The Democrats stupid strategy on promoting election deniers & extremists

BartenderElite said:
Wowzers. You know that EL and I are just talking about belief in QAnon...correct?

Okey dokey. The "most of them" in #17 is about GOP politicians - not even Republicans in general - and it's about election denial. The "for the most part" is conservatives ON THIS BOARD - did you even read the rest of the sentence? "MOST" of Trump's recent rally is just that - the PEOPLE AT THE RALLY. Again, not millions of Republicans. "It's really half" referred to the poll, which actually had the headline referring to 50%.

It's amazing how you guys lie & lie & lie, while trying to say I'm lying.

EDIT: Oh - and I never called it typical.
Click to expand...

You didn't address ANY of this. I think because you realized you were just grabbing desperately at things that I said - but not in the context of the claim you made.

I.e. - let's look at the 1st one. "Most of them" in post #17. That reference had NOTHING to do w/ QAnon, or my claim that a significant # of believed some or all of the QAnon theories. It was about Republican politicians, and they're denial of the 2020 election results. It was a completely unrelated post. It didn't back up your "typical" claim - which WAS a lie - whatsoever.

Please address this 1st one, and explain, and then we can move on to #2.
 
BartenderElite said:
"Ad hominen."

You keep using that term. Are you sure you know what it means?
Click to expand...

Yes, I do. It is Latin for "At (or To) the man." It is to insult you because of your argument rather than just fling an insult your way.

ad-hominem-examples.png


So, I know what it means because you eat dicks. :awesome:
 
BartenderElite said:
You didn't address ANY of this. I think because you realized you were just grabbing desperately at things that I said - but not in the context of the claim you made.

I.e. - let's look at the 1st one. "Most of them" in post #17. That reference had NOTHING to do w/ QAnon, or my claim that a significant # of believed some or all of the QAnon theories. It was about Republican politicians, and they're denial of the 2020 election results. It was a completely unrelated post. It didn't back up your "typical" claim - which WAS a lie - whatsoever.

Please address this 1st one, and explain, and then we can move on to #2.
Click to expand...

lol.....semantics are the last resort of the idiots.......apparently we should have realized that when you said "most of them" you really meant "most of a small part of them"......
 
What is w/ these posters? I say that a significant portion of the Republican base believes in all or some of the QAnon theories, and post 3 links proving that.

I also say that most Republican candidates are election deniers - and that means I "lied" about the QAnon claim?

Are people insane?
 
BartenderElite said:
What is w/ these posters? I say that a significant portion of the Republican base believes in all or some of the QAnon theories, and post 3 links proving that.

I also say that most Republican candidates are election deniers - and that means I "lied" about the QAnon claim?

Are people insane?
Click to expand...

Are you familiar with the RICO act? Many times lesser crimes are overlooked for a time in order to build an even bigger case against a large swath of an organization. You will learn a lot about it shortly after the new R Govt is seated. :cool: I am happy to hear you are all about law and order, you should be very happy by this time next year. ;)
 
Stone said:
Are you familiar with the RICO act? Many times lesser crimes are overlooked for a time in order to build an even bigger case against a large swath of an organization. You will learn a lot about it shortly after the new R Govt is seated. :cool: I am happy to hear you are all about law and order, you should be very happy by this time next year. ;)
Click to expand...

Did you mean to respond to another post?
 
BartenderElite said:
I was going to let this glaring example of how dishonest you & PMP are slide, but happy to keep bumping it.

None of those "indeed" citations have to do w/ my "significant" claim. I actually posted 3 separate links to support that claim, all of which clearly showed that large numbers of Republicans believed some or all of QAnon conspiracy theories. You were left w/ nothing but the usual "those are liberal polls." Yet you produced zilch for your "almost none of the right" claim.

This thread was embarrassing. It really just showed that you simply can't admit when you're wrong.
Click to expand...


They were three garbage links and one I proved you wrong from the body of the link YOU gave.
 
BartenderElite said:
Semantics? It has NOTHING TO DO WITH QANON.

What about that do you not understand?
Click to expand...

the part where you think that you can post something in a thread and then deny you said it on the basis you think what you said wasn't relevant to what we were discussing.......I think its logical that the reader can assume that you thought, when you said it, that it was relevant.......
 
BartenderElite said:
What is w/ these posters? I say that a significant portion of the Republican base believes in all or some of the QAnon theories, and post 3 links proving that.

I also say that most Republican candidates are election deniers - and that means I "lied" about the QAnon claim?

Are people insane?
Click to expand...

what is it with this poster......he makes a post and everyone shows him what he said wasn't true and then he pretends he wasn't lying........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
the part where you think that you can post something in a thread and then deny you said it on the basis you think what you said wasn't relevant to what we were discussing.......I think its logical that the reader can assume that you thought, when you said it, that it was relevant.......
Click to expand...

What did I deny that I said?

I said that a significant # of Republicans believed in QAnon. YOU said that I said "typical" - which I never said on here. So....who is lying?

Please be specific.
 
BartenderElite said:
Where?

Name the post.
Click to expand...

idiot.....I linked to it the last time you asked me to......I'm not your Step and Fetch It......this time you can page back up to our previous conversation.......(watch this folks, now the cunt will claim that since I didn't point to it TWICE, I am lying).......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
idiot.....I linked to it the last time you asked me to......I'm not your Step and Fetch It......this time you can page back up to our previous conversation.......(watch this folks, now the cunt will claim that since I didn't point to it TWICE, I am lying).......
Click to expand...

You linked me saying that belief in QAnon in the Republican Party was "typical?"

No, you didn't. Ever. Because I didn't say that. You are lying.

If you can cite the post where I made this claim, I will stop posting on this board, for good. Otherwise, you just told yet another lie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top