Random phrase. Trolling.
Random phrase. Trolling.
Random phrase. Trolling.
So, according to you ALL mining operations have been either replaced by robots or will be shortly? Hmmm, better get on the phone and tell Senator Manchin about this! And since your obviously a videot (young person who knows nothing beyond their birthday and relies solely on TV for all information), you must not know that PREDICTIONS of COMPLETE AUTOMATION of all industries in American have been going on since the early 1970's and beyond. Yes, there is progress and many jobs have been replaced with technology...and it doesn't change the FACT regarding pollution levels from production of raw materials and waste disposal crimes. God, you're such a proud ignoramus!
All your insipidly stubborn repetition and babbling STILL hasn't disproved, refuted or diminished the info in the links and my subsequent references. Carry on, my little willfully ignorant troll.
Take note ProudLefty, the above IS gaslighting--and an ad hominem. Automation in industry has been increasing steadily. It won't replace the workforce entirely for the foreseeable future either. Electronics have also supplemented even manually operated machinery in many fields.
![]()
Adding a DRO kit to a mill or lathe allows manually operated machines to increase their accuracy and repeatability on making parts.
Up to about 1980, this was the most common database storage system for most corporations:
![]()
That is no longer true, databases are becoming entirely electronic and stored on computer hard drives, etc.
In the near future--within a couple of decades at most--driverless vehicles will become pretty commonplace. In mining, since you mention that, the dump trucks will need no driver. There are already a considerable number of robotic construction machines. Some still have a human supervising the machine, just in case, but they operate on their own virtually the entire time.
https://asirobots.com/mining/dozer/
https://www.constructiondive.com/news/komatsu-to-unveil-semi-autonomous-bulldozers/571751/
So, yes, a lot of mining operations will become close to totally robotic in the coming decades.
Take note ProudLefty, the above IS gaslighting--and an ad hominem. Automation in industry has been increasing steadily. It won't replace the workforce entirely for the foreseeable future either. Electronics have also supplemented even manually operated machinery in many fields.
![]()
Adding a DRO kit to a mill or lathe allows manually operated machines to increase their accuracy and repeatability on making parts.
Up to about 1980, this was the most common database storage system for most corporations:
![]()
That is no longer true, databases are becoming entirely electronic and stored on computer hard drives, etc.
In the near future--within a couple of decades at most--driverless vehicles will become pretty commonplace. In mining, since you mention that, the dump trucks will need no driver. There are already a considerable number of robotic construction machines. Some still have a human supervising the machine, just in case, but they operate on their own virtually the entire time.
https://asirobots.com/mining/dozer/
https://www.constructiondive.com/news/komatsu-to-unveil-semi-autonomous-bulldozers/571751/
So, yes, a lot of mining operations will become close to totally robotic in the coming decades.
Dear Readers, check out Posts #152 & #155 on this thread. TA Gardner is so intent on the gain saying of anything or any position I post that he develops a sort of myopia in his discussion.So basically you're saying we're heading to a socialist utopia?

So basically you're saying we're heading to a socialist utopia?
Yet you describe a system that is creating energy out of nothing. Paradox. Which is it, dude???
Correct. In any closed system, no energy sources or sinks may be considered from outside that system.
No. An open system is simply the Universe itself. You still cannot create energy out of nothing.
It is a closed system to both, if that is indeed your chosen system.
Yes it is.
You can't clear your paradox by denying it, dude. You MUST choose one and only one of the conflicting arguments and never use the other again. That is the ONLY way to clear a paradox.
Refraction is not reflection. Reemission is a buzzword. It doesn't exist. When a photon is absorbed, it is DESTROYED.
You cannot trap heat. You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas either. Heat has no temperature. CO2 is not a thermal insulator.
Of course you disagree. You have already demonstrated you are discarding the 2nd law of thermodynamics. You can't accept this law and ignore it at the same time, dude.
That's all he can speak for, though he often tries to speak for everyone.
This is your belief, is it?
Earth is going to be unlivable soon enough--no longer much doubt about that--but we won't last quite long enough to see it.
Urge the young people to not procreate, and that's about all we can do at this point.
Today's newborn babies have a holocaust in front of them. Abortion is a blessing to them.

