THE HORRIFYING SCANDAL OF -SOON TO BE - JUSTICE KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

Dachshund

Verified User
"Blow-Hole" Joe Biden's: Black; Female; radical; leftist / "progressive" nominee, looks certain to have the numbers she needs to be appointed a Supreme Court justice.

A JUSTICE, Ketanji Brown Jackson, would constitute yet another outrageous balls-up for the Biden administration, and yet another body - blow for justice in America.

It seems to me that Judge Jackson already disqualified herself from a seat on the Supreme Court by her performance during the Senate confirmation hearings where she exposed herself as a LIAR on numerous occasions, as well as being a person who has no respect whatsoever for the Constitution. Add to the fact she is a proven abortion extremist and relied on George Soros' backing and the support of numerous "liberal" dark-money sponsors, in particular, "Democracy Alliance" to boost her bid for nomination and you, and it's patently obvious that Jackson in not fit to take a seat on the Supreme Court.


I DON'T GEDDIT ?? I mean, a person is a nominee for a seat on the Supreme Court and they are being interviewed by Senators during the Senate confirmation hearings. Right? Now this person, Judge Jackson, clearly knows that she is under oath. Despite this, SHE REPEATEDLY lied during the hearings !, and doing this is a FELONY. She was caught lying to Ted Cruz about her involvement in the Critical Race Theory (CRT) RED HANDED ! Why was she not immediately disqualified after she was first caught lying during the confirmation hearing ? No reasonable, average, American wants a person WHO IS A DEMONSTRATED LIAR (and one who has no qualms lying about very important legal issues) to be appointed as a Supreme Court Justice RIGHT ?.



JUDGE JACKSON: CRT and the "1619 Project



The transcript of a speech Judge Jackson gave at the Michigan University Law School reveal Jacksons as a long-time advocate for the Critical Race Theory movement. In the speech she expresses her admiration for the work of professor, Derrick Bell, an Afro-American academic who worked at Harvard Law School and is regarded as the God Father of CRT. The truth is that Bell was a radical racist, who praised such men as the maniacal, Black Supremacist, Louis Farrakhan. Farrakhan is a Black Islamist who is still leader of the notorious "Nation of Islam (NOI). He has: publicly praised Adolph Hitler a number of times as: "a very great man"; and believes a giant planet-sized spacecraft is continually hovering above the Earth (which it could destroy at time it wished using it enormous arsenal of super-powerful, advanced weaponry). He discovered this in 1985 when he was "beamed up" into this UFO - which he calls the "Mother Wheel" and heard a voice waring him of the outbreak of war in the near future". The voice was that of ,Elijah Mohammed, the previous leader of the NOI (now deceased) In life he had been revered by the NOI as a God-like Holy Man and sage; though had to do some fast talking when it was revealed he had been screwing literally dozens of teenage girls: housemaids; students, secretaries, etc; for years in his palace :yay::yay: To continue, year after his encounter with the UFO, while he was in Ghana, Farrakhan received lucid, mystical insight the US President, Ronald Reagan, was preparing to topple Colonel Gaddafi regime in Libya, and realized that this was what the disembodied voice of Elijah Mohammad in the UFO was prophesizing. So Farrakhan contacted the Kremlin and told them he needed a Soviet jet to collect him and transport him to Libya so that he could meet with Colonel Gaddafi to raise the alarm in person. The Soviets dis - believe it or not - fly Farrakhan to meet Gaddafi and his senior political counsel in Tripoli, and Farrakhan did warn them that Reagan was going to launch a massive strike against the Dictator, but it all turned out to be just a"damp squib ," a mere Farrakhan delusion. One last Farrakhan insanity is his staunch belief that the White (European) race was created 6,000 years ago on the Island of Patmos by a wicked scientist called "Yakub,""Yakub" is said to have used a type of genetic grafting technique to progressively turn Black Africans in Whites. These Whites, however were bad-asses, and immediately revolted and then began to brutally oppresses all Blacks. Farrakhan refers to them and the White race descended from them as "Blue-eyed Devils".



