The future climate - the planet is giving us a glimpse

So, according to you ALL mining operations have been either replaced by robots or will be shortly? Hmmm, better get on the phone and tell Senator Manchin about this! And since your obviously a videot (young person who knows nothing beyond their birthday and relies solely on TV for all information), you must not know that PREDICTIONS of COMPLETE AUTOMATION of all industries in American have been going on since the early 1970's and beyond. Yes, there is progress and many jobs have been replaced with technology...and it doesn't change the FACT regarding pollution levels from production of raw materials and waste disposal crimes. God, you're such a proud ignoramus!

All your insipidly stubborn repetition and babbling STILL hasn't disproved, refuted or diminished the info in the links and my subsequent references. Carry on, my little willfully ignorant troll.

Take note ProudLefty, the above IS gaslighting--and an ad hominem. Automation in industry has been increasing steadily. It won't replace the workforce entirely for the foreseeable future either. Electronics have also supplemented even manually operated machinery in many fields.

High-accuracy-3-axis-drill-lathe-milling-machine-digital-readout-DRO-and-3-pieces-linear-scales.jpg


Adding a DRO kit to a mill or lathe allows manually operated machines to increase their accuracy and repeatability on making parts.

Up to about 1980, this was the most common database storage system for most corporations:

bb181660-dd3e-4071-b2e4-c72e66bcd778.276659688c9d9ad531476830d1f3c541.jpeg


That is no longer true, databases are becoming entirely electronic and stored on computer hard drives, etc.

In the near future--within a couple of decades at most--driverless vehicles will become pretty commonplace. In mining, since you mention that, the dump trucks will need no driver. There are already a considerable number of robotic construction machines. Some still have a human supervising the machine, just in case, but they operate on their own virtually the entire time.

https://asirobots.com/mining/dozer/
https://www.constructiondive.com/news/komatsu-to-unveil-semi-autonomous-bulldozers/571751/

So, yes, a lot of mining operations will become close to totally robotic in the coming decades.
 
Take note ProudLefty, the above IS gaslighting--and an ad hominem. Automation in industry has been increasing steadily. It won't replace the workforce entirely for the foreseeable future either. Electronics have also supplemented even manually operated machinery in many fields.

High-accuracy-3-axis-drill-lathe-milling-machine-digital-readout-DRO-and-3-pieces-linear-scales.jpg


Adding a DRO kit to a mill or lathe allows manually operated machines to increase their accuracy and repeatability on making parts.

Up to about 1980, this was the most common database storage system for most corporations:

bb181660-dd3e-4071-b2e4-c72e66bcd778.276659688c9d9ad531476830d1f3c541.jpeg


That is no longer true, databases are becoming entirely electronic and stored on computer hard drives, etc.

In the near future--within a couple of decades at most--driverless vehicles will become pretty commonplace. In mining, since you mention that, the dump trucks will need no driver. There are already a considerable number of robotic construction machines. Some still have a human supervising the machine, just in case, but they operate on their own virtually the entire time.

https://asirobots.com/mining/dozer/
https://www.constructiondive.com/news/komatsu-to-unveil-semi-autonomous-bulldozers/571751/

So, yes, a lot of mining operations will become close to totally robotic in the coming decades.

So basically you're saying we're heading to a socialist utopia?
 
Take note ProudLefty, the above IS gaslighting--and an ad hominem. Automation in industry has been increasing steadily. It won't replace the workforce entirely for the foreseeable future either. Electronics have also supplemented even manually operated machinery in many fields.

High-accuracy-3-axis-drill-lathe-milling-machine-digital-readout-DRO-and-3-pieces-linear-scales.jpg


Adding a DRO kit to a mill or lathe allows manually operated machines to increase their accuracy and repeatability on making parts.

Up to about 1980, this was the most common database storage system for most corporations:

bb181660-dd3e-4071-b2e4-c72e66bcd778.276659688c9d9ad531476830d1f3c541.jpeg


That is no longer true, databases are becoming entirely electronic and stored on computer hard drives, etc.