Word stuffing. He never said any such thing.So, according to you ALL mining operations have been either replaced by robots or will be shortly?
LIF. You are describing yourself again.Hmmm, better get on the phone and tell Senator Manchin about this! And since your obviously a videot (young person who knows nothing beyond their birthday and relies solely on TV for all information),
Many have already occurred.you must not know that PREDICTIONS of COMPLETE AUTOMATION of all industries in American have been going on since the early 1970's and beyond.
No. Jobs have CHANGED because of technology, they weren't eliminated. Indeed, technology has brought MORE jobs and better paying jobs.Yes, there is progress and many jobs have been replaced with technology.
Learn what 'fact' means. It is not a worship word. It is not a proof. It is not a Universal Truth...and it doesn't change the FACT regarding pollution levels from production of raw materials
If someone is committing a crime disposing of waste, it's already a crime. So?and waste disposal crimes.
Insults get you nowhere.God, you're such a proud ignoramus!
LIF. You are describing yourself again.All your insipidly stubborn repetition and babbling
Special pleading fallacy. False authority fallacy. 'Fact' worship.STILL hasn't disproved, refuted or diminished the info in the links and my subsequent references.
Buzzword fallacies.Carry on, my little willfully ignorant troll.
So much bullshit in just one post
There is nothing different from the Climate than has always been. How stupid are you lefties>?
He doesn't take notes. He just trolls.Take note ProudLefty,
Correct.the above IS gaslighting--and an ad hominem.
Indeed. Much has already been automated.Automation in industry has been increasing steadily.
It actually just changes the jobs, making them better paying jobs, and even creating jobs that never existed before. People have to design and build these machines (also automated), install them, maintain them, operate them (such as overseeing mining or processing operations), fix them when they break down, and program them.It won't replace the workforce entirely for the foreseeable future either.
Nice machine. Instead of a guy doing a repetitive job, now you have someone designing the part and coding the CNC file to run this machine. After that, the machine can keep making the same part accurately as long as you feed it material and power (at least until it breaks down, and the machinist or others must come and fix it). Such machines even make the cutting bits for other machines.Electronics have also supplemented even manually operated machinery in many fields.
![]()
Adding a DRO kit to a mill or lathe allows manually operated machines to increase their accuracy and repeatability on making parts.
Most corporations still have these. Rows and rows of them. Smaller ones are usually available as part of the office desk still.Up to about 1980, this was the most common database storage system for most corporations:
![]()
It is still true. File cabinets haven't been eliminated. They are certainly not as numerous as they used to be though.That is no longer true, databases are becoming entirely electronic and stored on computer hard drives, etc.
Too many political problems. The technology may be available, but the politics around them will prevent their full acceptance. Liability is just too great and will be directed against the manufactures of those vehicles.In the near future--within a couple of decades at most--driverless vehicles will become pretty commonplace.
Not for quite awhile yet! Roads keep changing. There are often no roads at all until the dump trucks and other equipment build them. Robots have one very basic problem: They are blind or almost blind. They don't know how to handle unusual situations or even detect an unusual situation. Robot vision processing has a looooong way to go.In mining, since you mention that, the dump trucks will need no driver.
Quite true. They are either following a preprogrammed routine or are just large remote control machines, like a remote controlled Tonka truck...just bigger.There are already a considerable number of robotic construction machines.
Most of this is remote control, not autonomous. Semi-autonomous means it's remote controlled with a 'driver assist'.Some still have a human supervising the machine, just in case, but they operate on their own virtually the entire time.
https://asirobots.com/mining/dozer/
https://www.constructiondive.com/news/komatsu-to-unveil-semi-autonomous-bulldozers/571751/
So, yes, a lot of mining operations will become close to totally robotic in the coming decades.
Which, personally, I think is very nice of the planet.
And no - I'm not saying one weather event means anything. But, it is showing us what a likely future outcome will be. Global temps pushing and exceeding 100, the polar caps melting at accelerated rates.
Honestly, even the Green New Deal doesn't go far enough. We need a revolution in terms of energy use and conservation. It won't happen - but it's what we need. Conservatives always say that environmentalists are alarmists and have been doing the "boy cries wolf" routine for decades - but what they don't seem to realize is that most predictions about the climate and our planet have come true. We've just gotten used to the changes.

LIF. You are describing yourself.Dear Readers, check out Posts #152 & #155 on this thread. TA Gardner is so intent on the gain saying of anything or any position I post that he develops a sort of myopia in his discussion.
Learn what 'fact' means. It is not a Holy Word.I'll dumb it down further for him: I never denied the fact of automation and it's electronic/digital off springs (relatively)rapidly replacing the mechanical (i.e., the typing pool, manual typewriters, paper file draws). What I did DOCUMENT was the FACT that all this switch over STILL DEPENDS UPON INDUSTRIAL TECHNIQUES BORN OF THE INDUSTRIAL AGE TO OBTAIN THE RAW MATERIALS TO CREATE THE ELECTRONIC AGE.
What environmental and ecological damage? Define it. Buzzword fallacy. Repetition fallacy (chanting).Human workers may be replaced by robots decades from now, but the environmental and ecological damage will be the same.
What air pollution? Define this 'pollution'.Add to this that all these electronic wonders are STILL being powered by industrial power plants, and that does not bode well for our environment (i.e., air pollution).
So? Learn what 'fact' means. It is not a Holy Word.Add to this the FACT that used and out-dated electronics are NOT being recycled 100%,
Actually, there isn't. Dumping stuff in another country means paying to transport it there. It's cheaper to dump in your own country.as there is economic incentive just to dump these items in another country with lax (or non-existent) waste disposal laws.
Why? The human population is increasing, not diminishing.That does NOT bode well for the human population.
Nothing bogus about is. Watt for watt, solar is the most expensive method of developing electric power. Wind is the 2nd most expensive.Add to this "conservative" resistance to environmental changes to their business (Power company's bogus campaign against solar and wind power),
The EPA itself is unconstitutional. Congress never had any authority to create the EPA and give it the powers that it has (or had).and the seal clapping about SCOTUS pulling the EPA's teeth,
The so-called electronic age has occurred, dumbass.and the "electronic age".
They already have. You cannot deny history, dumbass.Add all these together and all the advantages of the electronic age products are not bringing ecological and environmental positive changes with them as fast.
You deny history. Not a fact. Learn what 'fact' means. It is not a Holy Word.A matter of history, a matter of fact.