The GOP’s putrid case against the debates commission

B

BidenPresident

Verified User
A central argument relates to the debates commission’s decision to name Steve Scully, then of C-SPAN, to moderate a debate in the 2020 presidential campaign between then-President Donald Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden. The GOP’s gripe is that Scully had “worked for” Biden when he was a senator.

Technically, yes; practically, not even close. As a 17-year-old freshman at American University, Scully took a course on Congress and the presidency that included an assignment to a congressional office. A native of Erie, Pa., Scully was a logical candidate to work in the office of Sen. John Heinz, a Republican, but he was told there was no availability. So the school found him a spot in Biden’s office, where he worked quarter-time for six weeks in the mailroom of the senator from Delaware. “I literally opened up the mail, read it, sorted it and put it in different bins,” recalls Scully. “I never even got a picture with the guy.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/04/16/gop-debate-commission-mcdaniel/
 
It is no argument. it is an excuse. They get their asses kicked in every debate. They have been fighting the fact they do not have total control. They will have a debate on Fox that features just Repubs and they will pretend they are debating a Dem.
This is just another lego block in the construction of a totally controlled media.
 
Nordberg said:
It is no argument. it is an excuse. They get their asses kicked in every debate. They have been fighting the fact they do not have total control. They will have a debate on Fox that features just Repubs and they will pretend they are debating a Dem.
This is just another lego block in the construction of a totally controlled media.
Click to expand...

Seems like they are admitting they're going to run Trump again.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I don't really see the problem with conservatives telling lib'ruls they can no longer set a unilateral agenda.....
Click to expand...

Nope, it's better that YOU set the agenda, right my friend. Cops murdering black people in cold blood? Fine with you. Women being attacked in TX and ID for wanting abortions? You're just fine with that.

Seriously, what happened to you?
 
LurchAddams said:
Nope, it's better that YOU set the agenda, right my friend. Cops murdering black people in cold blood? Fine with you. Women being attacked in TX and ID for wanting abortions? You're just fine with that.

Seriously, what happened to you?
Click to expand...

I seriously doubt that the debate participants will be required to either murder black people or abort children, but the mere fact you felt compelled to bring it up PROVES you cunts should not be required to actually negotiate a fair and balanced debate process........by the way I am putting you on ignore with the rest of the amazonerd socks....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I seriously doubt that the debate participants will be required to either murder black people or abort children, but the mere fact you felt compelled to bring it up PROVES you cunts should not be required to actually negotiate a fair and balanced debate process........by the way I am putting you on ignore with the rest of the amazonerd socks....
Click to expand...

Well, I guess I'll spend the rest of my morning crying into my Starbucks dragonfruit refresher. With you putting me on ignore, what shall I do :)
 
All Presidential debates should be finished BEFORE early voting starts. The DNC should pick a moderator and the RNC should pick a moderator then they should alternate the questions. Both candidates would have to answer every question.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top