The GOP Endorses a PIG!

leaningright said:
Serious question here. Admittedly, I haven’t followed the news much lately nor have I been on this board much lately, so if I say something inaccurate of my assessment of this please let me know. We are visiting my in laws and they watched the news this evening and so I watched it as well. ABC nightly... Anyway, I saw Trumps response to the reporter’s question concerning Roy Moore. I began thinking then, and continue to after reading this far on this thread, that

I would have responded with something like: “Mr. Moore denies the allegations. We don’t need a Liberal Democrat in that seat (Trump’s words and I don’t mind them). I am willing to let this election play out and if Mr. Moore wins, and then the allegations turn out to be true, then I would wholeheartedly support his removal and whatever steps need to be taken.”

The question, what would be wrong with such a response?
Click to expand...

Really flaccid and very disappointing

Did you "wait" for any allegations against Sec State Clinton be "proven" before you leaped to the assumption that she was a basically a criminal?
 
leaningright said:
Serious question here. Admittedly, I haven’t followed the news much lately nor have I been on this board much lately, so if I say something inaccurate of my assessment of this please let me know. We are visiting my in laws and they watched the news this evening and so I watched it as well. ABC nightly... Anyway, I saw Trumps response to the reporter’s question concerning Roy Moore. I began thinking then, and continue to after reading this far on this thread, that I would have responded with something like: “Mr. Moore denies the allegations. We don’t need a Liberal Democrat in that seat (Trump’s words and I don’t mind them). I am willing to let this election play out and if Mr. Moore wins, and then the allegations turn out to be true, then I would wholeheartedly support his removal and whatever steps need to be taken.”

The question, what would be wrong with such a response?
Click to expand...

Good to see you LR! There's the court of law and then there's political reality. One is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The same doesn't apply in politics and there are a number of credible allegations against him. His actions were not ok and he should not be running.

I was hoping to see on the board because I wanted to get your opinion on this. Some evangelicals in Alabama have used the example of Joseph and Mary in the bible to justify Moore's actions. What do you think of that?
 
Covfefe said:
They focused on Nelson, and disregarded all the others, why is that?
Click to expand...
Because Nelson presented the ONLY physical evidence to back up her accusation....the others have NO evidence at all....

If you make the claim the moon is made out of cheese am I required to proof to you is isn't ?
You make the claim, you present the proof, otherwise, its bullshit.
 
DEMOCRAT domer76 said:
Poor little mosquito. "Is Vietnam "in America"? Was the Vietnam war an "emergency in America"?"
Click to expand...

DEMOCRAT domer76 said:
That's why you remain confused about whether Vietnam is in America.
Click to expand...

DEMOCRAT domer76 said:
GBA asks: "Is Vietnam IN America?" A classic!
Click to expand...

DEMOCRAT domer76 said:
“Is Vietnam IN America?” Priceless! I’m still chuckling at that massively ignorant question! You are truly the gift that gives in giving!
Click to expand...

DEMOCRAT domer76 said:
Poor little illiterate fuckwad. No wonder you pose questions such as "Is Vietnam in America?"
Click to expand...

Poor DEMOCRAT.

You responded to a person who asked what the people of Puerto Rico had sent to contribute to emergencies in the USA with "Americans, bitch".

TheDonald said:
What does Puerto Rico send or contribute to emergencies in the USA
Click to expand...

DEMOCRAT domer76 said:
Americans, bitch.
Click to expand...

Then I asked:

God bless America said:
Puerto Rico sends or contributes "Americans" to emergencies in the USA?
Click to expand...

You replied "48,000 served in Vietnam".

DEMOCRAT domer76 said:
They ARE Americans, bitch. 48,000 served in Vietnam. Was that "emergency" enough for you, bitch?
Click to expand...

So I asked:

God bless America said:
Now you're claiming that Vietnam is an emergency in the USA?
Click to expand...

DEMOCRAT domer76 said:
Gonna quibble about tense, aren't you, bitch?
Click to expand...

Ever since, you're been pretending that I said Vietnam is in the USA. In reality, you said Puerto Ricans sending Americans to Vietnam was contributing to emergencies in the USA.
 
leaningright said:
Serious question here. Admittedly, I haven’t followed the news much lately nor have I been on this board much lately, so if I say something inaccurate of my assessment of this please let me know. We are visiting my in laws and they watched the news this evening and so I watched it as well. ABC nightly... Anyway, I saw Trumps response to the reporter’s question concerning Roy Moore. I began thinking then, and continue to after reading this far on this thread, that I would have responded with something like: “Mr. Moore denies the allegations. We don’t need a Liberal Democrat in that seat (Trump’s words and I don’t mind them). I am willing to let this election play out and if Mr. Moore wins, and then the allegations turn out to be true, then I would wholeheartedly support his removal and whatever steps need to be taken.”

The question, what would be wrong with such a response?
Click to expand...
Trump did say "Moores denies the allegations"...and "we don't need a liberal democrat in that seat"....

