The False premise driving the anrthem protest

Wolverine

Verified User
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...t-black-men-rare-heres-what-data-actually-say

This is just part of the article
And the media narrative to the contrary is damaging. A few days ago, former police officer Jason Stockley, who is white, was acquitted of first-degree murder; he had fatally shot Anthony Lamar Smith, who was black, in 2011. Protests started in St. Louis, where the shooting took place and Stockley was judged, immediately after the verdict was announced. Although they were initially peaceful, they soon turned violent, and dozens of protesters were arrested while several police officers were injured. Since the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, just outside St. Louis, in 2014, this has become a familiar pattern. This article is not about whether Stockley should have been acquitted. Instead, I want to talk about the underlying narrative regarding the prevalence of police brutality against black men in the U.S., which is largely undisputed in the media. According to this narrative, black men are constantly harassed by the police and routinely brutalized with impunity, even when they have done nothing wrong, and there is an “epidemic of police shootings of unarmed black men.” Even high-profile black celebrities often claim to be afraid of the police because the same thing might happen to them. Police brutality, or at least the possibility that one might become a victim of such violence, is supposed to be part of the experience of a typical black man in the U.S. Events such as the death of Brown in Ferguson are presented as proof that black men are never safe from the police. This narrative is false. In reality, a randomly selected black man is overwhelmingly unlikely to be victim of police violence — and though white men experience such violence even less often, the disparity is consistent with the racial gap in violent crime, suggesting that the role of racial bias is small. The media’s acceptance of the false narrative poisons the relations between law enforcement and black communities throughout the country and results in violent protests that destroy property and sometimes even claim lives. Perhaps even more importantly, the narrative distracts from far more serious problems that black Americans face.

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...t-black-men-rare-heres-what-data-actually-say
 
^I linked the same NR article the other day and no one refuted its premise.

When you factor in the rate of violent crime amongst the black population the anti-black bias by cops all but disappears. This makes intuitive sense insofar as there is a much higher crime rate in inner cities so you would expect police to have more violent encounters there than in suburbs or rural areas.

Not that there's absolutely no racial bias amongst cops---there's going to be some degree of it since cops are people, and there's millions of them in the US. But it's being over played by the media.
 
Back
Top