The Gay Agenda On Display

So the only people who should raise children are those without any perversions? And who gets to name the perversions? You? Maybe only those who have sex solely for procreation should be allowed to raise children?

Or better yet, those who are celibate? Like maybe a priest? Oh yeah, that doesn't work out so well either, huh?

A normal healthy family unit with a male and a female.
 
Oh bullshit with the "persecution". Homos have a higher rate of drug addiction, alcoholism, mental illness, suicide, and I also forgot to mention STDs. Nothing to do with "persecution". You guys have been using and hiding behind that excuse for years. They are confused disturbed people. They need help, not the responsibility of raising innocent children. Morons.

Yeah, just because they have been beaten up, refused jobs, and called all sorts of vile names, why would that have any effect on them???

Plenty of studies have shown abused children suffer much higher rates of drug addiction, alcoholism, mental illness and suicide. In fact, I would bet it was probably close to the same rate as homosexuals.


If you want to refuse to allow homosexuals who are drug addicts, alcoholics, and mentally ill to adopt then go ahead. But you apparently think all gays fit that bill. Which shows your own ignorance.

And while we are at it, I think we should not allow straights who are drug addicts, alcoholics, and mentally ill to adopt either. Never can tell what would happen. The kid they raise might turn gay.
 
Mental masturbater. Who is they? Nobody has ever told me what to say. Do they tell you what to say? Byrd died, recanted. Will you?

You toe the party line all day every day. You're nothing but a useful idiot. You've sold your soul to your massa and you come cheap.
 
Hey, Poet, are those two related to you other than being black and queer? Probably liberals too.
Well, of course. Don't you know that all blacks are related to each other, though they came from different families, tribes, parts of the world? Are you related to David Duke and Hitler? Probably, you being a Nazi, and all.
 
A normal healthy family unit with a male and a female.

Would that include husbands who beat their wives or abuse their kids? Would that include families where one or both of the parents is an addict or an alcoholic?
 
Wow - what an utterly humiliating thread for you, Alias.

You're less than human. Try for some remorse, and change your thinking.
 
Yeah, just because they have been beaten up, refused jobs, and called all sorts of vile names, why would that have any effect on them???

Plenty of studies have shown abused children suffer much higher rates of drug addiction, alcoholism, mental illness and suicide. In fact, I would bet it was probably close to the same rate as homosexuals.


If you want to refuse to allow homosexuals who are drug addicts, alcoholics, and mentally ill to adopt then go ahead. But you apparently think all gays fit that bill. Which shows your own ignorance.

And while we are at it, I think we should not allow straights who are drug addicts, alcoholics, and mentally ill to adopt either. Never can tell what would happen. The kid they raise might turn gay.

A lot of abused children grow up to become homosexuals. Homosexuality is an outward symptom of a deeper problem. No thinking person is falling for that persecution crap. Go peddle that crap somewhere else. Homosexuals are sick people.
 
Well, of course. Don't you know that all blacks are related to each other, though they came from different families, tribes, parts of the world? Are you related to David Duke and Hitler? Probably, you being a Nazi, and all.

I thought I'd ask you since you're an expert on race and homosexuality.
 
A lot of abused children grow up to become homosexuals. Homosexuality is an outward symptom of a deeper problem. No thinking person is falling for that persecution crap. Go peddle that crap somewhere else. Homosexuals are sick people.

You keep referring to "thinking persons". Who might that be? You?

If all this is so obvious, how about some study or evidence to back your claim? So far all I see is the ranting of a homophobic hater. No more the truth than the bile spewed by racists or the anti-semitic hate mongers out there.
 
Would that include husbands who beat their wives or abuse their kids? Would that include families where one or both of the parents is an addict or an alcoholic?

Well, Duh!! What do you think? Are you really that stupid? Of course not. Why dont' you toss up a few more straw men and please get more emotional about the thing. We need more drama to make your point.
 
A lot of abused children grow up to become homosexuals. Homosexuality is an outward symptom of a deeper problem. No thinking person is falling for that persecution crap. Go peddle that crap somewhere else. Homosexuals are sick people.

And a lot of kids from well balanced, normal families with a mother and a father turn out to be homosexuals. But that wouldn't help your agenda, would it?
 
You keep referring to "thinking persons". Who might that be? You?

If all this is so obvious, how about some study or evidence to back your claim? So far all I see is the ranting of a homophobic hater. No more the truth than the bile spewed by racists or the anti-semitic hate mongers out there.

You acknowledged that homos have high rates of alcoholism, drug addiction etc, and you blamed it on persecution. Now you want me to prove what you've alreadly acknowledged. Are you confused?
 
Well, Duh!! What do you think? Are you really that stupid? Of course not. Why dont' you toss up a few more straw men and please get more emotional about the thing. We need more drama to make your point.

I am just pointing out the flaws in your argument. You want to make sure no gays adopt because some of them are addicts. But when it comes to straights you want them judged solely for what they are or have done.

This is called bigotry and hypocrisy.
 
You acknowledged that homos have high rates of alcoholism, drug addiction etc, and you blamed it on persecution. Now you want me to prove what you've alreadly acknowledged. Are you confused?

YOu have made numerous claims, and yet have offered no evidence that all gays are unfit parents.
 
I am just pointing out the flaws in your argument. You want to make sure no gays adopt because some of them are addicts. But when it comes to straights you want them judged solely for what they are or have done.

This is called bigotry and hypocrisy.

"Flaws in my argument"? Straw men and emotional rhetoric are not flaws in my argument. They are weak and pitiful attempts at manipulation to your point of view. Try again.
 
"Flaws in my argument"? Straw men and emotional rhetoric are not flaws in my argument. They are weak and pitiful attempts at manipulation to your point of view. Try again.

You entire argument has been your own hatred, nothing more. You keep throwing in the "any thinking person" while spewing nonsense that any thinking person would laugh at.

You make the claim that no child should be raised by gays because some gays have substance abuse issues and mental illnesses. That is utter bullshit.

Your diagnosis of homosexuality as people who are confused and living a lie goes against every legitimate study known, and yet you want to base adoption laws on it.

You dismiss my claims that the abuses of society (your own attitude reflects it nicely btw) have caused many of the issues suffered by the minority of gays, and yet your own post reeks of the same abuse.



In short, this entire thread is nothing more than your own personal hatred (or fear) of homosexuality, without a shred of scientific evidence to back it up.
 
I don't need evidence that gays are unfit parents. All I need is a consensus.

Luckily for the world, a consensus of your kind of thinking is getting rarer and rarer. Every time a major poll is taken acceptance of homosexuality is higher.


But its nice that you admit you don't need evidence. And nice to see you have no problem with mob rule doing harm to people, as long as its not you. How noble of you.
 
Back
Top