Bell's praises for Farrakhan automatically identify him as a radical, hateful, racist ratbag who was almost certainly unhinged. Bell was driven mad by his intense resentment and lust for revenge against White America and its traditional, Western, cultural institutions.



JACKSON AND CRT



In her speech to Michigan University Law School on MLK day in 2020, Jackson mention Bell, (whom along with his wife, a Critical Race Theorist) she praises throughout her speech, wrote a book in the early 1990's about the "persistence" of racism in American life. It's important to focus specifically on Jackson's interest in this book which was called Faces at the Bottom of the Well." The sub-title of the book is: "The Permanence of Racism."



"PERSISTENCE" and"PERMANENCE" are NOT the same thing. This is a typical example of Jackson's subtly distorting Bell and his book in order to make their extremism more moderate. Bell's uses this kind of nuanced sleight-of hand to camouflage not just her views on CRT but on all of the other key issues she was asked to state her position on during the Senate confirmation hearings. She is, like so many of the hard progressive left's political mouthpieces, a practiced exponent of a slick, misleading, disingenuous, evasive, slippery and deceitful sophistry.



Here is an example of Jackson's deceitfulness from her speech at Michigan University....



"my parents had the book ("Faces at the Bottom of the Well" on their coffee table for many years, and I remember staring at the image on the cover when I was growing up. I found it difficult to reconcile the image of the person, who seemed to be smiling, with the depressing that the title and subtitle converyed. I thought about this book cover again for the first time in 40 years when I started prepping for this speech."THAT WOULD HAVE MADE JACKSON 10 YEARS OLD.



That's interesting, because "Faces at the Bottom of the Well" was published in 1992 when Bell was a professor at Harvard Law. At that time Jackson was in her early 20's. It's unlikely that Biden's Supreme Court nominee grew up with this hateful text, but entirely plausible that she was influenced by the book which came out when she was at Harvard and the Harvard Law. Bell began a radical strike against Harvard before Jackson had completed he undergraduate degree. Therefore it's very unlikely that she had taken any of his classes, nonetheless, Bell was clearly a substantial influence on her. She is obviously backdating the books influence to her childhood to make it seem more innocent - because no one could blame a 10 year old for being attracted to a racist text..



"Faces at the Bottom of the Well" and the book "And We are not Saved" which came out before "Faces" have one basic message. This is that the Constitution (which Bell described as "roach powder") is nothing but the whim of a White agenda that serves its purposes. To the extent that the law has outlawed segregation and slavery, it did so only because it temporarily served White purposes and the moment it would serve White purposes to enslave Black people again, it would be done within the Constitution." THE CONSTITUTION IS JUST A FASCADE FOR A WHITE RACIST AGENDA.



This is the message that influenced Jackson. It is the paranoid racism of Derrick Bell, the Godfather of CRT, and IMO Jackson swallowed it all "hook, Line and Sinker during her formative years as an impressionable young Black woman at Harvard. Bell taught that White (European) people could never be trusted, and that all that mattered was POWER. For Bell the ultimate truths were RACE and POWER - everything else was a distraction. Hmmm, this world-view seems familiar to to me. Oh yes, how could I forget, it was the same weltanschaaung embraced by Herr Schicklegruber aka Adolph Hitler and his NAZI party (and you know how all of that ended up !).



JACKSON on the "1619 Project"



In her speech, Jackson also touts the "1619 PROJECT", praising this debunked, revisionist history and its author Nicole Hannah-Jones, a Black "New York Times" "journalist (hack) Hannah-Jones has written, Jackson says, a...



"provocative thesis that the America that was born in 1776 was not the perfect union that it is purported to be and that only Black Civil rights activism made America "the free nation that the Founders originally touted."



