The first woman President

maineman said:
no. I guess maybe you're too fucking dense to have figured it out before, but I am a male.
Click to expand...

You’re male? Based on the effeminate whiney stupidity you constantly erupt with I was thinking an old dike on PMS.

maineman said:
Oh wait.... was that last post one of your incredibly lame attempts at an insult?
Click to expand...

It wasn’t an insult shit-for-brains; it was an accurate description of your whiney effeminate stupidity.

maineman said:
what a fucking loser you are, and have always been, write.
Click to expand...

Look at this, a fucking loser slum dwelling expat calling others losers; now there’s some irony of epic proportions.

This coming from the whiney dumbass who opines people who hurl insults; you really are THAT stupid, THAT big of a hypocrite and THAT repugnant.
 
maineman said:
35 member states. I think Micronesia sent three cooks and a microwave. Righties can call it a coalition all they want... the VAST majority of coalition blood treasure was ours.
Click to expand...

This is your brain stuck on stupid, hypocrite, repugnant and hyper partisan; don't be a Mainetard.

Please identify a UN action where the vast majority of coalition blood and treasure was NOT "ours".
 
maineman said:
somebody turn off TD's insult generating macro.... it's developed a life of its own!
Click to expand...

I wish someone would turn off your whine hypocrite generating macro....it's developed a life of its own!!!!

Have some cheese with that effeminate whine shit-for-brains.

 
Truth Detector said:
This is your brain stuck on stupid, hypocrite, repugnant and hyper partisan; don't be a Mainetard.

Please identify a UN action where the vast majority of coalition blood and treasure was NOT "ours".
Click to expand...

thank you for proving my point.

However....

I think I'd point to the UN Truce Supervision Organization in Palestine.... American losses are far from the majority, as is American participation.
 
and I don't recall the UN putting its imprimatur on our invasion of Iraq.... do you? Nobody was wearing blue helmets that I can recall.
 
maineman said:
thank you for proving my point.

However....

I think I'd point to the UN Truce Supervision Organization in Palestine.... American losses are far from the majority, as is American participation.
Click to expand...

So you use a resolution that was an abject failure in everything it was created to accomplish and think this makes your point? How predictable.

No, dunce, I was thinking more in terms of the Korean conflict, invasion of Kuwait and invasion of Afghanistan. But ignorant dunces stuck on hyper partisan buffoonery like you would think that this only applies to Iraq.
 
maineman said:
and I don't recall the UN putting its imprimatur on our invasion of Iraq.... do you? Nobody was wearing blue helmets that I can recall.
Click to expand...

Apparently you didn't read UN resolutions that place enforcement of its resolutions on the member states. But then, you're a hyper partisan dunce stuck on ignorant and think that the member states can only act if there is 100% agreement by all member states; or that Russia, China and France have special status within the UN and without them, no actions can be conducted.

http://www.fas.org/news/un/iraq/sres/sres0678.htm

2. Authorizes Member States co-operating with the Government of Kuwait, unless Iraq on or before 15 January 1991 fully implements, as set forth in paragraph 1 above, the above-mentioned resolutions, to use all necessary means to uphold and implement resolution 660 (1990) and all subsequent relevant resolutions and to restore international peace and security in the area;
 
Teflon Don said:
So the left seems to making the calculus that Hillary is a lock not only for their own nomination but the Presidency as well.

We are asked to forget that after two terms the country is usually tired of the incumbent party. We are also asked to forget that the lefties cast Hillary aside in 2008. I heard something interesting today and that was that people would want to vote for the "First Woman President". But is that true?

I mean they voted for the first negro President and that didn't work out so great. Maybe the American people will be tired of firsts for a while?
Click to expand...

Let's not forget some of the comments she made, during her campaign, regarding Obama.
 
maineman said:
or maybe there will be enough voters without penises who are tired of voting for presidents WITH penises and seeing them mess everything up.
Click to expand...

Like I posted before.
Mainedman believe women are so stupid, that they're just going to vote with their vagina.
 
Truth Detector said:
I am amazed that you think it isn't; more proof of what an ignorant hyper partisan dolt you are.
Click to expand...

The then United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan said in September 2004 that: "From our point of view and the UN Charter point of view, it [the war] was illegal."
 
XLVIII DOMINATORS said:
July 3, 2003
Bush warns militants who attack U.S. troops in Iraq

"Anybody who wants to harm American troops will be found and brought to justice," Bush said. "There are some that feel like if they attack us that we may decide to leave prematurely. They don't understand what they are talking about if that is the case. Let me finish. There are some who feel like the conditions are such that they can attack us there. My answer is, bring 'em on."

AVI movie of comment (1.3MB)
Click to expand...

WTF
You mean there was more to that comment, other then what the liberals have been promoting??

I'm shocked.
SHOCKED I SAY
 
Last edited:
maineman said:
The then United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan said in September 2004 that: "From our point of view and the UN Charter point of view, it [the war] was illegal."
Click to expand...

That is because Kofi Annan is a dunce like you who apparently doesn't read his own resolutions and thinks that despots like Saddam should be permitted to ignore resolutions infinitum.

Annan also said the foillowing:

Mr Annan said the security council had warned Iraq in resolution 1441 there would be "consequences" if it did not comply with its demands. But he said it should have been up to the council to determine what those consequences were.

Sorry, but I just cannot find this language in any UN resolution.

But again, the claim that Iraq was not a UN action requires the willing suspension of intelligence, facts and common sense. Yay you!
 
who would have been surprised that truth deflector would claim to know more about the legality of United Nations actions than the Secretary General of the United Nations?

This from the same guy who claimed to be smarter than the valedictorian of the West Point class of 1966.

delusional, thy name is truth deflector!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top