The Hospital shooting gives us three AR style weapons in a row massacring Americans,

[Into the Night]

and this guy, like the others, bought his AR legally

America has experienced 20 mass shootings in a week, 12 the last weekend alone, 27 school shootings since January, 213 mass shootings already in 2022, and the right keeps telling us more guns is the answer

We are not free when our kids can’t go to school, or anyone attend a movie, a concert, visit the supermarket, a club, a spa, attend church, or go to a Mall while living in fear of our lives

All the more reason to carry a gun.

 

[Into the Night]

You are the coward.
I am not scared of other people's guns.
Lie#1
Prove I have ever shifted my rhetoric. Do it now or shut the fuck you whining first Day with your period girl.

Lie#2 There are no assault weapons for sale to the public you lying diseased twat.

There's not even any such thing as an 'assault weapon'. This is strictly a buzzword. It tends to refer to the AR-15. The buzzword 'military style weapon' or 'military weapon' refers to the same thing.

The military actually uses many weapons, from pistols to artillery to rockets.
Don't know of any military that uses an AR-15 though.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes, bought it legally and bought it the same day as the shooting. Maybe after a waiting period he might have come to his senses and not committed the murders.


There is really no reason someone needs an AR15 and needs it NOW!

Yes there is. To protect yourself and others from murderers such as this.

 

[Into the Night]

But they can remember “shall not be infringed” as if it is a stand alone phrase

Discard of the Constitution of the United States and the constitutions of the various States. Semantics fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Good morning, hooter gal! I came up with a proposal:

What if we leave whatever guns are in circulation, offer to buy back as many as we can, voluntarily. <--- that would be step 1.

Step 2. The money. Outlaw campaign contributions from any gun manufacturer or lobbyist and make it illegal to advertise arms or ammo anywhere.

Step 3. No guns or ammo until 21.

So: If there's no money for politicians to worry about from the NRA or whoever.. then politicians can't be held hostage by the lobby. Secondly, there will be fewer guns in circulation.. you can keep yours, but now kids won't be tempted by those ads of sexy women hoisting big guns and stuff.

Unconstitutional. Bigotry.

 

[Into the Night]

I hope the gun grabbers aren't behind this shit -- we all know those socialist fuckers will say and do just about anything to get a full blown dictatorship up and running.

Wrong. They will do anything, including staging 'mass shootings' and killing people.

 

[Into the Night]

Yep. Minus, of course, that "well-regulated militia" part.

Discard of the Constitution of the United States and all State constitutions. Semantics fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Good ideas. I would also mandate a mandatory waiting period of at least five days, and establish a background check agency that will look at not just criminal and court records but also social media accounts and personal references. Employers do that all the time.

Unconstitutional.

 

[Into the Night]

That's right! I forgot the waiting period and... a national gun registry. We need to know who has these f'ing killing machines. Good point.

Unconstitutional.

 

[Into the Night]

Once the ball starts rolling on American mass shootings, there are always a couple more. It is going to be a bad couple of weeks. Just what we have to get used to, but only in America. Funny how that works.

Funny how some of these look staged by Democrats. You fucks don't give a rat's ass for anyone but yourselves.

 

[Into the Night]

Lobbying is a Constitutional right so scratch that.

Your best bet is a brief waiting period though I doubt it would work on this guy as he was out for vengeance.

Unconstitutional.

 

[Into the Night]

I know, bud. I was waiting for the first one of you to remind me that Repukes consider money, "speech" (citizens united).

Just know that anyone with less than a half mil in their bank account disagrees. Repukes have turned this nation into a Handmaids Tale nightmare.

Omniscience fallacy. You don't get to speak for everyone.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

Thank you, mods, for the blessings of the ignore feature.

 

[Celticguy]

Unconstitutional.

probably so but a bit more likely to get through Congress

 

[Taichiliberal]

That is just what is about to happen you disingenuous maggot licker.
1. Why is it needed for you to defend Owl Woman?
She can speak for herself.
Her lack of refutation makes it clear.
She is a hypocrite.