In the near future--within a couple of decades at most--driverless vehicles will become pretty commonplace. In mining, since you mention that, the dump trucks will need no driver. There are already a considerable number of robotic construction machines. Some still have a human supervising the machine, just in case, but they operate on their own virtually the entire time.

https://asirobots.com/mining/dozer/
https://www.constructiondive.com/news/komatsu-to-unveil-semi-autonomous-bulldozers/571751/

So, yes, a lot of mining operations will become close to totally robotic in the coming decades.

:palm: Dear Readers, check out Posts #152 & #155 on this thread. TA Gardner is so intent on the gain saying of anything or any position I post that he develops a sort of myopia in his discussion.

I'll dumb it down further for him: I never denied the fact of automation and it's electronic/digital off springs (relatively)rapidly replacing the mechanical (i.e., the typing pool, manual typewriters, paper file draws). What I did DOCUMENT was the FACT that all this switch over STILL DEPENDS UPON INDUSTRIAL TECHNIQUES BORN OF THE INDUSTRIAL AGE TO OBTAIN THE RAW MATERIALS TO CREATE THE ELECTRONIC AGE. Human workers may be replaced by robots decades from now, but the environmental and ecological damage will be the same.

Add to this that all these electronic wonders are STILL being powered by industrial power plants, and that does not bode well for our environment (i.e., air pollution).

Add to this the FACT that used and out-dated electronics are NOT being recycled 100%, as there is economic incentive just to dump these items in another country with lax (or non-existent) waste disposal laws. That does NOT bode well for the human population.

Add to this "conservative" resistance to environmental changes to their business (Power company's bogus campaign against solar and wind power), and the seal clapping about SCOTUS pulling the EPA's teeth, and the "electronic age".

Add all these together and all the advantages of the electronic age products are not bringing ecological and environmental positive changes with them as fast. A matter of history, a matter of fact.
 
Last edited:
Yet you describe a system that is creating energy out of nothing. Paradox. Which is it, dude???

Correct. In any closed system, no energy sources or sinks may be considered from outside that system.

No. An open system is simply the Universe itself. You still cannot create energy out of nothing.

It is a closed system to both, if that is indeed your chosen system.

More bullshit, you're full of it.
 
Yes it is.

You can't clear your paradox by denying it, dude. You MUST choose one and only one of the conflicting arguments and never use the other again. That is the ONLY way to clear a paradox.

Refraction is not reflection. Reemission is a buzzword. It doesn't exist. When a photon is absorbed, it is DESTROYED.

You cannot trap heat. You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas either. Heat has no temperature. CO2 is not a thermal insulator.

Of course you disagree. You have already demonstrated you are discarding the 2nd law of thermodynamics. You can't accept this law and ignore it at the same time, dude.

Parts of the Earth absorb radiation and emit it back to the sky. CO2 absorbs radiation and emits it in any direction. The heat exchange between the two in the atmosphere, results in a higher atmospheric temperature than if the heat exchange were not present.
 
Last edited:
That's all he can speak for, though he often tries to speak for everyone.

This is your belief, is it?

Yeah, based on the last 20 glaciations that have occurred since the Earth developed polar ice caps 2 million years ago, ... the relative shortness of the interglacial periods, ... and the Milankovitch cycles. It is the most sound prediction based on the best evidence we have, IMO.
 
Last edited:
Earth is going to be unlivable soon enough--no longer much doubt about that--but we won't last quite long enough to see it.

Urge the young people to not procreate, and that's about all we can do at this point.

Today's newborn babies have a holocaust in front of them. Abortion is a blessing to them.
 
Earth is going to be unlivable soon enough--no longer much doubt about that--but we won't last quite long enough to see it.

Urge the young people to not procreate, and that's about all we can do at this point.

Today's newborn babies have a holocaust in front of them. Abortion is a blessing to them.

Look on the bright side Debbie Downer, we still have disease, starvation and war. :dunno:

Or was your comment based on your belief in eugenics and humane euthanasia?
 