The "1619 PROJECT" was mass-circulated by the "New York Times"" and created a sensation. As a result this revisionist history was reviewed a many of America's most esteemed, erudite and authoritative professional historians. To put it bluntly they all said it was a total "crock of shite" -riddled with basic factual errors and raw historical anachronisms, one of which been that the Revolutionary War was fought to chiefly to defend the practice of slavery. This claim is "pure and utter bullshit" the real historians all said (though in more polite language like: "No... No... No, that's absolutely not true") Nevertheless Ms Nicole Hannah-Jones a bolshy Black ratbag who publicly refers to White Americans as: SCUM, DEVILS AND BLOODSUCKERS was rewarded for her efforts with a Pulitzer Prize (and still has it. This remined me of when the blood-drenched, Palestinian terrorist and psychopath, Yasar Arafat was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize; or when Obama was awarded one for...umm...being Black.



Jackson's remarks regarding the "1619 PROJECT" implicitly echo the CRT understanding that the Civil Rights struggle was not about upholding the Constitution, butovercoming it that America's Founding documents: "The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, were racist and remain the enemy.




In sum, we know for a fact that Jackson is a staunch CRT advocate/activist because she is currently a member of the Board of Trustee at a K-12 private school called Georgetown Day School. The school has an "anti-racist mission" (yet another euphemistic "fig leaf" for CRT and members of the Board are required to play an active role in developing the students curriculum and extra-curricular activities. A brief glance at the books and other learning resources and strategies at GDS, as well as communication from the Chair of the Board of Trustee (Jill Fairfax, who, incidentally gave an introductory speech on Jackson's behalf to the members Senate confirmation hearing) show that GDS is a veritable hot bed of CRT .




CRT (in any of its devious masks like: "anti-racism"; "Diversity, Inclusivity and Equity) (DIE) training/teaching is a radical, racist, divisive, Anti-American, neo-Marxist ideology/movement. It is hostile to the Founders notion of Natural Rights which are the foundation upon which the ""Declaration of Independence" and the Constitution were built. A nominee for the Supreme Court who is a known CRT ideologue must be ruled out immediately. A justice who hates the Constitution can hardly be expected to defend and uphold it as Supreme Court justice.



JUDGE JACKSON - IMMORAL ABORTION EXTREMIST




Judge Jackson , when asked by a Senator during the confirmation hearing: When does life begin ?", claimed she had no knowledge of when human life begins. That is almost certainly a LIE, because every high school biology student knows the answer. The answer is that human life begins at the moment of conception, that is the moment that a male sperm cell fertilizes a female ovum (egg cell). The entire Western scientific establishment accept this as an incontrovertible fact based on years of hard, objective empirical evidence. A new, unique human being is created at conception, this is no longer a debatable matter, it is a scientific "fact in the bag. Given that abortion is, - generally speaking -, a high-profile and contentious legal issue, and that Judge Jackson has previously in her career undertaken legal work while clerking for a former Supreme Court Justice (Stephen Breyer) which focused on a hotly controversial abortion issue, and that she presumably has enough intelligence to keep herself up to date with the fundament scientific facts that are of relevance to abortion (such as the simple fact - now established by the scientific community that human life begins at conception; I conclude that Jackson was lying, and, in truth, knew perfectly well when human life begins.




In 2007, the Supreme Court upheld a federal "Partial-Birth" abortion ban. It turns out that over 1999-2000, Judge Jackson worked to defend "Partial-Birth" abortions, while she was clerking for Justice Stephen Breyer. Jackson thoroughly researched the gruesome reality of the "Partial-Birth" abortion, yet still chose to vigourously defend it. "Partial-Birth" abortions are surreptitiously referred to as "Dilatation and Extraction or "D & X" abortions. The are horrifying for those who view them because it is so glaringly evident that a baby is being slaughtered.




