Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Every rightie acts like the cat who ate the canary. Trump? Who? Was he really a birther guy?
Listen, twit - as I said, I don't care that you didn't support the birther movement. Every post on this board from you supports the messiah of that movement. So, same thing. Sorry.
You bought every little thing about Clinton, true or false. She still hasn't been convicted of anything. You're a fool.
You jumped all over this fake news and still won't reject it.Where did I "support fake news"? Cite it, or shut the fuck up.
You jumped all over this fake news and still won't reject it.
You're unhinged, you can't even see it.
not the same thing at all. You have officially fallen off your rocker. I don't support trump on my policy positions. Even if I did, that doesn't mean I supported a movement that was completely ridiculous. In fact I spoke out directly against it many times on here. One can support policy positions while not support birtherism. They are not mutually exclusive things.
What I am really taking away is you are jealous that you are always wrong, always incompetent, always being fooled, and you want me to be in your camp. Misery loves company. You want me to be wrong with you. Well, sorry, that's never happened. I never supported the outlandish claims that you assert I am somehow tied to by some magic. You on the otherhand, can't help but routinely be taken in by this stuff, and it makes you furious that I was able to resist the crazy nuttery from conservatives but you can't do the same with the liberal side. I am better than you.
So you hold the birther movement in such disdain, but here you are, shilling your ass off for the biggest birther there ever was. The head of the birther movement. You claim he discredited himself, while you cheer him on.
No hypocrisy there at all, is there?
find one post of mine where I supported birtherism, or pizzagate, or called obama a kenyan, or claimed clinton murdered vince foster. I'll wait.
not the same thing at all. You have officially fallen off your rocker. I don't support trump on my policy positions. Even if I did, that doesn't mean I supported a movement that was completely ridiculous. In fact I spoke out directly against it many times on here. One can support policy positions while not support birtherism. They are not mutually exclusive things.
What I am really taking away is you are jealous that you are always wrong, always incompetent, always being fooled, and you want me to be in your camp. Misery loves company. You want me to be wrong with you. Well, sorry, that's never happened. I never supported the outlandish claims that you assert I am somehow tied to by some magic. You on the otherhand, can't help but routinely be taken in by this stuff, and it makes you furious that I was able to resist the crazy nuttery from conservatives but you can't do the same with the liberal side. I am better than you.
no, there isn't any hypocrisy. The two things are not mutually exclusive. Believing in getting good supreme court judges while not believing in birtherism are not mutually exclusive positions to hold.
no, there isn't any hypocrisy. The two things are not mutually exclusive. Believing in getting good supreme court judges while not believing in birtherism are not mutually exclusive positions to hold.
"Beyond all that, there is no bigger favor that Trump opponents can do for him than attacking him with such lowly, shabby, obvious shams, recruiting large media outlets to lead the way."
Bingo on that.
Nice dodge - not.
You think Trump is a genius. And he led the birther movement.
That is all.
Weasel.
And you didn't care at all about how discredited the FBI (a.k.a. "Trumpland") became.
Beam me up, Scotty. You guys are epic hypocrites. Ginormous.
Epic weasel. He even touted how only idiots took Trump "literally."
I do not think he is a genius. He certainly has outsmarted most liberals so far though. But that's a low bar.
Keep grasping at straws.
How about you actually go read through the article by glen greenwald, instead of dribbling spit all over the place in the midst of blubbering non-sequitors like "nate silver" and "birtherism." The article literally talks about many ways in which trump should be opposed, but relying on the deep state is counter productive. You are literally doing what the article advocates against.
thing1 is confirmed as one salty motherfucker
find one post of mine where I supported birtherism, or pizzagate, or called obama a kenyan, or claimed clinton murdered vince foster. I'll wait.