So, according to you ALL mining operations have been either replaced by robots or will be shortly?
Word stuffing. He never said any such thing.
Hmmm, better get on the phone and tell Senator Manchin about this! And since your obviously a videot (young person who knows nothing beyond their birthday and relies solely on TV for all information),
LIF. You are describing yourself again.
you must not know that PREDICTIONS of COMPLETE AUTOMATION of all industries in American have been going on since the early 1970's and beyond.
Many have already occurred.
Yes, there is progress and many jobs have been replaced with technology.
No. Jobs have CHANGED because of technology, they weren't eliminated. Indeed, technology has brought MORE jobs and better paying jobs.
..and it doesn't change the FACT regarding pollution levels from production of raw materials
Learn what 'fact' means. It is not a worship word. It is not a proof. It is not a Universal Truth.
Production of raw materials is not pollution.
and waste disposal crimes.
If someone is committing a crime disposing of waste, it's already a crime. So?
God, you're such a proud ignoramus!
Insults get you nowhere.
All your insipidly stubborn repetition and babbling
LIF. You are describing yourself again.
STILL hasn't disproved, refuted or diminished the info in the links and my subsequent references.
Special pleading fallacy. False authority fallacy. 'Fact' worship.
Carry on, my little willfully ignorant troll.
Buzzword fallacies.
 
Take note ProudLefty,
He doesn't take notes. He just trolls.
the above IS gaslighting--and an ad hominem.
Correct.
Automation in industry has been increasing steadily.
Indeed. Much has already been automated.
It won't replace the workforce entirely for the foreseeable future either.
It actually just changes the jobs, making them better paying jobs, and even creating jobs that never existed before. People have to design and build these machines (also automated), install them, maintain them, operate them (such as overseeing mining or processing operations), fix them when they break down, and program them.
Electronics have also supplemented even manually operated machinery in many fields.
High-accuracy-3-axis-drill-lathe-milling-machine-digital-readout-DRO-and-3-pieces-linear-scales.jpg


Adding a DRO kit to a mill or lathe allows manually operated machines to increase their accuracy and repeatability on making parts.
Nice machine. Instead of a guy doing a repetitive job, now you have someone designing the part and coding the CNC file to run this machine. After that, the machine can keep making the same part accurately as long as you feed it material and power (at least until it breaks down, and the machinist or others must come and fix it). Such machines even make the cutting bits for other machines.

My mill is manually operated. I only make one off parts occasionally. Same with my lathe and shaper.
Other machines will remain manually operated for quite some time, such as the saws and nailers used to build a typical house.
Up to about 1980, this was the most common database storage system for most corporations:
bb181660-dd3e-4071-b2e4-c72e66bcd778.276659688c9d9ad531476830d1f3c541.jpeg
Most corporations still have these. Rows and rows of them. Smaller ones are usually available as part of the office desk still.
That is no longer true, databases are becoming entirely electronic and stored on computer hard drives, etc.
It is still true. File cabinets haven't been eliminated. They are certainly not as numerous as they used to be though.
Databases are not electronics. They are software. This is what I mean by the information age. Everything from filesystems to various SQL databases storing company records and handling website traffic, to noSQL databases that are currently replacing SQL because it is much easier to store data across many machines, increasing reliability tremendously, is all software...not electronics...even though the computer itself is based on electronics.

A computer without software is useless.

In the near future--within a couple of decades at most--driverless vehicles will become pretty commonplace.
Too many political problems. The technology may be available, but the politics around them will prevent their full acceptance. Liability is just too great and will be directed against the manufactures of those vehicles.
That said, driver assist system are already commonplace and they help the driver (most want to drive their own cars anyway). A good example of these are the Subaru Eyesight system (assisting steering and cruise following), or the Tesla Driver Assist system (properly used), that can drive the car under good conditions, even do it's level best to avoid an accident. It cannot, of course, handle unusual or poor conditions such as construction sites, inclement weather, or redirections (either temporary or permanent), such as a detour. It works well for freeways, but sucks on surface streets.

Autopilots in airplanes are most commonplace. They can even follow a preprogrammed flight plan. ATC understands this and tries to keep air traffic on their stated flight plans as much as possible. Some advanced systems, using special equipment on the ground at an airport, can even land the plane. You still need the pilots though, to handle the manual stages of flight, changes by ATC, and of operations at airports.

