The Hospital shooting gives us three AR style weapons in a row massacring Americans,

And as the reader can clearly see, when faced with FACTS that don't support or wholly validate his assertions, Rune just goes off into gun flunky revisionist mode.

Pity for him others actually read content of links and follow the chronology of the posts. My link clearly defines how the logistics and time frame in Columbine greatly differ from that of Uvalde and even Buffalo. The common denominator being the nut jobs intent on mass murder with semi-automatic weapons that were formally on the 1994 AWB list.

As the old saying goes, the devil is in the details. Pity my little Rune bitch doesn't understand that.

And he still has the psychological bent against female genitalia. The boy needs help.

The '94 ban was still in effect when the Columbine shooting occurred, liar.
Talk about ignorance.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
And as the reader can clearly see, when faced with FACTS that don't support or wholly validate his assertions, Rune just goes off into gun flunky revisionist mode.

Pity for him others actually read content of links and follow the chronology of the posts. My link clearly defines how the logistics and time frame in Columbine greatly differ from that of Uvalde and even Buffalo. The common denominator being the nut jobs intent on mass murder with semi-automatic weapons that were formally on the 1994 AWB list.

As the old saying goes, the devil is in the details. Pity my little Rune bitch doesn't understand that.

And he still has the psychological bent against female genitalia. The boy needs help.


The '94 ban was still in effect when the Columbine shooting occurred, liar.
Talk about ignorance.

Yes, let's talk about YOUR genuine and willful ignorance.

The Tec-9 was on the AWB 1994 list and was illegally purchased by the shooter, you blithering bumpkin! For your education:

https://www.vpc.org/studies/wgun990420.htm

Got that stupid? Your tin gods in Congress put this and other weapons back on the sales shelf....see how that worked out for the general public

Get your head out of LaPierre's rear end, do some objective research and THINK before your fingers hit the keys next time!
 
Unlike you, I provide documented, valid links to back up what I say.

You don't. Case in point; all you have to do is just copy and paste from my link OR A VALID SOURCE OF YOUR OWN where the cops of Columbine LET the "oldren" (?) children die than risk their own safety.

Also, anyone with a G.E.D. in reading comprehension knows that the sheer logistical difference of the Columbine school and the Uvalde school would make your statement absurd.

Put up or STFU, you phony.

Oh and while you're seeing that shrink about your hatred of female genitalia, you may want to ask for help with your other obsession with gay sex. Carry on.

No, Touchy, I don't have to do anything.
Go fuck yourself.
 
and this guy, like the others, bought his AR legally

America has experienced 20 mass shootings in a week, 12 the last weekend alone, 27 school shootings since January, 213 mass shootings already in 2022, and the right keeps telling us more guns is the answer

We are not free when our kids can’t go to school, or anyone attend a movie, a concert, visit the supermarket, a club, a spa, attend church, or go to a Mall while living in fear of our lives

Do you not know terrorism when you see it? This shit is organized. Now all we have to figure out is who is organizing it.

I have some thoughts on that.
 
So it's just the FACT that she is for gun control yet owns 2 weapons just has your panties in a bunch, ehh?

Newsflash, genius....there is a hefty percentage of NRA members who have no problem with the current gun control proposals. So your trying to make hay out of this is just LaPierre piss in the wind.

Oh, and see a therapist about this negative obsession of yours with female genitalia. It's starting to get creepy.

Unconstitutional. Discard of the Constitution of the United States.
 
Sorry toodles, but the chronology of the posts won't let you BS your way out of this. You tried to insinuate some type of negative connotation about a gun owner being for gun control. My question was simple.....what is your point in mentioning this?

Now stop babbling, man...answer the damned question.

Unconstitutional.
 
And there you have it, dear readers. This willfully ignorant and intellectually dishonest/impotent gun lobby flunky isn't even aware of a national/international news headline that is part of the gun control debate currently going on and most apropos to the OP here. Nope, old Roonie just babbles on....lying and denying, dodging and BS'ing....saying nothing yet talking loud....the chronology of the posts will always be his undoing.

Irrelevant. You are discarding the Constitution of the United States.
 
And as the reader can clearly see, when faced with FACTS that don't support or wholly validate his assertions, Rune just goes off into gun flunky revisionist mode.

Pity for him others actually read content of links and follow the chronology of the posts. My link clearly defines how the logistics and time frame in Columbine greatly differ from that of Uvalde and even Buffalo. The common denominator being the nut jobs intent on mass murder with semi-automatic weapons that were formally on the 1994 AWB list.

