The freedom to disrespect people... How far does that go?

1% ?

So, Angelina Jolie has 3 adopted children who are not related to each other biologically - nor related to her. All three are "trans."

What at the odds? Sharon Stone also has both of her children "trans." But they were "born that way," right? It's not their psychotic, attention seeking mothers - they just happened to be born that way.
Jolie has three adopted children, all self identify as the gender they were born. Stone has three adopted sons, all were male at birth, and self identify now as male. So out of six people Censored claims are trans, zero are.

What are the odds? Assuming that 1% of the people are trans, and they were picked at random, the odds six people would not be trans is a little above 94%.

Or what are the odds Censored would lie? Very high.

Shiloh Jolie is sort of trans, but she is the biological child of both Jolie and Pitt. She is not adopted, so not covered in the six Censored brought up. She looks a lot like both her parents.

Anyway, for a while she self identified as non-binary, using the name "John" and the pronouns "they/them." She did no medical procedures. She seems to have backed away from that a bit lately, legally changing her name only to drop the Pitt, not to add John, and also not making any legal change in her gender. In a press release at the time, she had herself referred to with the pronouns "she/her."

So even if we expand the number of people Censored referenced to nine people, only one might be trans. There is an almost 9% chance that at least one person out of nine would be trans, assuming a random picking, and that 1% of people are trans.
 
Are there though?

This is a favorite of the groomers. First off we could agree that anyone with both testes and ovaries can indeed decide what gender they want to be. Then we might ask how a blue hair with a nose ring grooming a 5 year old in the public schools knows so much about their genitals? Then there is the issue the hermaphrodite syndrome isn't the way pro-groomers of the left present it.

In fact, there has NEVER been a documented case where a human had both male and female reproductive organs. Not even one.



Instead there are cases of deformities where overly large clitoris in women show reactive characteristics similar to penises. Particularly common (1 out of a million) are vestule labia near the scrotum in men. In all cases the person is male or female, with generally minor traits from the other gender.
The only cases I can think of are those that mutilated themselves surgically.
It doesn't change their gender, but it does mean they will sacrificed their ability to reproduce to this sick religion.
 
That is a blatant lie. Recognizing that the Constitution does not constrain corporations in no way says "it's fine."
Absolutely correct.
As I said - they should have been prosecuted.
For what? The press is free to look like fools. See the 1st amendment.
They paid the price for what they did too. Few people even pay attention to them anymore.
You are a liar - and like all the Marxists here, start name calling when you are exposed.
Absolutely correct again. This is when you see they have no more arguments to present. They've lost.

It's like talking to a little brat.
 
Absolutely correct.

For what? The press is free to look like fools. See the 1st amendment.
They paid the price for what they did too. Few people even pay attention to them anymore.

Absolutely correct again. This is when you see they have no more arguments to present. They've lost.

It's like talking to a little brat.
Governments can censor.
Corporations can censor.


Buzzword fallacies. Go learn English.
all you libertrarians are fascist totalitarian cocksuckers in disguise.

stop denying it, anal fetishist.
 
Reduced to pathetic lies?

I'm starting to think you're a Douche Duck sock.
He isn't. He just doesn't know English, so he throws out random shit. NoName's problems are uniquely his own. He seems to think corporations are somehow "evil" just for being a corporation, and tends to believe in all sorts of conspiracies, including chemtrails, the so-called 'government-corporate' Illuminati, etc.

Sybil (what you call Douche Duck) does know better English, but he hallucinates, thinks he's other people, and had an unhealthy infatuation with calling people pedophiles and keeps posting TDS memes and junior high level adolescent material.

You will note that Sybil hasn't 'liked' NoName's posts. He typically will 'like' any post made through one of his many socks. What one sock posts, the other socks 'like'. Dutch Uncle seems to be his main account.
 
Last edited:
He isn't. He just doesn't know English, so he throws out random shit. NoName's problems are uniquely his own.

Sybil (what you call Douche Duck) does know better English, but he hallucinates, thinks he's other people, and had an unhealthy infatuation with calling people pedophiles and keeps posting TDS memes and junior high level adolescent material.
why are libertarians such censorious globalist banker cocksucker desantoid not maga poser Zionists?
 
Are there though?

This is a favorite of the groomers. First off we could agree that anyone with both testes and ovaries can indeed decide what gender they want to be. Then we might ask how a blue hair with a nose ring grooming a 5 year old in the public schools knows so much about their genitals? Then there is the issue the hermaphrodite syndrome isn't the way pro-groomers of the left present it.

In fact, there has NEVER been a documented case where a human had both male and female reproductive organs. Not even one.



Instead there are cases of deformities where overly large clitoris in women show reactive characteristics similar to penises. Particularly common (1 out of a million) are vestule labia near the scrotum in men. In all cases the person is male or female, with generally minor traits from the other gender.
It's called intersex and they exist.
 
one who defends or denies the monolithic power structure of combined corporate and state power.
Nope.

Fascism is ultimately the ideal that all power and property rightfully belong to the state.

Tell me, the state controlled industries under Mussolini, did they sell stock to the public? Was there an exchange involved?
 
Back
Top