The image of Trump will rot immediately after his death

jimmymccready

Verified User
Conservative strategist and co-founder of the Lincoln Project Rick Wilson laid out what a post-Trump world may look like, and what revelations would follow, in a column published Wednesday.

The "miracle" of Trump will decay immediately.

“When Donald Trump dies, the myth will begin to decay almost instantly; his cult will keep the flame alive for a while, but the records will outlive the rally faithful,” Wilson wrote on his Substack “Against All Enemies."

“History will not remember him as a king, or a savior. History will remember him as a small, ugly, sick man who happened to seize great power, who wielded it recklessly, and who left behind a trail of destruction, corruption and cowardice unmatched in American history.”

Sticking with Trump’s health, Wilson predicted that following Trump’s passing, a trove of documents related to his physical and mental condition would be unearthed, documents that would reveal that his “cardiac and mental decline was charted in careful, hidden memos.”

Wilson also anticipated that revelations around the president’s ties with Jeffrey Epstein – the convicted sex offender who died in 2019 awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges – would come to light, and made several startling predictions about who in Trump’s cabinet may be held to account for potentially covering up those ties.

“Epstein’s web of power, blackmail, and sexual exploitation reached deep into America’s elite, and we’ll learn Trump was in the thick of it,” Wilson wrote. “The [Justice Department’s] illegal Epstein coverup and corrupt pardon of Ghislaine Maxwell will unravel, and by the end, [Attorney General] Pam Bondi, [Deputy Attorney General] Todd Blanche, [FBI Director] Kash Patel, and [FBI Deputy Director] Dan Bongino will be in prison.”
Details on Trump’s business dealings, many of which have enriched the president to the tune of billions of dollars, would also be laid to bare following his passing, Wilson noted, details that he argued history would not look well upon.
“The Trumpcoin scams, the garbage social media platform, the grifty deals with foreign powers, the bribes for pardons…all of it will be seen for what it is; a criminal enterprise, a mobster bustout of an entire nation,” Wilson wrote.
“History will learn about the shell companies, the overseas accounts, the backroom deals where American policy was auctioned off like a Mar-a-Lago dinner table.”

Ultimately, Wilson argued that through the wave of revelations following the president’s passing, a clear picture of Trump would be painted: that of someone whose “only interest was control.”
 
Just a note: The Lincoln Project is a Leftist to radical Leftist group of persons engaged in journalism and related areas. They are nowhere near "conservative."


So, while Rick Wilson bills himself as a "conservative political commentator" he is anything but.


His current published pieces usually appear in The Daily Beast, Politico, and other Leftwing publications. He has a large presence on Bluesky too.
 
Speak for yourself. Those who "may not recover" are the hardcore Trumpers, most of whom are over fifty and as a whole comprise well under half the electorate. Trump is an aberration and a speck in time.
I probably never agree with any of your political analyses.
 
Just a note: The Lincoln Project is a Leftist to radical Leftist group of persons engaged in journalism and related areas. They are nowhere near "conservative."


So, while Rick Wilson bills himself as a "conservative political commentator" he is anything but.


His current published pieces usually appear in The Daily Beast, Politico, and other Leftwing publications. He has a large presence on Bluesky too.
Ad hominem fallacy. Your playbook. Your rule.
 
Completely untrue.
R.6c90fba8cc1ed9beb4cadc29fd52b9d0
 
Do not deny that you have been doing the same to others. :nono:
Others simply dismiss the source without commentary. Stating a source is biased based on factual evidence is not ad hominem, as I didn't dismiss the source on that basis, nor did I, in this case, attempt to refute what was presented. I simply stated that calling the writer, Rick Wilson, "conservative" was untrue, as that was stated in the original post.

Rick Wilson, as demonstrated by his recent published works, the general tenor of the Lincoln Project, and his associations is not a conservative. His commentary that was posted following that, I didn't comment on.

Again, that's not "ad hominem."

Now, if I had stated, as examples,

Rick Wilson is a lying sack of shit, or The Lincoln Project is a lying Leftist, useless turd, that would be ad hominem.
 
Back
Top