The Deep State is Alive and Well, Selling the Same Old Lie: "Sources and Methods" | Matt Taibbi

QP! said:
You have to be absolutely basement level, bottom dweller stupid to buy in to Tulsi crap.

To swallow that Mueller, life long Republican, widely respected by both GOP and Dems...

To swallow that the GOP lead Senate committee, lead by Marco Rubio...

To swallow that John Durham, Trump admin appointed Special prosecutor...


all lied to cover up for a 'deep State', puts anyone amongst the most stupid on this planet.
Click to expand...
Ok globalist big pharma fuckstick.
:okjen:
 
Scott said:
I think case of Donald Trump, I think he tends to do what he thinks is best for himself and perhaps a bit of family and close friends. I have a lot more respect for a few people in his Administration such as Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr.
Click to expand...
I see you here making the same mistake you make in Ukraine....not knowing where the power is....who is in control.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
Scott said:
I think case of Donald Trump, I think he tends to do what he thinks is best for himself and perhaps a bit of family and close friends. I have a lot more respect for a few people in his Administration such as Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr.
Click to expand...
I see you here making the same mistake you make in Ukraine....not knowing where the power is....who is in control.
Click to expand...

I was just talking about what I think of Donald Trump, Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr. In regards to who is in control, the first question should be, in control of what?
 
Phantasmal said:
Of course you think she’s great, you love a good conspiracy theory.

RFK Jr. is a moron of epic proportions, wrecking havoc on our healthcare system.
Click to expand...
Scott has been arguing that "biological viruses don't exist" for FIVE MONTHS. I can't take him seriously.
 
Scott said:
I favour what makes the most sense. What she's saying resonates with what various journalists I've been reading from have been saying for the past few years. Because she's a part of the federal government, she's been able to reveal more information than journalists were capable of doing on their own as well.



Absolute balderdash- he's a beacon of hope, shining light on the corruption inherent in the U.S. healthcare system as much as he's able.
Click to expand...
RFK Jr. is anti-vax. He is a steaming pile of stupidity.
 
Phantasmal said:
Scott, you’re comedy gold in my opinion, especially you’re seeing Kennedy as a beacon of hope and denying viruses exist.

You dwell in a realm of conspiracies and I for one can’t have a conversation with you because it’s so outlandish.

I wish you well, but I don’t suffer fools.
Click to expand...
^ Yes, you took the words out of my mouth. ^
 
Scott said:
From what I gather, he's not, at least not yet. I am though.



You know the conversation's going all flamy when you start to see the insults fly -.-
Click to expand...
That's even worse. You have no idea how unequivocally anti-vax he is while you admit yourself to being anti-vax. I couldn't give one fuck less about your delicate sensibilities. If you're a moron, I'm going to call you a moron.
 
Diesel said:
Scott has been arguing that "biological viruses don't exist" for FIVE MONTHS.
Click to expand...

Not quite. I've been arguing that there's no solid evidence that biological viruses don't exist. And I've been doing it for the past 3 years, though in different threads, and I didn't start doing it in this forum. I know this opinion isn't exactly popular in this forum. As far as I know, I'm the only member who's argued it here. But people don't need to agree with my stance on biological viruses to agree with other stances I have. I've agreed with a lot of people here on some subject or other, and disagreed with a lot of those same people on others. We're multifaceted beings, not 1 dimensional beings that must be judged based on a single belief.
 
Diesel said:
Scott said:
From what I gather, he's not, at least not yet. I am though.

You know the conversation's going all flamy when you start to see the insults fly -.-
Click to expand...
That's even worse. You have no idea how unequivocally anti-vax he is while you admit yourself to being anti-vax.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure I know his stances a lot better than you do. Or have you purchased and read his book "The Real Anthony Fauci" as well? Anyway, you don't have to read that much of what he's read to know that his stance isn't anti vax. The following quote dispels your belief rather quickly:
**
Holland said Kennedy’s message resonated with several senators who participated in the hearings — as did his call for “gold-standard science” on vaccines. According to Holland, several senators were “very supportive” of examining the link between vaccines and autism.

At several points during the hearings, Kennedy emphasized that he was “pro-vaccine” but also pro “good science.”
**

Source:
childrenshealthdefense.org

Watch: RFK Jr. Confirmation Hearings Shine Light on Vaccines-Autism Debate

Thousands of people showed up for last week’s contentious Senate confirmation hearings for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., nominated to lead HHS. Children’s Health Defense’s Mary Holland and Brian Hooker recapped the hearings on this week’s “The Defender In-Depth.”
childrenshealthdefense.org childrenshealthdefense.org

Diesel said:
I couldn't give one [insults removed]
Click to expand...

Ah, there you go getting all flamy again. I'll leave you to it.
 