A "Partial-Birth" abortion is typically performed late in the second trimester through to the third trimester, sometimes only weeks before full term; i.e. when the foetus is fully-formed and alive. In this procedure the mother's cervix is dilated and the baby is inverted by the abortionist so that it is in a breech birth position with its feet at the bottom of the womb and its head at the top. Next the abortionist inserts a metal clamping instrument (like a pair of pliers) and clamps on of the baby's feet. While the baby's foot is griped by the clamps, he then pulls out the baby's leg so that it is now outside the mother. He then clamps the baby's other foot and pulls out the other leg. Now he pulls on the legs to draw the whole of the baby's body out of the womb but not the head. So what you have now is all of the baby drawn outside of the womb with only the head remaining inside. The abortionist next takes a pair of surgical scissors and uses then to stab a hole in the back of the baby's skull near the neck. He stabs the skull until a hole is made large enough for a vacuum tube to be inserted. When the vacuum tube is pushed in through the hole in the the skull, the device is turned on and the baby's brains are sucked out through the tube. This soon kills the baby, and finally the dead child is "delivered."




Many Americans were disgusted and horrified by "Partial-Birth" abortions. Jackson was fully aware of the appalling and barbaric nature of "Partial Birth" abortions, yet she had no qualms at all working to defend their use; moreover she has continued to defend the brutalization and slaughter of the unborn for decades since. What kind of a human being does this? What kind of a person uses their specialized knowledge (as a lawyer) to defend the deliberate deadly mutilation and butchery of a 8 month foetus. I would say that only a person with no naturally functioning moral conscience could do this. Only a person bereft of normal human compassion and empathy. In other words, a psychopath. That's the only fitting word as far as I am concerned. Think about it could YOY perform a "Partial -Delivery abortion on a late term baby ? Don't you think that someone who intentionally worked to keep this type of abortion legal is in some ways more of a monster than the individual abortionists who carry it out. I sure do. I have done plenty of bad things in my life, but I have never calmly sat down and organized a rational defense for an atrocity like PARTIAL ABORTION - that is an act of evil. Period.



In sum, the Supreme Court could well do without a psychopathic justice on its bench. Jackson record on the issue of extreme abortion is another reason why she should never be confirmed as a Justice.




What gets me is that the Senate confirmation hearings exposed more than enough of Jackson's radical CRT history (neo-Marxist racist ideology anti-American sentiment and anti-Constitutional stance - not to mention her LYING and duplicity to demonstrate that she ought absolutely not be confirmed as a Supreme Court justice.BUT IT IS ALMOST CERTAIN THAT SHE WILL BE, BECAUSE SHE "HAS THE NUMBERS" All I can say is that something is very wrong with the system. The radical left's "dirty money" organizations like "Democracy Alliance", among others, who backed Jackson's nomination are one big part of the problem, there needs to be a root and branch restructure of the current 5 (c) (3) and 5 (c) (4) IRS regulations. That would be a start.




Dachshund



DLM....Dachshund Live MATTER !
 
Last edited:
Now what do you think the source is; Brietfart? InfoWars? Cato? Blaze? WTF? Gateway? OAN? Daily Caller? TownHall? Newsmax? Gateway? Federalist? NYP? Judicial Review? RT? Pat Dollard? or some obscure right wing blogger posting from his mother’s basement?
 
Now what do you think the source is; Brietfart? InfoWars? Cato? Blaze? WTF? Gateway? OAN? Daily Caller? TownHall? Newsmax? Gateway? Federalist? NYP? Judicial Review? RT? Pat Dollard? or some obscure right wing blogger posting from his mother’s basement?

I'll bite, the Cato Institute? Are you ignorant to what they stand for or just doing your own version of trolling?
 
It’s awesome that the racist right is losing it over this amazing woman



They must Know that even their right wing plants on the SOTUS will end up being convinced By her brilliance and logic


A cult flipping deprogrammer will be on the court


Sweet
 
https://www.cato.org/policy-report/may/june-2020/guide-austrian-economics


A Guide to Austrian Economics
New book and video series
MAY/​JUNE 2020 • POLICY REPORT
SHARE





The ideas of the Austrian school of economics have long informed the principles of the broader libertarian movement. Since its origin in the work of economist Carl Menger in the 1870s, Austrian economics has revolutionized the study of economics and perhaps achieved its greatest recognition when F. A. Hayek received the Nobel Prize. At the same time, the relationship between the Austrian and other schools of economic thought has sometimes been strained.








