The Key Question for Trumps criminality...

AProudLefty said:
They can get out with your help. Or you could call 911. Or call for help. Anything.

Good deflection though.
Click to expand...

Now you bringing in all sorts of trivial objections. By now specifying actions I might take without knowing the specific circumstances, you are just loading the question. "Anything" is just another sweeping generality. But in any case, I am under no specific legal requirement to help someone in that situation, only a moral one, so it doesn't circle back to the original question here posed by Jarod which is based on a legal issue.
 
BidenPresident said:
Look, only dumb people keep talking about logical fallacies.
Click to expand...

Only smart people know what logical fallacies are and will explain them (unlike some other posters who regularly trot them out).

Idiots ignore logical fallacies because they make their positions fall apart, not to mention making any sort of argument harder to pursue.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Now you bringing in all sorts of trivial objections. By now specifying actions I might take without knowing the specific circumstances, you are just loading the question. "Anything" is just another sweeping generality. But in any case, I am under no specific legal requirement to help someone in that situation, only a moral one, so it doesn't circle back to the original question here posed by Jarod which is based on a legal issue.
Click to expand...

You seem to not understand that inaction can result in a criminal charge, especially when a person is responsible for what transpired.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Only smart people know what logical fallacies are and will explain them (unlike some other posters who regularly trot them out).

Idiots ignore logical fallacies because they make their positions fall apart, not to mention making any sort of argument harder to pursue.
Click to expand...

I know what the logical fallacies are. Only dumb people think talking about them makes them look smart. Argue, make your case, respond to objections. How debate works.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Only smart people know what logical fallacies are and will explain them (unlike some other posters who regularly trot them out).

Idiots ignore logical fallacies because they make their positions fall apart, not to mention making any sort of argument harder to pursue.
Click to expand...

Only dumbasses would think it's a complex question fallacy. It is not.

If Trump did not influence 1/6 and was not aware that it would happen and not aware it was happening, he would not be criminally responsible.
 
“"firsthand testimony" that during the attack, Trump's daughter and then-senior adviser Ivanka Trump asked him to intervene.”
 
Stone said:
Not only cant the democrats pull this off, more importantly they WONT EVEN TRY. There is a very VERY good reason they wont even try. It is 22 now. Its called SAVE OWN ASS because the houses be a flippin. ;)
Click to expand...

That depends on how much election fraud by Democrats there is.
 
Jarod said:
Yup, doing nothing when you have a duty to do so is a crime.
Click to expand...
What duty? Void argument fallacy.
Jarod said:
Doing nothing with an intent to cause something can be an intentional act,
Click to expand...
Void argument fallacy.
Jarod said:
but I do not expect your simple mind to grasp that.
Click to expand...
Insult fallacy.
Jarod said:
Ill put it in very simple terms, if a parent does nothing while his baby starves to death, that "doing nothing" was a crime.
Click to expand...
Contrivance. Attempted proof by void. No argument presented.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
What you don't grasp is the way you put it makes Trump guilty regardless of what he did. In other words, you didn't ask a question at all, but simply gave us your conclusion that Trump is guilty. That's the whole basis for a complex question fallacy.
Click to expand...

Correct. He is now making a circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top