Scott said:
Not quite. I've been arguing that there's no solid evidence that biological viruses don't exist. And I've been doing it for the past 3 years, though in different threads, and I didn't start doing it in this forum. I know this opinion isn't exactly popular in this forum. As far as I know, I'm the only member who's argued it here.
Click to expand...
It's bat shit insane. Proof of biological viruses has existed since the 19th century, but don't bother me with that topic. I have neither the inclination nor the patience for you to continue repeating yourself.
Scott said:
But people don't need to agree with my stance on biological viruses to agree with other stances I have. I've agreed with a lot of people here on some subject or other, and disagreed with a lot of those same people on others. We're multifaceted beings, not 1 dimensional beings that must be judged based on a single belief.
Click to expand...
Thank you for stating the obvious. You and I might be able to agree on some things, but it certainly won't be viruses or RFK Jr.
 
Scott said:
I'm pretty sure I know his stances a lot better than you do. Or have you purchased and read his book "The Real Anthony Fauci" as well? Anyway, you don't have to read that much of what he's read to know that his stance isn't anti vax. The following quote dispels your belief rather quickly:
**
Holland said Kennedy’s message resonated with several senators who participated in the hearings — as did his call for “gold-standard science” on vaccines. According to Holland, several senators were “very supportive” of examining the link between vaccines and autism.

At several points during the hearings, Kennedy emphasized that he was “pro-vaccine” but also pro “good science.”
**

Source:
childrenshealthdefense.org

Watch: RFK Jr. Confirmation Hearings Shine Light on Vaccines-Autism Debate

Thousands of people showed up for last week’s contentious Senate confirmation hearings for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., nominated to lead HHS. Children’s Health Defense’s Mary Holland and Brian Hooker recapped the hearings on this week’s “The Defender In-Depth.”
childrenshealthdefense.org childrenshealthdefense.org



Ah, there you go getting all flamy again. I'll leave you to it.
Click to expand...
Scott, you're either going to have to stop acting like such a pussy about "bad words" or stop talking to me.

 
Diesel said:
Scott said:
Not quite. I've been arguing that there's no solid evidence that biological viruses don't exist. And I've been doing it for the past 3 years, though in different threads, and I didn't start doing it in this forum. I know this opinion isn't exactly popular in this forum. As far as I know, I'm the only member who's argued it here.
Click to expand...
It's [insults removed]
Click to expand...

Alright, it's clear what you're after is a flame war, not an actual debate. So I'll just leave this here.
 
Reminds me of how Brian Berletic has been saying since March/April that everywhere one looks at Imperial Empire operations nothing much has changed with Trump as President, he considers MAGA to be a Swamp rebranding, a con job laid on the rubes....up till now successfully.
 
Based Chad said:
though they may just want to preserve the basic functionality of the overall operation, Mossad Kompromat.

Kompromat, variously translated as "compromising material", "discrediting material", or "incriminating material"), is damaging information about a person or a group, commonly a politician, businessperson, or other public figure, which may be used to create negative publicity, as well as for blackmail purposes, often to exert influence rather than monetary gain, and extortion. Kompromat may be acquired from various security services, or outright forged, and then publicized, e.g., via a public relations official.
Click to expand...
I Suppose, it's possible.
 
Scott said:
I also think the Epstein files thing is important too.
Click to expand...
Why do you believe this? Do you also believe in the chupacabra? Bigfoot? Why do you believe the "Epstein file" is anything other than a hoax?

Scott said:
In that case, it looks like Trump's covering it up because he's in them.
Click to expand...
So if someone floated the idea that you have pictures of yourself with the Loch Ness monster, and that you should release them to prove your innocence (of whatever), how would you respond, other than to admit that it must obviously be entirely true?
 
IBDaMann said:
Why do you believe this? Do you also believe in the chupacabra? Bigfoot? Why do you believe the "Epstein file" is anything other than a hoax?


So if someone floated the idea that you have pictures of yourself with the Loch Ness monster, and that you should release them to prove your innocence (of whatever), how would you respond, other than to admit that it must obviously be entirely true?
Click to expand...
a hoax the president also used to get into office? and all his people pumped on their podcasts for years?

it would be different if the president didn't also reference these issues.

condescension is not an argument.

:truestory:
 
Scott said:
If you're suggesting that nothing major will change due to Tulsi Gabbard's revelations, you may be right. However, that doesn't change the fact that there's a real story here. I also think the Epstein files thing is important too. In that case, it looks like Trump's covering it up because he's in them.
Click to expand...

The Biden admins spent years doctoring those files the same way they doctored files re RussiaGate. What do you think is really left to look at in them? Are you hoping to smear a lot of innocent people who had nothing to do with underage girls just for the gossip mongering tabloid style thrills and titillation tingles? The Epstein Files were worthless the second the DNC's criminal syndicate got control of them. Get over it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top