Look at them GUSH over the Austrian school of economics



The one school of economics that tries to do economics WITHOUT MATH!



They are idiots or scum
 
Mainstream economists generally reject modern-day Austrian economics, and argue that modern-day Austrian economists are excessively averse to the use of mathematics and statistics in economics.[79] Austrian opposition to mathematization extends to economic theorizing only, as they argue that human behavior is too variable for overarching mathematical models to hold true across time and context. Austrians do, however, support analyzing revealed preference via mathematization to aid business and finance.[80]

Economist Paul Krugman has stated that they are unaware of holes in their own thinking because Austrians do not use "explicit models".[81]

Economist Benjamin Klein has criticized the economic methodological work of Austrian economist Israel M. Kirzner. While praising Kirzner for highlighting shortcomings in traditional methodology, Klein argued that Kirzner did not provide a viable alternative for economic methodology.[82] Economist Tyler Cowen has written that Kirzner's theory of entrepreneurship can ultimately be reduced to a neoclassical search model and is thus not in the radical subjectivist tradition of Austrian praxeology. Cowen states that Kirzner's entrepreneurs can be modeled in mainstream terms of search.[83]
 
They try to do economics WITHOUT USING MATH!



Why would an economist refuse to use math?


Because math always proves them fucking wrong




CATO is rich man propaganda to make fools out of people like cawacko
 
I'll bite, the Cato Institute? Are you ignorant to what they stand for or just doing your own version of trolling?

For YEARS I have been handing you these cold hard facts about CATO


Why you do you pretend you were never told these Facts?



Russo bot hole
 
For YEARS I have been handing you these cold hard facts about CATO


Why you do you pretend you were never told these Facts?



Russo bot hole

My OP was not about economic theory, you cretin ! What's wrong with you; why did you post 7 consecttive post on irrelevant bullshit like the "Austrian School" which has zero to do with the issue I put on the table for debate ? Is it Schizophrenia or some other kind of psychosis that targets box-biters (lesbians) ?



Dachshund



DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !
 
Do we really need something as ugly as the ketybird on our SC. ?? She looks like a martian mutant. Even uglier than lori lizard or Big Mike.
 
:rolleyes:

'Horrifying' scandal?

Only a MASSIVE wimp whose idea of 'danger' is masturbating with the lights on ordering pizza with 'light' hot peppers would call whatever the fuck it is you are spewing forth as 'horrifying'.

Unless this woman stands on the steps of the SCOTUS and blows her brains out on TV?
Nothing about this entire nonsense will EVER be 'horrifying'.
 
Do we really need something as ugly as the ketybird on our SC. ?? She looks like a martian mutant. Even uglier than lori lizard or Big Mike.

So...your criteria for the SCOTUS is how physically attractive they are?

Every time I think you could not possibly be any more ridiculous and pathetic...you prove me wrong.

You are one pathetic 'black' man/woman.
 
My OP was not about economic theory, you cretin ! What's wrong with you; why did you post 7 consecttive post on irrelevant bullshit like the "Austrian School" which has zero to do with the issue I put on the table for debate ? Is it Schizophrenia or some other kind of psychosis that targets box-biters (lesbians) ?



Dachshund



DLM....Dachshund Lives Matter !

She's a cretin and seriously retarded.
 
She sexually molestered me 34 years ago at a party! I was off in a side room resting and next thing i knew, she was there slurpin' mah gherkin and I couldn't get away!

I didn't even know her, but I'd never forget that face! :eek:

Believe the mens!

PS: She swallered and left. :laugh:

I feel so used...
 
Back
Top