers decide who should win!

Oh no, you are not going to show us the map again are your? Few people live in this counties, and last I knew people elected their leaders, not cows
 
Oh no, you are not going to show us the map again are your? Few people live in this counties, and last I knew people elected their leaders, not cows

check this out:

The 10 Least Populated US Counties

Rank County Population

1 Kalawao County, Hawaii 88
2 Loving County, Texas 134
3 King County, Texas 296
4 Kenedy County, Texas 417
5 Arthur County, Nebraska 457
6 Blaine County, Nebraska 482
7 McPherson County, Nebraska 499
8 Petroleum County, Montana 523
9 Yakutat Borough, Alaska 605
10 Loup County, Nebraska 609
 
No, I didn't.

Are you stupid, dishonest, or both? I suspect the latter, based on your posts.

And now he doubles down repearing the same idiocy, kinda like his corny copy and paste pictures off whacked out right wing websites where he bans nearly everyone, nothing new to offer, say good night "copy," you're done
 
And now he doubles down repearing the same idiocy, kinda like his corny copy and paste pictures off whacked out right wing websites where he bans nearly everyone, nothing new to offer, say good night "copy," you're done

Lesion has been around trolling internet forums for years, rant never changes
 
This gets more interesting every time I see it, it has gone from a straight Republic,
Just saying 'Republic' is correct (there's nothing wrong with that); that just doesn't specify that there are several layers of Republics. That's all the word 'federated' means...

to Constitutional Republic,
This is correct as well, although redundant, as one is essentially saying the same thing twice... A Republic already IS a constitutional form of government, so to add Constitutional in front of it is redundant...

and now Federated Republic.
This is the most specific/accurate way to describe what the USA is. This is specifying that there are several layers of Republics within the USA (federal, state, local...)


It is a Democratc Republic,
Wrong. This is a paradox. There is no such thing. A Democracy is 'mob rule' (rule of people), while a Republic is 'constitutional rule' (rule of law [a ruling document]). A country cannot be both a Democracy and a Republic. It is one or the other...

we elect our leaders democratically to serve as out representatives in a Republican form of Government.
Correct, but "democratic elections" doesn't make a country into a Democracy. "Democratic elections" can occur in Republics as well, as you have just described here... It's just a particular method of electing representatives; it has nothing to do with the form of government itself.

Federated implies the structure of the Governmemt, not how we arrived at that framework.
Yup. It means that there are several layers of Republics.

And Federalism implies the relationship between the individual States and Federal Gov't, again the framework, but not how we elect our leaders
We democratically elect leaders, but that doesn't make us a Democracy. We are a Federated Republic. See the U.S. Constitution...
 
Just saying 'Republic' is correct (there's nothing wrong with that); that just doesn't specify that there are several layers of Republics. That's all the word 'federated' means...


This is correct as well, although redundant, as one is essentially saying the same thing twice... A Republic already IS a constitutional form of government, so to add Constitutional in front of it is redundant...


This is the most specific/accurate way to describe what the USA is. This is specifying that there are several layers of Republics within the USA (federal, state, local...)



Wrong. This is a paradox. There is no such thing. A Democracy is 'mob rule' (rule of people), while a Republic is 'constitutional rule' (rule of law [a ruling document]). A country cannot be both a Democracy and a Republic. It is one or the other...


Correct, but "democratic elections" doesn't make a country into a Democracy. "Democratic elections" can occur in Republics as well, as you have just described here... It's just a particular method of electing representatives; it has nothing to do with the form of government itself.


Yup. It means that there are several layers of Republics.


We democratically elect leaders, but that doesn't make us a Democracy. We are a Federated Republic. See the U.S. Constitution...

Libertarian horseshit ^^

now we call Looneytarians Tea Baggers
 
And now he doubles down repearing the same idiocy, kinda like his corny copy and paste pictures off whacked out right wing websites where he bans nearly everyone, nothing new to offer, say good night "copy," you're done


So you don't have any examples of DEMOCRATS calling the Electoral College an "18th century embarrassment" prior to November 9th, 2016?
 
Just saying 'Republic' is correct (there's nothing wrong with that); that just doesn't specify that there are several layers of Republics. That's all the word 'federated' means...


This is correct as well, although redundant, as one is essentially saying the same thing twice... A Republic already IS a constitutional form of government, so to add Constitutional in front of it is redundant...


This is the most specific/accurate way to describe what the USA is. This is specifying that there are several layers of Republics within the USA (federal, state, local...)



Wrong. This is a paradox. There is no such thing. A Democracy is 'mob rule' (rule of people), while a Republic is 'constitutional rule' (rule of law [a ruling document]). A country cannot be both a Democracy and a Republic. It is one or the other...


Correct, but "democratic elections" doesn't make a country into a Democracy. "Democratic elections" can occur in Republics as well, as you have just described here... It's just a particular method of electing representatives; it has nothing to do with the form of government itself.


Yup. It means that there are several layers of Republics.


We democratically elect leaders, but that doesn't make us a Democracy. We are a Federated Republic. See the U.S. Constitution...

Libertarian horseshit ^^
now we call Looneytarians Tea Baggers

Absurdity; a sure sign of the last desperate refuge for liars, fools and ignorance; and those who have lost their arguments. Yay you! :clap:
 
Absurdity; a sure sign of the last desperate refuge for liars, fools and ignorance; and those who have lost their arguments. Yay you! :clap:

If Legionnaires Disease, Banjofuck, and Bullshit Blob summed together their IQ scores, the result would be lower than the smallest shoe size among them.
This defective organism thinks that he gets to decide what's absurd?
I wonder who wasted his/her time helping Blob to spell absurdity.
 
If Legionnaires Disease, Banjofuck, and Bullshit Blob summed together their IQ scores, the result would be lower than the smallest shoe size among them.
This defective organism thinks that he gets to decide what's absurd?
I wonder who wasted his/her time helping Blob to spell absurdity.

Pathetic whiny lunatic; she's triggered. :laugh:

giphy.gif
 
Back
Top