Trump is an idiot. this isn't about a person - this is about fixing a broken process
That is wrong, Presidential debates were never a proven controversy before the era of Trump
Trump is an idiot. this isn't about a person - this is about fixing a broken process
That is wrong, Presidential debates were never a proven controversy before the era of Trump
I listed two specific problems - that a majority of reasonable person would agree with
1 - informed voting is preferred over uninformed voting. So having debates prior to allowing people to vote is preferred
2 - eliminating bias from the debate would be ideal. I am open to suggestions on how this can be done
And I showed how your two problems are a load of horseshit, intended to deflect attention away from your myriad policy failures.
I will start adding you to my ban list if you can't stay on topic
but when it comes to voting for Supreme Court Justices, those debates can occur after 50M people had already voted.
You're the one who brought up election integrity!
So if you care about it so much, how come on 1/6 your stupid ass was shitposting here on JPP?
Probably because it's all bullshit and you don't believe a single word of it yourself.
What a fucking poseur.
It not just that the questions tend to be poor quality now, it is that the candidates barely attempt to answer the questions, they immediately go into the talking points they intended to hit when they walked in the door. This wont fix that, but still it is a good move, the previous show runners have thoroughly discredited themselves.
And they are not remotely debates, they need to be renamed.
Trump bombed in all debates he was in, and the last thing they want is a repeat performance by him or a Trump-lite candidate, especially since they don't want to run on policy but rather innuendo
And prepared candidate already has a pretty good idea of what areas the questions are going to be centered upon, if nothing else, have their talking points ready to bail if it is too tough
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rnc-withdraws-commission-presidential-debates-mcdaniel-trump
the biggest flaw in debates is none happen before states open up for early voting.
the second biggest flaw - is they are too biased - to the point we even know the moderators are lettings their preferred candidate know about the questions before they are asked
that is not true. they have been controversial many times in history.
the moderators just play up the talking points. it has gotten to be absurd -
Best way to start is the total elimination of early voting.
no sane person likes how the debates are ran.
For D's......because the Mind Molders (nee journalists) are generally hostile towards R's for the R's it is somewhat different. Absurd yes, I sometimes still watch but less and less, and it has probably been 20 years since the "debates" mattered to me. It has become a sort of political performance art.
that is not true. they have been controversial many times in history.
Best way to start is the total elimination of early voting.
millions vote before the candidates even debate
You did not even discuss this.
So let me get this straight...when it comes to elections, all debates have to occur before early voting, but when it comes to voting for Supreme Court Justices, those debates can occur after 50M people had already voted.