the Donks have got their campaign of lies underway.

Mr. T

Verified User
Author
Michele Goldberg

excerpt from one such attack. Notable in it is that NOT ONE WORD from Bachman, Romney or Perry is quoted. Views are attrbuted to them entirely out of thin air. They are accused of beliefs that they have never avowed. The only authority quoted for attributing nutty views to the GOP contenders is previous accusations by other Leftists.

So the fact that a rather nutty but tiny Christian sect exists is enough evidence to prove that any chosen Christian must believe in its tenets -- even if most people in the Christian world have never even heard of the sect concerned. Lies are the lifeblood of Leftism.

With Tim Pawlenty out of the presidential race, it is now fairly clear that the GOP candidate will either be Mitt Romney or someone who makes George W. Bush look like Tom Paine. Of the three most plausible candidates for the Republican nomination, two are deeply associated with a theocratic strain of Christian fundamentalism known as Dominionism. If you want to understand Michele Bachmann and Rick Perry, understanding Dominionism isn’t optional.

Put simply, Dominionism means that Christians have a God-given right to rule all earthly institutions. Originating among some of America’s most radical theocrats, it’s long had an influence on religious-right education and political organizing. But because it seems so outré, getting ordinary people to take it seriously can be difficult. Most writers, myself included, who explore it have been called paranoid. In a contemptuous 2006 First Things review of several books, including Kevin Phillips’ American Theocracy, and my own Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism, conservative columnist Ross Douthat wrote, “the fear of theocracy has become a defining panic of the Bush era.”

Now, however, we have the most theocratic Republican field in American history, and suddenly, the concept of Dominionism is reaching mainstream audiences. Writing about Bachmann in The New Yorker this month, Ryan Lizza spent several paragraphs explaining how the premise fit into the Minnesota congresswoman’s intellectual and theological development. And a recent Texas Observer cover story on Rick Perry examined his relationship with the New Apostolic Reformation, a Dominionist variant of Pentecostalism that coalesced about a decade ago. “[W]hat makes the New Apostolic Reformation movement so potent is its growing fascination with infiltrating politics and government,” wrote Forrest Wilder. Its members “believe Christians—certain Christians—are destined to not just take ‘dominion’ over government, but stealthily climb to the commanding heights of what they term the ‘Seven Mountains’ of society, including the media and the arts and entertainment world.”

In many ways, Dominionism is more a political phenomenon than a theological one. It cuts across Christian denominations, from stern, austere sects to the signs-and-wonders culture of modern megachurches. Think of it like political Islamism, which shapes the activism of a number of antagonistic fundamentalist movements, from Sunni Wahabis in the Arab world to Shiite fundamentalists in Iran.

Dominionism derives from a small fringe sect called Christian Reconstructionism, founded by a Calvinist theologian named R. J. Rushdoony in the 1960s. Christian Reconstructionism openly advocates replacing American law with the strictures of the Old Testament, replete with the death penalty for homosexuality, abortion, and even apostasy. The appeal of Christian Reconstructionism is, obviously, limited, and mainstream Christian right figures like Ralph Reed have denounced it.
source
 
Thanks, a valuable contribution at last.

Not that we needed more evidence of Bachmon and Perry's insanity, but still welcome news.
 
50261_155624284958_639653_n.jpg
Here's a new avatar pic for you, T.
 
Problem is, Dominionism is real.


Should Christians "take dominion" in the world before Christ returns?

Two movements within American Christian Church say yes.

Both of these movements fall under the classification of "Dominion Theology," which states a Biblical mandate to occupy or control all secular institutions until Christ returns.


http://www.biblicist.org/bible/dominion.shtml
 
Of course it is real, just as Mr.T is a retard.

He posted this article thinking he was helping the GOP, yet what he really helped was Obama's chance at re-election.
 
They do?

Please post proof.

Just reading how you and several of your other band of libtards respond is the only proof we need. None of you guys and gals can think fr yourself and rely on the talking points from the main stream media.

Isn't it funny that not a single lib-troll has anything worth reading in response to the article, all you guys do is make personal insults in trying to difuse anyone from reading the truth.

Is this your way of mind control and using political boards as a bully pulpit to stop folks from speaking out against anything they do not agree with? You dont have to answer because we know your answer to that question.

It must really scare you and your band of lib-trolls that Americans are waking up and they are looking for new leadership because your hopety change shit isn't working.
 
Dominionism means that Christians have a God-given right to rule all earthly institutions.

Not sure I follow the point here... So, if you are a Christian, it means you don't have a right to rule over earthly institutions? Only non-Christians have that right? When was that criteria established, and by whom? Do Christians have the right to rule over ANY institution? What about their own religious institutions, are they entitled to rule over those, or must we appoint Atheists for that as well?

This gets very confusing, because Obama professes to be a Christian, and he is currently ruling over the US as president, maybe he is one of these "dominionists?" I'm assuming they don't just come right out and tell you that's the plan, Bachmann and Perry have never mentioned it, so it stands to reason Obama might be a dominionist as well, since he is a Christian. Oh, and his preacher was pretty radical as I recall, that fits the profile for these dangerous dominionists as well.

But of course, this is silly... Obama can't be a dominionist because he's a liberal, right? And his radical preacher was espousing Black Liberation Theology, which is nothing at all like Radical and Dangerous Dominionism. Those Dominionists just want to rule over earthly institutions, and think they have the right to do so! They MUST be stopped! Is that what this pinhead is saying???
 
Obama may be a Dominionist, but I doubt it, seriously, do you want religious fanatics controlling our military? They have tried a time or two to control our government, thankfully secularism has prevailed!
 
Just reading how you and several of your other band of libtards respond is the only proof we need. None of you guys and gals can think fr yourself and rely on the talking points from the main stream media.

Isn't it funny that not a single lib-troll has anything worth reading in response to the article, all you guys do is make personal insults in trying to difuse anyone from reading the truth.

Is this your way of mind control and using political boards as a bully pulpit to stop folks from speaking out against anything they do not agree with? You dont have to answer because we know your answer to that question.

It must really scare you and your band of lib-trolls that Americans are waking up and they are looking for new leadership because your hopety change shit isn't working.


So your proof consists entirely of your psychosis, nothing more?
 
Last edited:
do you want religious fanatics controlling our military? They have tried a time or two to control our government, thankfully secularism has prevailed!

you see that's why the title of this thread refers to a campaign of lies from the left.......
 
Back
Top