As the old saying goes, the devil is in the details. Pity my little Rune bitch doesn't understand that.

And he still has the psychological bent against female genitalia. The boy needs help.

Irrelevant. Discard of the Constitution of the United States.
 
Unlike you, I provide documented, valid links to back up what I say.

You don't. Case in point; all you have to do is just copy and paste from my link OR A VALID SOURCE OF YOUR OWN where the cops of Columbine LET the "oldren" (?) children die than risk their own safety.

Also, anyone with a G.E.D. in reading comprehension knows that the sheer logistical difference of the Columbine school and the Uvalde school would make your statement absurd.

Put up or STFU, you phony.

Oh and while you're seeing that shrink about your hatred of female genitalia, you may want to ask for help with your other obsession with gay sex. Carry on.

Holy Links to the Ministry of Truth are not valid.
 
Yes, let's talk about YOUR genuine and willful ignorance.

The Tec-9 was on the AWB 1994 list and was illegally purchased by the shooter, you blithering bumpkin! For your education:

https://www.vpc.org/studies/wgun990420.htm

Got that stupid? Your tin gods in Congress put this and other weapons back on the sales shelf....see how that worked out for the general public

Get your head out of LaPierre's rear end, do some objective research and THINK before your fingers hit the keys next time!

You are making a good case for carrying a gun.
 
bb341d8b04666fc352a079b15ed018c3660589581cf9b7109d01eb30d6834b0f_1-jpg.1009975
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Unlike you, I provide documented, valid links to back up what I say.

You don't. Case in point; all you have to do is just copy and paste from my link OR A VALID SOURCE OF YOUR OWN where the cops of Columbine LET the "oldren" (?) children die than risk their own safety.

Also, anyone with a G.E.D. in reading comprehension knows that the sheer logistical difference of the Columbine school and the Uvalde school would make your statement absurd.

Put up or STFU, you phony.

Oh and while you're seeing that shrink about your hatred of female genitalia, you may want to ask for help with your other obsession with gay sex. Carry on.



No, Touchy, I don't have to do anything.
Go fuck yourself.

translation: Old Rune can't meet a simple burden of proof, but he just loves to bleat his gun flunky BS ad nausea. Pity the little stupe doesn't realize this makes him a bonafide liar to any objective reader with a high school G.E.D. His last childish retort pretty much seals his fate as yet another intellectually dishonest and impotent gun lobby flunky. He's done, and I'm done here with him. He'll now have the usual circle jerk with his like minded brethren. Fortunately, their on the ignore list as well....saves a LOT of time and space when scrolling through a thread.
 
Yes, let's talk about YOUR genuine and willful ignorance.

The Tec-9 was on the AWB 1994 list and was illegally purchased by the shooter, you blithering bumpkin! For your education:

https://www.vpc.org/studies/wgun990420.htm

Got that stupid? Your tin gods in Congress put this and other weapons back on the sales shelf....see how that worked out for the general public

wait up......so you're trying to say that we need another 'assault' weapons ban because they work, but the columbine shooters were still able to illegally purchase a weapon that had been on that list for 5 years?????

how did that ban work again? maybe YOU need to get your head out of the VPC and brady campaigns ass and THINK before your fingers hit the keys next time.
 
translation: Old Rune can't meet a simple burden of proof, but he just loves to bleat his gun flunky BS ad nausea. Pity the little stupe doesn't realize this makes him a bonafide liar to any objective reader with a high school G.E.D. His last childish retort pretty much seals his fate as yet another intellectually dishonest and impotent gun lobby flunky. He's done, and I'm done here with him. He'll now have the usual circle jerk with his like minded brethren. Fortunately, their on the ignore list as well....saves a LOT of time and space when scrolling through a thread.

Ooh scary.
Touchy Feely faggot is finally going to stop trolling me.

Stay in touch with yourself, Cunt.
 
wait up......so you're trying to say that we need another 'assault' weapons ban because they work, but the columbine shooters were still able to illegally purchase a weapon that had been on that list for 5 years?????

how did that ban work again? maybe YOU need to get your head out of the VPC and brady campaigns ass and THINK before your fingers hit the keys next time.

Same old story, make guns illegal so that only criminals have guns.
The blatant stupidity of this strategy always underwhelms me.
Then the idiot uses examples of failures to try to make his point, as if his imaginary readers are as stupid as he is.
 
Back
Top