Other republicans have said "its up the people in Alabama ".....and the majority leader did threaten to remove him if possible....

So that covers just everything you said....
 
cawacko said:
Good to see you LR! There's the court of law and then there's political reality. One is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The same doesn't apply in politics and there are a number of credible allegations against him. His actions were not ok and he should not be running.

I was hoping to see on the board because I wanted to get your opinion on this. Some evangelicals in Alabama have used the example of Joseph and Mary in the bible to justify Moore's actions. What do you think of that?
Click to expand...

If he’s guilty then it’s absolutely ludicrous to try to use anything from the Bible to support his actions. Nothing there could support what he is accused of.

Then the problem I see with the political reality is that anyone can come forward and do a “hatchet job” on any candidate they oppose with both credible and non credible accusations. So close to an election and with rules that prevent the naming of another candidate... The same thing was done to Bill Clinton I think. It didn’t work but it was done. All that said, I would not vote for Mr. Moore right now.
 
Cypress said:
Really flaccid and very disappointing

Did you "wait" for any allegations against Sec State Clinton be "proven" before you leaped to the assumption that she was a basically a criminal?
Click to expand...
All you had to do was listen to Comey sworn testimony....Hillary IS a criminal....
 
Thing1 said:
The GOP will never have or be able to claim the moral high ground again.

Cool.
Click to expand...

They never had one and it never stopped them before. They stand for one thing. They are the white people party. Everything g else is commentary and details.
 
Cypress said:
Really flaccid and very disappointing

Did you "wait" for any allegations against Sec State Clinton be "proven" before you leaped to the assumption that she was a basically a criminal?
Click to expand...

I have never assumed that Mrs. Clinton was a criminal. I really do not care. I just would not vote for her ... ever.

I did point out to my very conservative friends and relatives that when they were accusing Bill Clinton back in the day...allegations are allegations.
 
leaningright said:
If he’s guilty then it’s absolutely ludicrous to try to use anything from the Bible to support his actions. Nothing there could support what he is accused of.

Then the problem I see with the political reality is that anyone can come forward and do a “hatchet job” on any candidate they oppose with both credible and non credible accusations. So close to an election and with rules that prevent the naming of another candidate... The same thing was done to Bill Clinton I think. It didn’t work but it was done. All that said, I would not vote for Mr. Moore right now.
Click to expand...
One allegation sure don't seem too credible if Moores lawyers were telling the truth today....

But Democrats are masters of character assassination with allegations alone....ask Neut Gingrich and Clarence Thomas, they know first hand...
 
leaningright said:
I have never assumed that Mrs. Clinton was a criminal. I really do not care. I just would not vote for her ... ever.

I did point out to my very conservative friends and relatives that when they were accusing Bill Clinton back in the day...allegations are allegations.
Click to expand...
The 'blue dress and DNA" proved Bill was lying under oath, perjury.....and his statement about what the meaning of is is....should have
shaken everyone's doubt about his testimony....
 
Covfefe said:
They focused on Nelson, and disregarded all the others, why is that?
Click to expand...

Because there are only two serious accusations. This is one of them. Now that she has been shown to be a fucking liar we are left with one.

The others are just him asking 17 year olds out for dates. Not illegal. Not even immoral. Just you trying to score political points on something you aren’t really opposed to
 
leaningright said:
Serious question here. Admittedly, I haven’t followed the news much lately nor have I been on this board much lately, so if I say something inaccurate of my assessment of this please let me know. We are visiting my in laws and they watched the news this evening and so I watched it as well. ABC nightly... Anyway, I saw Trumps response to the reporter’s question concerning Roy Moore. I began thinking then, and continue to after reading this far on this thread, that I would have responded with something like: “Mr. Moore denies the allegations. We don’t need a Liberal Democrat in that seat (Trump’s words and I don’t mind them). I am willing to let this election play out and if Mr. Moore wins, and then the allegations turn out to be true, then I would wholeheartedly support his removal and whatever steps need to be taken.”

The question, what would be wrong with such a response?
Click to expand...

Absolutely nothing unless you are a liberal retard. Hence the OP. Do you really think JPP lefties will ever give Trump the benefit of the doubt on anything?
 
NOVA said:
Because Nelson presented the ONLY physical evidence to back up her accusation....the others have NO evidence at all....

If you make the claim the moon is made out of cheese am I required to proof to you is isn't ?
You make the claim, you present the proof, otherwise, its bullshit.
Click to expand...
Sorry, that’s a lame excuse, they didn’t even mention those women had no proof or questioned their stories. Just tells me they are worried about Nelson.
 
Cypress said:
If you are a Trump voter, or just someone who routinely runs cover for Trump on political message boards, this is a very poor reflection on you.

From what I can tell, virtually ever liberal on this forum as put Al Franken, Charlie Rose, and Harvey Weinstein on blast.
Click to expand...
They confessed and there was photographic proof of filthy Franken....what the hell else could liberals do....

CNN did say he shouldn't' resign because he apologized.....how about you, do you agree ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top