Yep, when jokers like Rune start babbling, sputtering and fuming like he does here, it's painfully obvious that he has NOTHING in terms of disproving what I posted. He's done, folks .... watch him follow my posts & threads like a bitch in heat when I put his useless flabby ass on the ignore list.

 

[Taichiliberal]

I have clearly and repeatedly said I don't know what kind of guns she has you mental defective.
Nothing dishonest.
She said it, she clearly is too honest to deny it, unlike you,
Cunt.

So it's just the FACT that she is for gun control yet owns 2 weapons just has your panties in a bunch, ehh?

Newsflash, genius....there is a hefty percentage of NRA members who have no problem with the current gun control proposals. So your trying to make hay out of this is just LaPierre piss in the wind.

Oh, and see a therapist about this negative obsession of yours with female genitalia. It's starting to get creepy.

 

[Taichiliberal]

What am I stalling about, you pseudo-intellectual?
I can't answer your questions because I don't know.

Lie in this post: I an not a right winger and you know it you fucking liar.
Never have been but have always been against gun control.

Sorry toodles, but the chronology of the posts won't let you BS your way out of this. You tried to insinuate some type of negative connotation about a gun owner being for gun control. My question was simple.....what is your point in mentioning this?

Now stop babbling, man...answer the damned question.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
If we are to go by the "logic" you display here, then what went down in Buffalo, NY blows the whole "good guy with a gun" scenario right out the water.

Also, you might want to enlighten the reading audience as to the number of mass shootings where the cops had a similar situation and acting as the Uvalde cops did.

If you can't, then you're just pulling more garbage out of the LaPierre handbook.

Off topic AND I have no idea what went "down" in Buffalo but I can tell you that one incident is not a trend.
2nd lie, never read or heard anything Lapierre said or wrote.

Again go fuck yourself.

And there you have it, dear readers. This willfully ignorant and intellectually dishonest/impotent gun lobby flunky isn't even aware of a national/international news headline that is part of the gun control debate currently going on and most apropos to the OP here. Nope, old Roonie just babbles on....lying and denying, dodging and BS'ing....saying nothing yet talking loud....the chronology of the posts will always be his undoing.

 

[Taichiliberal]

You asked for proof of other incidents then post a link supporting my position.

Go fuck yourself you bleeding gash.

And as the reader can clearly see, when faced with FACTS that don't support or wholly validate his assertions, Rune just goes off into gun flunky revisionist mode.

Pity for him others actually read content of links and follow the chronology of the posts. My link clearly defines how the logistics and time frame in Columbine greatly differ from that of Uvalde and even Buffalo. The common denominator being the nut jobs intent on mass murder with semi-automatic weapons that were formally on the 1994 AWB list.

As the old saying goes, the devil is in the details. Pity my little Rune bitch doesn't understand that.

And he still has the psychological bent against female genitalia. The boy needs help.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
What am I lying about, my little dumb bitch? I factually proved your claim about Columbine and Uvalde being the same in police response in Post #79 was factually incorrect. Read the contents of the link carefully and comprehensively before your fingers hit the keys again. In this case, you're being proved wrong doesn't make me liar. Capice?

Uh, NO YOU BRAINDEAD CUM GUZZLER.
THEY WERE BOTH THE SAME, THE COPS LET THE OLDREN DIE RATHER THAN RISK THEIR OWN SAFETY.
YOU LYING BITCH.

Unlike you, I provide documented, valid links to back up what I say.

You don't. Case in point; all you have to do is just copy and paste from my link OR A VALID SOURCE OF YOUR OWN where the cops of Columbine LET the "oldren" (?) children die than risk their own safety.

Also, anyone with a G.E.D. in reading comprehension knows that the sheer logistical difference of the Columbine school and the Uvalde school would make your statement absurd.

Put up or STFU, you phony.

Oh and while you're seeing that shrink about your hatred of female genitalia, you may want to ask for help with your other obsession with gay sex. Carry on.