Automated rapid transit systems are also most commonplace. The BART system serving San Francisco was the first fully automated system. Unfortunately, it kept screwing up, and now there is a 'driver' on every train, who's job it is to watch the robot and override when it screws up (not if, WHEN). It's pretty good at handling block control by itself though. It has only failed at that once or twice. A single failure can cause a train wreck. In those cases, the driver overrode the robot and stopped the train to clear the block it attempted to invade.
In mining, since you mention that, the dump trucks will need no driver.
Not for quite awhile yet! Roads keep changing. There are often no roads at all until the dump trucks and other equipment build them. Robots have one very basic problem: They are blind or almost blind. They don't know how to handle unusual situations or even detect an unusual situation. Robot vision processing has a looooong way to go.
There are already a considerable number of robotic construction machines.
Quite true. They are either following a preprogrammed routine or are just large remote control machines, like a remote controlled Tonka truck...just bigger.
Some still have a human supervising the machine, just in case, but they operate on their own virtually the entire time.

https://asirobots.com/mining/dozer/
https://www.constructiondive.com/news/komatsu-to-unveil-semi-autonomous-bulldozers/571751/

So, yes, a lot of mining operations will become close to totally robotic in the coming decades.
Most of this is remote control, not autonomous. Semi-autonomous means it's remote controlled with a 'driver assist'.

Such machines can make mining safer, by having a remote controlled machine to the digging or blast setting. It's also safer for the machine to work in poorly shored up areas until it can install proper shoring.
Automated equipment can also make it easier to travel the considerable distance a mine often has on the rail lines installed in the mine.
 
Which, personally, I think is very nice of the planet.

And no - I'm not saying one weather event means anything. But, it is showing us what a likely future outcome will be. Global temps pushing and exceeding 100, the polar caps melting at accelerated rates.

Honestly, even the Green New Deal doesn't go far enough. We need a revolution in terms of energy use and conservation. It won't happen - but it's what we need. Conservatives always say that environmentalists are alarmists and have been doing the "boy cries wolf" routine for decades - but what they don't seem to realize is that most predictions about the climate and our planet have come true. We've just gotten used to the changes.

Priceless! We get some hot weather and the dipshits start yelling "the sky is falling!" The planet really is descending into a bunch of low IQ, gullible morons. :palm:
 
:palm: Dear Readers, check out Posts #152 & #155 on this thread. TA Gardner is so intent on the gain saying of anything or any position I post that he develops a sort of myopia in his discussion.
LIF. You are describing yourself.
I'll dumb it down further for him: I never denied the fact of automation and it's electronic/digital off springs (relatively)rapidly replacing the mechanical (i.e., the typing pool, manual typewriters, paper file draws). What I did DOCUMENT was the FACT that all this switch over STILL DEPENDS UPON INDUSTRIAL TECHNIQUES BORN OF THE INDUSTRIAL AGE TO OBTAIN THE RAW MATERIALS TO CREATE THE ELECTRONIC AGE.
Learn what 'fact' means. It is not a Holy Word.
Human workers may be replaced by robots decades from now, but the environmental and ecological damage will be the same.
What environmental and ecological damage? Define it. Buzzword fallacy. Repetition fallacy (chanting).
Add to this that all these electronic wonders are STILL being powered by industrial power plants, and that does not bode well for our environment (i.e., air pollution).
What air pollution? Define this 'pollution'.
Add to this the FACT that used and out-dated electronics are NOT being recycled 100%,
So? Learn what 'fact' means. It is not a Holy Word.
as there is economic incentive just to dump these items in another country with lax (or non-existent) waste disposal laws.
Actually, there isn't. Dumping stuff in another country means paying to transport it there. It's cheaper to dump in your own country.
That does NOT bode well for the human population.
Why? The human population is increasing, not diminishing.
Add to this "conservative" resistance to environmental changes to their business (Power company's bogus campaign against solar and wind power),
Nothing bogus about is. Watt for watt, solar is the most expensive method of developing electric power. Wind is the 2nd most expensive.
and the seal clapping about SCOTUS pulling the EPA's teeth,
The EPA itself is unconstitutional. Congress never had any authority to create the EPA and give it the powers that it has (or had).
and the "electronic age".
The so-called electronic age has occurred, dumbass.
Add all these together and all the advantages of the electronic age products are not bringing ecological and environmental positive changes with them as fast.
They already have. You cannot deny history, dumbass.
A matter of history, a matter of fact.
You deny history. Not a fact. Learn what 'fact' means. It is not a Holy Word.
 
Back
Top