The evidence is clear: it’s time to prosecute Donald Trump

The mountain of already public evidence would surely lead a DC jury to reject Trump’s defense that that he honestly believed his own “big lie” that widespread ballot fraud had deprived him of victory, and therefore that his intent was innocent.

First, Trump knew that the 60-plus court cases seeking to overturn the votes in contested states had failed.

Second, as the former Michigan US attorney Barbara McQuade has compellingly shown, five of Trump’s top officials told him unequivocally that all the fraud claims were false.

Third, Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, told Trump the same thing during the infamous recorded call in which Trump asked Raffensperger to “find” 11,780 votes, exactly one more than needed to overturn the state’s election.

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ump-criminal-charges-january-6-capitol-attack
 
BidenPresident said:
The mountain of already public evidence would surely lead a DC jury to reject Trump’s defense that that he honestly believed his own “big lie” that widespread ballot fraud had deprived him of victory, and therefore that his intent was innocent.

First, Trump knew that the 60-plus court cases seeking to overturn the votes in contested states had failed.

Second, as the former Michigan US attorney Barbara McQuade has compellingly shown, five of Trump’s top officials told him unequivocally that all the fraud claims were false.

Third, Georgia’s secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, told Trump the same thing during the infamous recorded call in which Trump asked Raffensperger to “find” 11,780 votes, exactly one more than needed to overturn the state’s election.

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...ump-criminal-charges-january-6-capitol-attack
Click to expand...

923. 18 USC § 371—Conspiracy to Defraud the United States

at the very least
 
BidenPresident said:
Poetic...and gross.
Click to expand...

it's like if a prosecutor was presented with a case involving dozens of first hand eye witnesses to the crime (plus hundreds of thousands more viewed it on video), the perp then brags about the crime and dares authorities to do a damn thing about it, and the DA says "not enough evidence to prosecute"

c'mon Garland, do your fucking job
 
reagansghost said:
it's like if a prosecutor was presented with a case involving dozens of first hand eye witnesses to the crime (plus hundreds of thousands more viewed it on video), the perp then brags about the crime and dares authorities to do a damn thing about it, and the DA says "not enough evidence to prosecute"

c'mon Garland, do your fucking job
Click to expand...

I am with you 100%. It's like cancer cells taking over the body. You can cut it out in the early stages. We are approaching a state where it is getting too late.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top