The Death of Clintonism

You made the faulty comparison in your premise. You seem to think tolerating is divorcing. Care to explain?

Would you care to explain why divorcing is better than seeking counseling and mending the relationship?

And here I thought cons were all about family, and that Christians were all about forgiveness.
 
I'm criticizing Hillpig for setting a poor example for young girls by tolerating BJ's abusive womanizing.

Then honesty should compel you to do the same about trumpig. Or have you forgotten all the women who came forward about being harassed after his pussy grabbing comments? Harassment which took place while he was married.
 
Would you care to explain why divorcing is better than seeking counseling and mending the relationship?

And here I thought cons were all about family, and that Christians were all about forgiveness.

You said Ivana and Marla tolerated being married to a womanizer/loser. Care to explain how divorcing a womanizer is tolerating him? Is that a No?
 
You said Ivana and Marla tolerated being married to a womanizer/loser. Care to explain how divorcing a womanizer is tolerating him? Is that a No?

He's womanized on Melania and she's still sticking around. Tolerance.

Furthermore, he divorced the wives, not the opposite.
 
He's womanized on Melania and she's still sticking around. Tolerance.

Furthermore, he divorced the wives, not the opposite.

So to explain to you the faulty logic in your premise:

1. They did not tolerate a womanizer

2. Trump is the winner.

Here is the true statement a more logical and accurate premise for you to start with: Ivana, Marla, and Melania tolerated a womanizer/winner. Because Trump won and Hillary lost, which makes Trump a winner. Or if you prefer, Bill Clinton is a womanizer married to a tolerant loser.
 
Then honesty should compel you to do the same about trumpig. Or have you forgotten all the women who came forward about being harassed after his pussy grabbing comments? Harassment which took place while he was married.

BJ actually had to pay Paula Jones 850k to settle a sexual harassment suit. Hillpig supports a serial womanizer, ... when her party is supposed to be the party of women (supposedly).

Women LET Trump grab their pussies. :dunno:
 
BJ actually had to pay Paula Jones 850k to settle a sexual harassment suit. Hillpig supports a serial womanizer, ... when her party is supposed to be the party of women (supposedly).

Women LET Trump grab their pussies. :dunno:

BAM, democrats love their own rapists.
 
So to explain to you the faulty logic in your premise:

1. They did not tolerate a womanizer

2. Trump is the winner.

Here is the true statement a more logical and accurate premise for you to start with: Ivana, Marla, and Melania tolerated a womanizer/winner. Because Trump won and Hillary lost, which makes Trump a winner. Or if you prefer, Bill Clinton is a womanizer married to a tolerant loser.

To explain to you the faulty logic in your premise:

1. Womanizing and running for elective office are two separate issues.

2. Winning or losing elective office has nothing to do with continuing or abandoning a marriage.

Your need to defend the fat-fingered vulgarian and his reprehensible past is noted.
 
BJ actually had to pay Paula Jones 850k to settle a sexual harassment suit. Hillpig supports a serial womanizer, ... when her party is supposed to be the party of women (supposedly).

Women LET Trump grab their pussies. :dunno:

^ Apparently you believe it because trump said it. I, on the other hand, don't believe it because trump said it, and I know that trump is a proven, perpetual liar.

trump also said he can't help himself from grabbing and kissing women and we do have evidence that those women hated it, so why would I believe they would like having their genitals grabbed?
 
They are prepping for a Chelsea congressional run. We aren't finished with the Clintons
no they are not you lying fucking asshole
This article should end the speculation.


CHELSEA CLINTON’S POLITICAL ASPIRATIONS

After witnessing her mother spoil the presidential campaign of the most popular Progressive candidate in recent memory, Chelsea Clinton became enamored with the possibility that some day she too can collude with party hacks to defeat a populist candidate and go on to be “upset” by a Republican candidate in a general election.

Chelsea, the sole offspring of Bill and Hillary Clinton (a fact that many Americans are grateful for), told the New York Times that ideally she would first like to lose to a Super Predator candidate (although she noted that she would settle for a Spic or a Hello Kitty candidate) in the Democratic primaries.

She added that before running for president a second time, she would like to earn the moniker “Crooked Chelsea” in order to emulate her mother the best she can. She proposed several ideas to accomplish this: flip-flopping on a bankruptcy bill after meeting with donors, exchanging political favors for that “good ol’ Saudi money,” and/or inserting moles into mainstream media outlets.

Chelsea has gotten so ahead of herself that she eagerly unveiled one of her future campaign slogans: I’m With Brat.https://thatfiresatire.com/2016/11/12/chelsea-clintons-political-aspirations/
 
Back
Top