The do-nothings

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
G

Guns Guns Guns

Guest
The Party with No Heart (and no brains) is headed for a massive victory next November according to Dixie...


The Republicans in Congress have made a wager. They've bet the political ranch that they will destroy Barack Obama's chances for re-election if they can block his proposals to produce jobs.

In fact, it's the GOP that could lose big when the votes are counted a year from now.

Republicans completely control the House. In the Senate they can use the filibuster to prevent anything from passing.

Last week, for the third time this fall, Republicans successfully blocked Obama's jobs program in the Senate.

Of course this came as absolutely no surprise, since Senate Republican Leader told the world earlier this year -- in no uncertain terms -- that his top legislative priority was to prevent the re-election of the president.

McConnell, and his House counterpart, John Boehner, don't lose a wink of sleep over concerns that their intransigence harms the economic prospects of everyday Americans.

In their view, the worse the economy gets, the more likely the voters will be to boot President Obama out of the Oval Office.

But a good case can be made that these guys will end up being too clever by half -- that in fact they are providing fuel for precisely the argument that could defeat them in 2012.

McConnell and Boehner are right that it is very hard for an incumbent president to win re-election in a bad economy.

And unless something dramatically changes, most Americans won't think much of their own economic circumstances when Election Day rolls around next year.

So next year's election will turn largely on one question: who does the American people hold responsible for what will likely still be a lousy economy?

Republicans are relying on the simple proposition that the guy in charge -- the president -- is to blame.

But every day of intransigence increases the odds that in fact, they themselves will get the rap.




http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/do-nothing-republican-con_b_1079569.html
 
In 1945 Vice President Harry Truman became president when Franklin Roosevelt died in office.


After the War, Truman presided over a substantial post-war recession that helped make him "unelectable" in the eyes of most pundits and politicians.


GDP dropped by a whopping 12%.


His political viability was complicated further when the Democratic base split into three parts.


A portion followed Progressive Henry Wallace and much of the Southern Democratic white vote (the south was a Democratic base at the time) supported Strom Thurmond's segregationist Dixiecrat Party.


In the April before the election, Truman's overall approval rating in the Gallup poll was just 36%.


But, Truman barnstormed the country, traveling 21,000 miles on a "whistle stop" tour where he decried the "do-nothing Republican Congress."


Though the economy began a modest improvement in 1948, no one -- but Truman himself -- believed he had a chance to defeat Thomas Dewey -- a former Governor cut out of the same elite cloth as Mitt Romney.


Truman won.


Obama can do exactly the same thing.


Even assuming that the economy continues to experience only modest improvements over the next year, the Obama campaign can lay the lack of progress where it belongs -- at the feet of the "do-nothing Republican Congress" that is intent on stalling economic recovery for their own political gain.


And where Truman's 1946 recession was largely the result of the post war demobilization, Obama can rightly claim that this economic disaster was the product of precisely the same Republican policies that his opponents intend to re-instate if they regain control of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.






http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/do-nothing-republican-con_b_1079569.html
 
Will Obama go for their throat like FDR and Truman did?

Shouldn't political and monetary gain at the State's expense be illegal?
 
Don't feed either troll........

Let's not be mistaken, Bravo. You may not agree, but there is NO DOUBT that it is people like you who are ruining American politics. I have not heard a SINGLE American pundit reporting to the non-American audience of the world, who is in favour of further polarisation. Not one. Granted I haven't heard them all and some have, in all other respects, been very pro their own country - as one would expect. I know you only believe what the right wing media tell you and that, unfortunately, marks you as a bit of a simpleton. Any intelligent being will look at and listen to all sides before making a choice. There is something about the American extreme right that seems to prevent them opening their ears and eyes.
Tell me, do you really, honestly want a country whose economy is in the hands of the few, a country whose people cannot afford to be sick, a country whose economy relies on the fighting of wars. Dont tell me you want freedom and that Obama is a communist because we both know that is untrue and is just sound-byte propaganda.
You and I, sir, have crossed swords in the past and undoubtedly will again in the future, but for now I ask you, as one 'mature' human being to another not to appear so bloody stupid. Intelligence is a bit like the old radio ads for Alkaseltzer, it can make you feel better. 'Try it ... you'll like it.'
 
Let's not be mistaken, Bravo. You may not agree, but there is NO DOUBT that it is people like you who are ruining American politics. I have not heard a SINGLE American pundit reporting to the non-American audience of the world, who is in favour of further polarisation. Not one. Granted I haven't heard them all and some have, in all other respects, been very pro their own country - as one would expect. I know you only believe what the right wing media tell you and that, unfortunately, marks you as a bit of a simpleton. Any intelligent being will look at and listen to all sides before making a choice. There is something about the American extreme right that seems to prevent them opening their ears and eyes.
Tell me, do you really, honestly want a country whose economy is in the hands of the few, a country whose people cannot afford to be sick, a country whose economy relies on the fighting of wars. Dont tell me you want freedom and that Obama is a communist because we both know that is untrue and is just sound-byte propaganda.
You and I, sir, have crossed swords in the past and undoubtedly will again in the future, but for now I ask you, as one 'mature' human being to another not to appear so bloody stupid. Intelligence is a bit like the old radio ads for Alkaseltzer, it can make you feel better. 'Try it ... you'll like it.'

Ironic post is still ironic and when reread, it's even amusing. :)
 
You said you didn't understand why and are unable to explain why.
I win...........again.. :)

Again with the reading comprehension issue...I didn't say I didn't understand (you fucking idiot) I said his post is not ironic.
Clearly it is you who doesn't understand.
 
Again with the reading comprehension issue...I didn't say I didn't understand (you fucking idiot) I said his post is not ironic.
Clearly it is you who doesn't understand.


Your admission that you are unable to see the irony, means that you are incappable of understand it.

Major fail on your part.
 
Your admission that you are unable to see the irony, means that you are incappable of understand it.

Major fail on your part.

No, dipshit, your inability to prove the irony proves you are a retard using talking ponit words you don't understand.
You made the claim, provide the proof. That is how it works.

Or we could start calling you Dixie.

Of course you would take that as a compliment.
 
No, dipshit, your inability to prove the irony proves you are a retard using talking ponit words you don't understand.
You made the claim, provide the proof. That is how it works.

Or we could start calling you Dixie.

Of course you would take that as a compliment.

But your'e the one who claims not to understand, so it falls to you to explain why you fail to see the irony.

Should we start calling you Dune..............................oops; to late.
 
Will Obama go for their throat like FDR and Truman did? Shouldn't political and monetary gain at the State's expense be illegal?

Favorability for Republicans in Congress trails the Republican Party as a whole, Democrats in Congress, the Democratic Party as a whole, and President Obama.


Funding jobs for teachers, firefighters and cops is very popular.


Repairing deteriorating schools is very popular. Building roads, ports and airports is very popular.


Providing unemployment benefits for those who are out of work is very popular.


And paying for it all by taxing millionaires and billionaires has the support of two thirds to three fourths of Americans -- including a majority of Republicans.


Finally, of course, is the matter of whom the Republicans will nominate as an alternative to President Obama.





http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-creamer/do-nothing-republican-con_b_1079569.html
 
Back
Top